73.6 has been visible here for the last few nights and has been fairly strong and consistent between 03:00 and 06:00utc. Please see my plot for last night, the night before was similar. 73, Brian Thi
Dear Jim and Group, Report of test on my web pages. Jason is brilliant. 73, Brian I'll try to run the Jason beacon from about 2000utc until 2100 or so on 135.910kHz, and from 2300 until 0100 or later
Dear Jim, I can run the beacon again tonight in anyone is interested - is 135.910kHz a good frequency, or is there a better one? May I look at it the other way? 137.5xxx is an absolute mass of lines
Perhaps anyone who thinks he's being slandered would publish full details of his transmitter, antenna and earth system and let others make their own judgements. Far better than just hurling insults a
Part of QSO received in CT and am now putting it on my web pages. 73, Brian Hello LF group, especially hello Alberto, I called cq in Jason tonight and got a clear answer by Dave, G3YXM. After i gave
Hi Alberto, Thank you and many congratulations again. I have also transmitted audio across the shack from computer to computer with 136 background noise from the loudspeaker of a receiver. May I add
May I start with apologies. On switching on this morning the modem was called and connected to the ISP before I called the e-mail programme. Watching in open mouthed amazement the system blasted good
Hi all, I had no intention of making a comment either, BUT as one who was blasted out of the water on my first transmission I have not done too much transmitting since. Now it appears I am still doin
Sorry, can't read my own recordings. Started at around 22:00 utc on 23rd. As seen from here, the signal started up around 23:00 utc on 24th and closed down around 12:12 utc today, changing frequency
As seen from here, the signal started up around 23:00 utc on 24th and closed down around 12:12 utc today, changing frequency a couple of times along the way. Near enough to the SXV frequencies. Perha
There was a signal starting around 23:05utc, on 135923Hz, three characters, the middle one possibly a W. Does anyone claim it? 73, Brian 73 Brian CT1DRP IN51QD 41 09 58N 08 39 11W http://homepage.eso
If the 136KHz and 73KHz bands are monitored a distinct correlation will be seen between the "on time" of what I believe to be CFH on the two band. And the signals are usually very distinctly there or
Please see http://homepage.esoterica.pt/~brian/Catapult.htm for a version of the G3XPH system. 73, Brian 73 Brian CT1DRP IN51QD 41 09 58N 08 39 11W http://homepage.esoterica.pt/~brian
Fabian, there is a continuous transmission on 136.5KHz at this end of Europe, so not much chance of seeing any test transmission. 73, Brian Peter, DK7KO is beaconing right now on 136,5 kHz and asks f
Hi Rik, L = 0.4*(A+B)*(ln((A+B)/d)+7.6-0.35*(A+B)^2/(A*B)) where L = loop inductance in uH, A = loop height in m, B = loop length in m and d = wire diameter in mm The formula would be valid for loops
I would like to thanks all who have sent information on this subject. Some progress has been made in that I am now able to commnicate serially through a COM port using a simple QB45 routine running i
Hello Group, Having assembled some hardware I am now trying to drive it from the Com port of a computer. I am not a programmer but have used QB45. I find that a simple QB45 routine will run under DOS
Jim and Group. About 1920utc I received the letters MU but nothing else that made sense. There were many more lines compared to the last time. Sorry. 73, Brian At 1912 UTC I received M0BMU's signal w
To all the German operators my sincere thanks and very well done. There is an Argo-gram of DF6NM/P on my web pages. To Mal, providing the calibration of my system is not too far off the highest field
have just copied DF6NM/P on 137.708KHz or there abouts on DFCW using 3 second ARGO. 73, Brian 73 Brian CT1DRP IN51QD 41 09 58N 08 39 11W http://homepage.esoterica.pt/~brian
