Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 275 ]

Total 275 documents matching your query.

161. Re: LF: Dont open "Larry Kayer" msg VIRUS (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 13:34:47 EDT
<< Or is it now possible to generate a completely fictitious communication path header? Alternatively the originator may be in blissfully ignorance? I would be grateful if someone would comment.>> Al
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00369.html (9,163 bytes)

162. Re: LF: EARTH RESISTANCE (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:32:01 EST
<< Dick has indicated that Earth Resistance gets higher when the ground is wet. That seems strange and contrary to accepted theory. The ideal ground plane for a vertical is on a wet plain or preferab
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00278.html (11,450 bytes)

163. Re: LF: Re: Measuring earth resistance (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:06:31 EST
For example, if one had a loop antenna suspended in free space, would the ground loss resistance become zero? If one has ANY kind of antenna suspended in free space, the ground loss becomes zero. [gr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00288.html (8,718 bytes)

164. Re: LF: Measuring earth resistance (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:53:09 EST
<< Thanks John for a perfect reproduction! >> You are most welcome. John
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00289.html (8,848 bytes)

165. Re: LF: Measuring earth resistance (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 15:28:35 EST
Dick Rollema's noise bridge schematic and a photo of his assembled unit can now be downloaded from: http://lwca.org/library/articles/pa0se/earth/ 73 John Davis
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00316.html (9,332 bytes)

166. Re: LF: Measuring earth resistance (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 01:30:08 EST
Sorry, all. I meant to send that response directly to Dick. Sometimes my mail client chooses its own reply-to address rules, seemingly at random, and I don't always notice before clicking on Send. Jo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00336.html (9,837 bytes)

167. Re: LF: Measuring earth resistance (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 01:24:18 EST
<< In the first version of this e-mail the circuit diagram was included but it did not pass the reflector. >> Hi Dick, As usual, I'll be happy to host the diagram on the LWCA site if you'd like to ha
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00337.html (9,967 bytes)

168. Re: LF: Re: Notch for DCF39 [G3NYK] (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:09:08 EST
<< This is the wrong way to achieve high impedance (and good IMD), it is no need to keep the "source current low" {etc} >> I do not see anything in the Web page that suggests keeping the source curre
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-01/msg00109.html (8,612 bytes)

169. Re: LF: Eu/Alaska (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 00:10:14 EST
(In regard to Echolink) I see no reason why you couldn't connect your rcvr to one end and ARGO to the other to create a really remote rcv site. Would allow true real time viewing from Alaska to GB as
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-02/msg00128.html (9,087 bytes)

170. Re: LF: EH-Antenna (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:09:39 EST
<< If the loss of efficiency will be abt. 10dB compared to a fullsize-dipol(measured at 1.8MHz!) then it would be a hope for all lowfers with large aereas and tolerant neighborhood :-) >> I suppose i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-02/msg00180.html (8,715 bytes)

171. Re: LF: Re: TA 28 March (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 17:34:35 EST
Nada. >> So, we do speak Spanish?
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00031.html (7,685 bytes)

172. Re: LF: POUR LES FRANCOPHONES (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 20:12:30 EST
Merci, Daniel. John
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00101.html (8,481 bytes)

173. LF: Anyone else missing messages? (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 11:29:12 EST
Just out of curiosity, have others been missing messages posted to this reflector? I can be sure it's not due to an over-active spam filter on my e-mail account. (AOL are blindly enamored of their gl
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00216.html (8,158 bytes)

174. Re: LF: censure (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 12:28:42 EDT
<< just to say that after my forward of Ted's revision of Ohm's law i did not receive more mail from yahoo eh-forum. >> Heretics, infidels, and non-believers always have a difficult life, Valerio. Ho
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00058.html (7,873 bytes)

175. LF: Re: Amidon Cores (slightly diverging...) (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 18:41:10 EDT
Never believe anything you hear or see!!!!!!!!! Too many pretentious experts not surprisingly from the South, and often adamant that they are right!!!!!!!! >> Sounds like the car dealer radio adverts
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00100.html (8,322 bytes)

176. LF: Re: EH Loop (with off-topic addendum) (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 01:25:45 EDT
In a message dated 4/20/03 6:37:57 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: It seem there is onother device for radiating on 137 kHz, it is the EH loop from the same original mind of th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00146.html (16,544 bytes)

177. Re: LF: No LF Band in US (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 17:21:09 EDT
<< yes the FCC can, and does grant "Part 15" licenses. In fact AMRAD has held such a license to transmit on 136 kHz for several years >> A slight typo here. I believe Andre' is referring to Part 5 of
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-05/msg00054.html (9,319 bytes)

178. Re: LF: No US Ham Band (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 01:58:53 EDT
<< well, John, we have the best politicians, money can buy! >> Or rent. :-) John
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-05/msg00074.html (8,745 bytes)

179. Re: LF: No US Ham Band (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 16:50:39 EDT
<< Obviously more and more of some government's decisions are directly influenced by the power of industries and large companies! >> It reminds me of a time several years ago, Geri, when a reporter o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-05/msg00076.html (9,744 bytes)

180. LF: No US Ham Band (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 20:18:45 EDT
Sorry, doesn't look like we'll be joining the rest of the world on LF any time soon. The Federal Communications Commission turned down a US ham band at 136kHz for the foreseeable future. There's a st
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-05/msg00087.html (8,728 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu