Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 827 ]

Total 827 documents matching your query.

81. Re: LF: Valve LF amps and tank coil size / voltage rating? (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 20:08:00 +0000
That 58mm diameter toroid will have a core cross section in the region of perhaps  300mm^2  (about 17mm square). 2000V DC supply if it is being used as a transformer, means something like 1400V RMS m
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00329.html (13,359 bytes)

82. Re: Re[2]: LF: Valve LF amps and tank coil size / voltage rating? (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 20:34:00 +0000
Yes, but that's all an engineering problem. I'm sure the wire probably exists.   I've never played with a valve since dabbling in old TVs of the 1970's era, and never high power stuff. However, I hav
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00330.html (14,744 bytes)

83. Re: LF: Ramped BPSK (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 21:00:54 +0000
You can just about get away with clocking the DDS directly for 137kHz.    With and additional divide by 16, your DDS has to produce 2.2MHz which is within the capability of a DDS running at 10MHz clo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00334.html (12,884 bytes)

84. Re: LF: Ramped BPSK (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 19:27:19 +0000
humiliation of being a significant part of a mHz off QRG,   ;-)   The upside is that such offsets are perfectly deterministic. Knowing your clocking scheme, and assuming that your controller always
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00350.html (15,425 bytes)

85. Re: LF: Valve LF amps and tank coil size / voltage rating? (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 19:29:30 +0000
AH  HA  ......... I see the significance of your question.   176 = 4 * 44 :-) That factor 4.44   (or 4,44)   is actually SQRT(2) * PI 'jnt On 15 November 2015 at 09:18, Clemens Paul <[email protected]> w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00351.html (13,113 bytes)

86. LF: EbNaut test transmission (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 14:04:15 +0000
Mainly as a system test, I'm radiating an EbNaut signal.  Details are Frequency 137780.000  +/- 1mHz  (DOCXO only for this test) Coding 8K19A Symbol period  0.5s   (2 symbols / sec) Message length is
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00368.html (10,414 bytes)

87. LF: Re: EbNaut test transmission (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 14:07:14 +0000
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00369.html (11,751 bytes)

88. LF: Re: EbNaut test transmission (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 16:23:43 +0000
Its still going. At 1611z I ran rsNTP and it made a PC clock adjustment of 0.4 seconds, which with the 0.5s symbols used for this transmission will glitch slightly . Pleased to note that a local reco
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00370.html (11,411 bytes)

89. Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: LF: Re: EbNaut test transmission (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:39:08 +0000
  Good signal from you Andy despite most of my antenna being on the ground! Is there a beginners's guide to receiving? I looked at the ebNaut Windows software page and it says: "Spectrum Lab will fi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00373.html (20,049 bytes)

90. Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: LF: Re: EbNaut test transmission (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 22:47:15 +0000
    I have set up a dedicated small SpecLab instance for EbNaut data, with spectrogram uploads to  https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/EbNaut_spectrogram.png . The signal is generally weake
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00382.html (15,625 bytes)

91. Re: LF: 137.780 dash's (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 07:21:41 +0000
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00387.html (11,516 bytes)

92. Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: LF: Re: EbNaut test transmission (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 07:55:40 +0000
  Hi Andy,   below are bit-error derived Eb/N0 results of your decodes here. The gap between 17:20 and 20:10 was me taking a break, and 21:20 to 22:20 washed out by local QRM. I'll call it a day now
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00388.html (11,852 bytes)

93. Re: LF: 137.780 dash's (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 08:07:28 +0000
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00390.html (12,443 bytes)

94. LF: Coherent LF Receiver (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:13:20 +0000
Details of my Coherent LF receiver for digitising a signal centred on 1kHz then sending I/Q baseband samples over a serial link to a PC can be found at http://www.g4jnt.com/Coherent_LF_Receiver.pdf T
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00391.html (9,266 bytes)

95. Re: LF: USB TO SERIAL (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 14:16:09 +0000
Without a doubt, One from FTDI chip : www.ftdichip.com Absolutely flawless, drivers easy to install.  Never had a single problem with their family. I use the raw FT232 chips and ready made modules ,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00396.html (10,490 bytes)

96. Re: LF: Re: USB TO SERIAL (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 18:44:55 +0000
Andy What is actual built module name mal/g3kev   From: [email protected] Rik Strobbe Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 2:39 PM To: [email protected] [email protected]
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00408.html (14,269 bytes)

97. Re: LF: Re: Antenna relays (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 12:44:00 +0000
Alan -  You're forgetting the loading coil has to be switched out when using the loop at HF, so the relay has to withstand the full RF voltage when using it as a vertical at LF/MF.    So you'll need
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00424.html (13,325 bytes)

98. Re: LF: Re: Antenna relays (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:51:34 +0000
Hi Andy Surely the voltage will not appear across the contacts, though I agree contacts to activating coil might be a problem.   Yes reeds area problem because I think of the reed material. I only u
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00426.html (16,420 bytes)

99. Re: LF: Antenna relays (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 14:06:03 +0000
The Vacuum relays that used to be plentiful at rallies may be good enough.   They were designed for high power auto ATUs and cpuld certainly withstand many kV.   The currents in such ATUs, at teh kW
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00429.html (12,274 bytes)

100. Re: LF: EbNaut LF test from iz7slz (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 17:10:02 +0000
Nothing here either - I've been recording each 17.4 minute session using sampling rates of 31.25 or 62.5Hz, but the decoder throws up either nothing or a garbage decode with 30% bit errors indicated
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00440.html (11,629 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu