Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 275 ]

Total 275 documents matching your query.

141. Re: LF: Loop Amperage ~~~~~~ (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 22:05:32 EDT
<< So, it appears that all I am doing, when power limited like this, is to spread out the 1KW power loss over a larger portion of the back woods! But at least it's doable. Comments, please. >>
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-05/msg00015.html (8,081 bytes)

142. Re: LF: Re: Decca component (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 15:21:25 EDT
I tend to agree with Rye and David. I'm not at all familiar with the Decca gear, but a varistor directly across a transistor is a protection technique I've seen used elsewhere in RF amplifiers. Its i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-05/msg00034.html (7,847 bytes)

143. LF: VLF Transmission? (slightly off topic) (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 14:03:31 EDT
Just wondering if any members of the group can confirm a scheduled commemorative transmission of the Alexanderson alternator at SAQ on 30 June? I have a report to that effect, but the www.telemuseum.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-05/msg00070.html (8,182 bytes)

144. Re: LF: US FCC NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE MAKING, Comments (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 13:58:35 EDT
<< Do you think it would be useful to send this type of comment directly to the FCC, or would it be better to do it via AMRAD/LWCA/ARRL etc? >> My personal assessment of the situation is that it woul
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-05/msg00071.html (9,314 bytes)

145. Re: LF: US FCC NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE MAKING, Comments (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 16:47:51 EDT
<< If the rules as proposed (1 Watt EIRP, 100 Watt PEP) becomes true, it might be very difficult to find any future partner stations for transatlantic QSOs. >> I also join Andre' in urging internatio
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-05/msg00083.html (9,787 bytes)

146. Re: LF: USA 136kHz proposals (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 11:35:29 EDT
<< I am puzzled why they are putting this stipulation on bandwidth, which I do not believe anybody else has done. >> You've heard of the philosophy some folks have over here? The one about: "the busi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-05/msg00107.html (9,620 bytes)

147. Re: LF: FW: Programming !!!HELP!!! (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 17:03:23 EDT
<< Have a look at Power Basic, produced by Spectra Publishing. When Borland decided not to continue with Turbo Basic in th eearly 1090s, this organisation took it over and developed PB into a very go
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-06/msg00091.html (8,393 bytes)

148. Re: LF: Re: Activity from DLF?s 360m mast (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 17:32:55 EDT
I agree with Rik it's a great opportunity to make some measurements with a real aerial... >> A very good point. If actual measurements are performed, it could be an eye opening experience to compare
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-07/msg00162.html (8,172 bytes)

149. Re: LF: 166.5 kHz Beacon (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 09:32:08 EDT
<< Unfortunately that frequency is swamped by European BC sidebands. My noise level is about 30dBuV in 300Hz all night.....almost the strength I received CFH running 20kW....so I dont think there is
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-07/msg00240.html (8,092 bytes)

150. Re: LF: Oscillator Stabilty for QRSS? (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:38:59 EDT
<< I am worried about drift but also thinking that they may be stable enough if kept in the 1 - 2MHz region. As well, they should (if identical) drift by the same amount and thus be self-correcting?
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-08/msg00092.html (9,374 bytes)

151. Re: LF: Re: Mike's insulators ?? (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:04:02 EST
I found a good corona warning was given by a VHF broadcast radio left on while operating on LF - if coronoa appears, lots of loud crackles and pops are heard. >> Ah! So there is some practical use f
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00004.html (8,038 bytes)

152. Re: LF: Read carefully (urgent--etc. (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 22:29:46 EST
<< this latest proposal will give me an opportunity to become even richer than I was :-) >> Was...past tense? I take your meaning to be, then, that you were richer before responding to the previous m
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00023.html (8,613 bytes)

153. LF: Re: IEE Paper (on-line) (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 22:10:20 EST
<< As requested, here is a copy of my paper for the IEE. Could someone post on a website please, then advertise the address on the LF reflector. Please note note that the copyright requires any furth
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00025.html (8,241 bytes)

154. Re: LF: Spam via reflector (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 12:36:15 EST
<< There are two approaches to requiring registration. Either it's automatic, or it's manual controlled by the list owner. If it is controlled by the list owner, this can be quite a lot of work and t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00078.html (10,115 bytes)

155. Re: LF: Spam via reflector (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:11:04 EDT
<< Perhaps the time has come to change this reflector into a 'subscribers only can post' system. Despite objections raised in the past most other mailing lists operate that way and it certainly would
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00111.html (9,992 bytes)

156. Re: LF: alternative antenna for 136kHz (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:04:18 EDT
Hi Rik, Looks to me as if the net result is simply going to be a small loop in series with a series-resonant circuit. If antenna dimensions are an appreciable fraction of a wavelength, lumped reactan
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00126.html (9,410 bytes)

157. Re: LF: RE: Re: Re: Ant Questions (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:42:02 EDT
My experience with many shapes of top hats is that it DOES Is that in comparison with no top loading at all, or purely horizontal top loading? That's in comparison with horizontal top loading. If a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00182.html (9,732 bytes)

158. Re: LF: Virus Hoax. (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:32:54 EDT
<< Didn't a false alarm like this occur some month ago ? >> Yes it did, with this very same file. Also on a couple of occasions ranging as far back as 18 moths or so, with a file named sulfnbk.exe (a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00183.html (7,778 bytes)

159. Re: LF: USA.136 (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:09:45 EDT
<< Reading Dave's recent message it looks like 136 khz is not yet available in the USA. >> Correct. Given the slow, methodical nature of the FCC's procedures, late winter was the earliest most observ
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00229.html (7,848 bytes)

160. Re: LF: Dont open "Larry Kayer" msg VIRUS (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 14:28:41 EDT
<< Well, my virus checker didn't spot it. Probably it needs to be updated. I read the message, but did nothing about the attachment. Then, after reading the warnings, I deleted that message alltogeth
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00367.html (10,012 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu