Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:: 50 ]

Total 50 documents matching your query.

1. RE: LF: Receivers for LF and MF 136 KHz @ 477KHz ??? (score: 1)
Author: REEVES Paul <>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 07:49:37 +0100
Hi Graham, RA17 with beam deflection mixer? Surely not....... I would certainly agree with you about the RA1772 (and extended family) but I like using both - and a (fairly) complete set of RA17/MA79
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-08/msg00038.html (15,725 bytes)

2. RE: LF: Receivers for LF and MF 136 KHz @ 477KHz ??? (score: 1)
Author: REEVES Paul <>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 12:47:34 +0100
Hi Graham, I don't think the '117 had a beam deflection mixer either but I'm not sure. I've got one in the garage awaiting (for several years now....) renovation - will have to have a look. I didn't
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-08/msg00041.html (19,883 bytes)

3. LF: RE: Receiver information (score: 1)
Author: REEVES Paul <>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 08:03:13 +0100
Hi Marc, The rx is an ex-Royal Navy type CFD - I think! Used in submarines about 2 generations before the current fit. I have the complete technical manual for it but only in paper form, not electron
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-10/msg00271.html (10,562 bytes)

4. LF: RE: Receiver information (score: 1)
Author: REEVES Paul <>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 08:45:16 +0100
Whoops! Type CJD, sorry..... Manufactured by Murphy, I think, but I could not find a manufacturers nameplate on mine. 73's Paul G8GJA Hello all, I m looking for information about this VLF receiver. P
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-10/msg00272.html (10,304 bytes)

5. LF: RE: Power monitoring at LF? (score: 1)
Author: REEVES Paul <>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 08:21:26 +0100
There are some that go down to 200kHz but these are for the 'high sensitivity' 4410 range (just looks like a 43) which implies they might need a bit of power ...... borne out by the power range going
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-07/msg00093.html (10,116 bytes)

6. RE: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Re: VLF: GOTA (score: 1)
Author: REEVES Paul <>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 10:44:24 +0000
Hi David, Several points of contention here your description of Project sanguine is incorrect in some details (but you can blame Wikipedia for that). It was, in fact, rather like the antenna you so s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-01/msg00085.html (26,047 bytes)

7. RE: LF: RADCOM (score: 1)
Author: Reeves Paul <>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 08:33:12 +0100
How about the strange new appearances? I was intrigued by 'Radio Sports' and had visions of pole vaulting with 136KHz verticals, throwing the FT817 and weight lifting with the R-390. But no, just mor
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00358.html (11,486 bytes)

8. LF: RE: Fw: [amateur-radio] Funeral Coverage Satellite details (score: 1)
Author: Reeves Paul <>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:31:40 +0100
What has this to do with lf?? Paul Reeves G8GJA thanks for info..so glad my family in england and other KIWIS should be able to see the state funeral of our sir ed hillary..i was one of the hams luck
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-01/msg00337.html (13,826 bytes)

9. RE: LF: TA on 500kHz (score: 1)
Author: Reeves Paul <>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 08:59:33 +0100
Mal, The fact that you have rather firm opinions is, by now, rather obvious. This should, naturally, not be restricted in any way and nobody seeks to do so. The manner in which you express them is an
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-03/msg00177.html (13,623 bytes)

10. LF: RE: ZAP (score: 1)
Author: Reeves Paul <>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 08:13:13 +0100
And just why would only CW radios survive?? This is news - EMP will ONLY take out SSB/FM/AM radios!! As usual Mal lives in his own little world. Paul G8GJA A recent newspaper report indicates a certa
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-05/msg00050.html (10,021 bytes)

11. LF: RE: Re: RE: ZAP (score: 1)
Author: Reeves Paul <>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 08:35:18 +0100
Oh Dear, it goes on..... Your little world is obviously CW oriented. That's all. On the subject of qualifications - I'm not getting into this one. Apples and Oranges. Paul G8GJA Bigger than you think
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-05/msg00110.html (12,699 bytes)

12. LF: RE: Re: RE: ZAP (score: 1)
Author: Reeves Paul <>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 15:22:09 +0100
Hmmm, First, I might take some exception to the 'real radio amateurs with CW skills' but I'll let it pass. What makes you think that everything else will be zapped? Simple precautions will prevent da
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-05/msg00119.html (13,937 bytes)

13. LF: RE: RADCOM (score: 1)
Author: Reeves Paul <>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:02:08 +0100
And for some, spelling lessons...... Paul G8GJA --Original Message-- From: mal hamilton [mailto:] Sent: 18 July 2008 11:46 To: rsgb Subject: LF: RADCOM Latest copy. In depth disc
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-07/msg00020.html (10,727 bytes)

14. LF: RE: RADCOM (score: 1)
Author: Reeves Paul <>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 07:56:54 +0100
Mal, Since you use the term rather a lot and I think we would all be interested, just what is your definition of an 'appliance operator' ? regards, Paul G8GJA --Original Message-- From: mal hamilton
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-07/msg00082.html (10,144 bytes)

15. RE: LF: 500 khz TX (score: 1)
Author: Reeves Paul <>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:11:15 +0100
Graham, Don't knock it - whatever might be thought of Mal's opinion of 'real amateurs' vs 'appliance operators' (and Mal is on record as having equipment of far eastern origin..) there is nothing wro
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-07/msg00143.html (12,968 bytes)

16. RE: LF: new cw yahoo group (score: 1)
Author: Reeves Paul <>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:58:52 +0100
Are they still allowed to use Bunsen burners? I would think the 'Health & Safety' legislation would have done away with them - just think of the risk assessment (remembering burnt lines down the cent
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00064.html (11,859 bytes)

17. LF: RE: 500 CONDX (score: 1)
Author: Reeves Paul <>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 07:49:26 +0100
IC746, Mal ?? Hmmm .... sounds like an appliance...... Paul G8GJA --Original Message-- From: mal hamilton [mailto:] Sent: 08 September 2008 00:24 To: rsgb Subject: LF: 500 CONDX
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-09/msg00308.html (10,381 bytes)

18. RE: LF: QSO MODE (score: 1)
Author: Reeves Paul <>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 12:58:01 +0100
So here we go again. Marine radio operators are the 'creme de la creme' and have tried and developed everything and radio amateurs - probably an emphasis on 'amateur' from Mal's point of view - are o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-11/msg00288.html (13,343 bytes)

19. RE: LF: RE: DEGEN 1103 (score: 1)
Author: Reeves Paul <>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 12:34:16 +0100
Hi Mal, Farnell www.farnellinone.com , several different versions available from ADI or TI. DIL versions (probably easier to breadboard than the SMT versions) are from 1-80 to 3-90. No minimum orde
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00678.html (15,262 bytes)

20. LF: RE: Ferrite toroid cores using HEM series materials (score: 1)
Author: Reeves Paul <>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:13:44 +0100
Hi John, Enclosed is the data from Maplin on these cores. Hope this is ok, not been able to find any more data. regards, Paul Reeves G8GJA Technical Specification Order Part Max Max Min Attenuation (
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00498.html (11,544 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu