Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 275 ]

Total 275 documents matching your query.

81. Re: LF: Slower and slower (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:01:55 EST
<< There's nothing to stop you integrating a signal over days, except that the frequency stability and accuracy required (not the same thing) gets tighter and tighter. >> And, as Alberto pointed out,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00192.html (7,753 bytes)

82. Re: LF: Re: IK5ZPV ? (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 14:31:50 EST
<< Hi Rik, this message of yours was dated January 16th... look below. Either you have the wrong date set up on your PC, or your ISP seems not to be providing the best service it could... >> Alberto,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00250.html (7,752 bytes)

83. LF: Re. LF LDO>ZJ In a message dated 2/15/01 1:04:02 PM Eastern Standard Time, (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 19:16:29 +0100
<< I definetely believe that late Peter Bobek, DJ8WL would have loved that pioneering achievement and would have recognized it as what it is: a great way on how to perform one of the silliest challen
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00276.html (8,172 bytes)

84. Re: LF: lf transatlantic exchange of information (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:01:39 EST
<< They must be desperate for some sort of recognition even to the extent of bending the rules as they go along. >> Odd. I must have missed something. I don't recall the parties involved asking for a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00277.html (11,244 bytes)

85. Re: LF: DDS Frequency setting requirement (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:42:45 EST
<< There are just over 143 steps of 6.98 MilliHz in a single Hz, this will let us move in tighter for intercontinental work at 60 second bits and higher. We should be able to have between 7 and 10 st
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00342.html (7,882 bytes)

86. Re: LF: Re: CW-Keying via Soundcard or PC speaker (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 22:13:21 EST
<< my setup would only be on ssb with low power, and i think that with vfsk/dfcw using one second or less characters would give no problem. >> Agreed. It would probably work fine t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00430.html (8,505 bytes)

87. Re: LF: Re: CW-Keying via Soundcard or PC speaker (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 23:02:14 EST
The problem with using a soundcard output to a mic input is not in the programming aspect, but is a question of efficiency and possibly power dissipation. Guys who key Class C, D, and E amplifiers ha
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00461.html (8,799 bytes)

88. Re: LF: PLL inaccuracy (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 20:46:26 EST
<< Allow me to quote from the book "Phase Locked Loops, Principle and Practice", McGraw Hill 1996, by P.V. Brennan University College, London. Page 22: "...As far as the control loop is concerned, it
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00550.html (9,306 bytes)

89. Re: LF: G3AQC complete call Q5 in USA (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 23:01:28 EST
Amazing! Congratulations, Dexter and Laurie.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00594.html (8,827 bytes)

90. Re: LF: Re: PLL filter for BPSK (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:06:44 EST
Rye Gewalt writes: << I always thought that was a standard method of demodulating phase information....>> (and) [email protected] writes: << This approach may have applicability to detection of weak
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-03/msg00015.html (8,125 bytes)

91. Re: LF: RE: WOLF (BPSK) modulation continuous phase modulation. (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 09:59:25 EST
<< What happens if you send a BPSK (instant phase switching) as reference signal to a PLL ? >> An interesting thought. (Apologies to everyone for the previous message which ended at this point. I was
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-03/msg00029.html (10,105 bytes)

92. Re: LF: RE: WOLF (BPSK) modulation continuous phase modulation. (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 11:32:24 EST
<< But unfortunately, any clipping or AGC will distort the amplitude envelope, which in turn will re-introduce unwanted sidebands. >> This may be a matter of semantics, but clipping won't actually "r
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-03/msg00036.html (10,809 bytes)

93. Re: LF: RE: WOLF (BPSK) modulation continuous phase modulation. (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 10:12:34 EST
<< So if one would send a 'rude BPSK' signal (as is created with an XOR gate) through a resonant LC-circuit you will get continuous phase shift at the output. The phase shift time will depend on the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-03/msg00050.html (10,140 bytes)

94. Re: LF: <Tech> BPSK and bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 00:41:03 EST
<< We must not be trapped into thinking that bandwidths close to those used for QRSS are essential. >> An interesting thought. Spectrum usage depends on more than just the bandwidth of a signal, afte
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-03/msg00064.html (9,276 bytes)

95. Re: LF: Zip files (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:08:53 EST
<< There is also the danger of accidental execution in the browser. >> I always suspected I might expire while waiting for graphics-intensive pages to load, but this could represent a whole new dange
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-03/msg00229.html (7,996 bytes)

96. Re: LF: Transatlantic Challenge: the Canadian / Europe contacts (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 14:03:30 EST
<< Apart from congratulating all concerned, I hope you meant the FCC. The Federal Aviation Authority might take a very long time dealing with a ham radio matter!! >> Oh, I don't know. The FAA conside
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-03/msg00252.html (10,040 bytes)

97. Re: LF: Transatlantic Challenge: the Canadian / Europe contacts (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 13:58:03 EST
Splendid news, and a fine decision. Congratulations to all concerned! John, KD4IDY
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-03/msg00253.html (9,548 bytes)

98. Re: LF: QRS v3.05 (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 17:01:56 EST
Thanks, Rik, for another splendid piece of software! It will be available from the lwca.org site this weekend. 73, John
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-03/msg00315.html (7,414 bytes)

99. Re: LF: Re: <TECH>Re: Transcontinental modes - what next? (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 21:31:58 EST
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-03/msg00326.html (7,576 bytes)

100. Re: LF: Re: Spectrum of Wolf signal (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 12:42:45 EDT
Now if only we could combine the ease of Argo with the best of Wolf....Wolargo? : ) >> Hmmm. Rather a long name, Steve. And, since the signal has a "growly" sound, it would go a long way toward makin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-04/msg00226.html (8,262 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu