Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 3340 ]

Total 3340 documents matching your query.

61. Re: LF: VLF (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 09:37:32 +0100
Why a ballon? If you want to keep it reasonably stable in the sky you need a LOT of helium and a BIG ballon. And i assume nobody wants to use hydrogen instead of helium when operating with some 10kV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00264.html (10,484 bytes)

62. Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:48:49 +0100
Thank you for your report Paul. It reads very scientific if compared to my report, hi ;-) I'll keep rather writing as a fascinated dreamer who wants to share the euphoria with the others. But you do
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00309.html (12,998 bytes)

63. Re: LF: Re: 9kHz noise level (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:28:39 +0100
Am 03.03.2010 12:50, schrieb Paul Nicholson: Yes, given a low Z source - no good for E-field rx. On the input of the E-field antenna i use a JFET (BF862), then a narrow band pass filter and after tha
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00325.html (10,706 bytes)

64. LF: VLF WEB SDR (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:35:08 +0100
The web sdr at http://websdr.pa3weg.nl/ does not show the alpha beacons, almost not. Why? Others explained that they can receive them with 20dB SNR? Stefan/DK7FC
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00340.html (10,522 bytes)

65. Re: LF: TX- Loop for 136kHz (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:26:02 +0100
But Uwe, With a 100m Vertical you reach 1W ERP with 20W TX power! So 1,2kW will be 60W ERP on 137kHz ;-) If you think about the ratio between achieved signal to the effort you have, this may be an al
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00375.html (9,134 bytes)

66. Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:38:13 +0100
Am 16.03.2010 14:08, schrieb Paul Nicholson: Thanks, that was a good field trip in the best amateur radio tradition. Ironic how we are at the same time using the most hi-tech, but also the simple bat
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00409.html (16,063 bytes)

67. Re: LF: 9kHz: soundcard RX (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:15:38 +0100
Hello Horst, This is the soundcard: http://shop.zeg-shop.de/shop/index.asp?id=120340&sid=2670421779 It costs 8,99 Euro ;-) It is nothing special but the advantage is that it is not installed in my no
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00431.html (10,112 bytes)

68. Re: LF: Minimum content of a valid QRSS/DFCW QSO? (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:00:10 +0200
The next important step is to convince DF6NM (and others) to buy such a kite! ;-) 73, Stefan Am 30.03.2010 10:50, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: Hi Johan, You are right but first i think (and hope) there wi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00487.html (13,162 bytes)

69. Re: LF: Re: DK7FC's 3rd VLF transmission (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:18:27 +0100
Very nice! 0,8m*0,8m is really practicable and easy to built for everyone. Not expensive too... And our distance is 655km, well above the garden ;-) I do not even see a too big difference in S/N comp
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00546.html (16,367 bytes)

70. Re: Congrats: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:29:12 +0100
Tnx for all of your congrats! :-) This is a screenshot of DF8ZR/Bernd's reception in QRSS30 mode in a distance of 16km. DK7FC/P The RXers side is most important. A well optimised receiver, such as Pa
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00661.html (12,944 bytes)

71. Re: LF: Re: AW: 9kHz loop/preamp for soundcard receiver (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:42:38 +0100
Dear Jim, group, OK so far. And what do you think will be the most suitable TX antenna type? The standard marconi as i will try it, with all its disadvantages (high coil and earth losses, high voltag
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00716.html (12,658 bytes)

72. Re: LF: vlf stuff (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:03:12 +0200
Hi Laurence, Fine! Do you wish to receive an amateur radio signal there down once time? Take a look on my dreamers band grabber (http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber.html).
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00010.html (11,125 bytes)

73. Re: VLF: 8,97kHz / dreamers band grabber, another one... (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:25:58 +0200
... i have added the ALPHA line on 11904,762 now to the grabber... 73, Stefan/DK7FC
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00020.html (11,449 bytes)

74. Re: LF: Dreamers Band update from W1VLF (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:53:10 +0200
Hi Paul, VLF, Am 17.04.2010 17:58, schrieb Paul A. Cianciolo: I wonder if you can point me to the schematic of your final amplifier? It would be nice to learn from amplifier building experience. Yes,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00103.html (12,928 bytes)

75. Re: VLF: 8,97 kHz active antenna circuit and pictures (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:23:50 +0200
Hello Horst, Sorry, for the bugs. The 2nd JFET is also a BF862, yes. RG174 is just an example, you can use any coaxial cable or maybe twisted pair cable. "This evening" should have been "This weekend
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00196.html (12,959 bytes)

76. Re: LF: RE: RE: RE: W1VLF 9 Khz Antenna update Putting inductance near the top. (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 11:03:17 +0200
Hi Rik, Yes, sure ;-) But i worry, that someone elso than me has to try this since it will rather be problematic to place my water barrel 70m up on the kite, HI. I am sure the effect/improvement will
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00199.html (14,295 bytes)

77. Re: LF: LWBC Carrier QRGs on 153KHz (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:26:08 +0200
Am 21.04.2010 06:19, schrieb Scott Tilley: Has anyone had a look on 153KHz and noted the relative QRG positions of the various broadcasters within EU on 153KHz? If so would you mind sending me your r
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00253.html (9,214 bytes)

78. LF/VLF: SV8GXC, welcome! (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:08:56 +0200
Hello George, So, welcome to the reflector!! I can read out your motivation in the text! Be sure you can get all needed informations to get QRV on LF. I am sure there are many people who will be inte
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00306.html (18,830 bytes)

79. Re: LF: RE: RE: W1VLF 9 Khz Antenna update Putting inductance near the top. (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 11:26:25 +0200
Paul, If you have not yet read much about LF/VLF antennas (for TX) i recommend the website of Rik/ON7YD: http://www.strobbe.eu/on7yd/136ant/ There, you get all basic necessary informations for becomi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00307.html (20,584 bytes)

80. Re: LF: RE: RE: W1VLF 9 Khz Antenna update Putting inductance near the top. (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 13:15:33 +0200
Hi Rik, No, i do not have any filtering yet. And i do not even know the impedance level of the PA output / antenna input. I assume, it is below 50 Ohm. Let me calculate: With the used PA ferrite core
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00324.html (13,858 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu