Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 326 ]

Total 326 documents matching your query.

281. LF: RTTY on 501 (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 20:20:29 +0100
Copied the END OF TEST and HELLO WORLD here, but also lot of QRM, probably next doors Christmas madness. Could see others were there. Chris, G4AYT, JO01MI.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00022.html (8,323 bytes)

282. LF: WMR? (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:43:32 +0100
Who was transmitting QRSS on around 137.64 yesterday afternoon? A massive signal here, just caught WMR in the fast ID ahead of the QRSS, but couldn't understand the QRSS - looked like the spacing was
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00034.html (8,632 bytes)

283. LF: XIZ (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:48:40 +0100
Hi Chris, G3XIZ, Just to confirm, as one would expect, very strong audible signal here in Whitstable, Kent on 137.69. Sorry can't get back to you at present. Vy 73, Chris, G4AYT.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00207.html (8,302 bytes)

284. Re: LF: Re: 477 NOV What Modes ? (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:02:29 +0100
Yes Pete, look forward to that. Vy 73, Chris, G4AYT. -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] M0FMT To: [email protected] [email protected] Sent: Saturday, December 22, 20
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00354.html (21,198 bytes)

285. LF: 472.5 (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:19:13 +0100
Lovely signal here in Kent Mal, no TX here yet. Vy 73, Chris, G4AYT.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00378.html (8,241 bytes)

286. Re: LF: Re: 477 NOV What Modes ? (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 13:03:33 +0100
Hi Pete, Well, I think most of us would have spotted that number, but assumed it was just coincidence. I do think it would actually be helpful to publish the callsigns of NoV holders. Not only would
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00385.html (16,002 bytes)

287. Re: LF: Re: 477 NOV What Modes ? (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 18:47:39 +0100
Pete, I think the main requirement band plan wise is knowing which section to monitor for QRSS and other narrow modes, as one is restricted to quite a narrow bandwidth, very narrow with the slower QR
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00504.html (21,560 bytes)

288. Re: LF: WMR? (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 13:56:25 +0100
Thank you Markus! That explains it, I didn't realise that Opera-8 looked like that when monitoring for QRSS, that's going to be confusing (for me), especially if the signal is weak! Vy 73, Chris, G4A
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00592.html (11,400 bytes)

289. LF: RTTY G3XIZ (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 22:23:04 +0100
Good copy as ever Chris:- G0NBD DE G3XIZ GE GARXXXX GRAHAM, GOOD TO HEAR YOU ON RTTY AGAIN SOLID COPY DE G3XIZ KN Vy 73 de G4AYT, Whitstable, JO01MI.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00647.html (8,524 bytes)

290. Re: LF: Re: MF QRSS-10 test (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 19:42:48 +0100
OK Stefan, Yes, there is a bit of slow QSB on your signal, see attached capture. You are excellent audible copy indoors on my Eton E5 too. There was another station sending TEST about 40Hz away from
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00675.html (12,928 bytes)

291. LF: Re: 477 NOV What Modes ? (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 10:35:51 +0100
All modes, as per the licence and 136/7 band. Roger, yes, a couple of us are thinking about some QRP AM across town (subject to non QRM to other locals), and why not? Some sort of agreed band plan wo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00716.html (12,111 bytes)

292. LF: Re: MF QRSS-10 test (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 17:54:40 +0100
Hi Stefan, As I guess you would expect, or at least hope, MASSIVE signal here in south-east England! Vy 73, Chris, G4AYT, Whitstable, Kent, UK, JO01MI. -- Original Message -- From: "Stefan Schäfer" <
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00770.html (11,097 bytes)

293. Re: LF: UK - MF - LF (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 14:34:33 +0100
I thought the 'new band' was originally to be unrestricted, i.e. not by NoV, in the UK. I think it's a shame as this will surely reduce occupancy. I will probably stick to 136/7 myself. Chris, G3XIZ
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00816.html (15,436 bytes)

294. LF: Re: SSB - why not go digital? Have a look at FDMNV (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:24:36 +0100
Hi Geri, Thanks for that idea/information. I guess there are possibilities with this method for narrow AM as well. Definitely worth looking into. Vy 73, Chris, G4AYT. -- Original Message -- From: ger
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00206.html (16,906 bytes)

295. LF: Re: 476.170khz (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:02:59 +0100
Hi Henny, Nice strong audible signal here in SE England on 476.17kHz. Vy 73, Chris, G4AYT, JO01MI. -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] henny To: [email protected] blacksheep Sent: W
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00282.html (9,733 bytes)

296. Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 09:51:10 +0100
Hi Colin, Not too sure what you're getting at. We all have our individual interests. I hope you're not suggesting the new band should only be used by obsessive DX CW only enthusiasts? Chris, G4AYT. -
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00395.html (12,401 bytes)

297. LF: 472kHz Band QRSS (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 15:05:36 +0100
Who started the trend to have QRSS in the middle of the 'new' band? There are two extremely strong signals there now as I write this. I would have thought any mode that requires long plain carriers w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00397.html (10,269 bytes)

298. LF: M0FMT on 472kHz Band (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 10:53:09 +0100
Hi Pete, Heard you on CW on 472kHz band last evening, good copy at times but deep QSB. What RF power and antenna was that? Vy 73, Chris, G4AYT.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00432.html (8,636 bytes)

299. LF: RadCom February 2013 (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:24:02 +0100
I was surprised to see on page 9 of the latest RSGB RadCom under '2013 Band Plans', a statement re the 472 - 479kHz band:- "Activity is limited to modes with 500Hz bandwidth or less". The implication
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00659.html (9,892 bytes)

300. Re: LF: 472kHz Band QRSS (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 11:00:42 +0100
Hi Stefan, I agree with Mike, XDV, it makes more sense to have QRSS near the band edge, for the reasons stated. I cannot agree with your suggestion that QRSS would cause problems to 'normal' CW opera
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00754.html (16,138 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu