Mail Archive Search: <+from:LAURIE@g3aqc.freeserve.co.uk>

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 686 ]

Total 686 documents matching your query.

81. LF: Argo Beta 1 Release. (score: 1): Author: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 11:27:30 +0100; Hi Alberto, Unloaded Argo Beta1 last night,very impressed,easy to use for both wideband watch and QRS. Very poor signal from VE1ZZ but made out several characters on the 3Sec. setting. Thanks and a H; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00047.html (7,719 bytes)
82. LF: Re: lf 2 way (score: 1): Author: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 16:52:38 +0100; Seems like a great idea to me John.There are now several more stations getting closer to the 1W limit than when you saw Dave G0MRF and peter back in September.Sop lets have a go.Best wishes for the N; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00104.html (8,178 bytes)
83. LF: Re.Re.VE1ZZ etc (score: 1): Author: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 11:53:37 +0100; Hi Mal and All, Yes of course its easier to get power into a large/high antenna,and if its on good ground with miles of radials and not surrounded by trees etc,less power will be lost .BUT as amateur; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00108.html (7,937 bytes)
84. LF: Re. VE1ZZ (score: 1): Author: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 01:18:15 +0100; Jacks signals strength O, again here tonight 0000 UTC. Laurie.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00124.html (8,410 bytes)
85. LF: Re. VE1ZZ (score: 1): Author: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2000 15:52:12 +0100; He is wrong! Theory and experiment confirrm that 1W ERP is 1W ERP irrespective of the sise /height of the ant. (or anything else for that matter). Merry Xmas to all. Laurie.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00129.html (8,450 bytes)
86. LF: Re. VE1ZZ (score: 1): Author: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2000 11:37:01 +0100; Hi Valerio, No copy here last night either! also high static level.Dont despair! Have a happy Christmas. Laurie.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00133.html (8,397 bytes)
87. LF: Re. VE1ZZ (score: 1): Author: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 13:13:11 +0100; Hi all, The best signal was at 0000 for about 5mins,later at 0030 it had fallen to T .Pity since I was trying to get the best out of Spectrogram.I think I prefer 60db but didnt finish,Hi. Still, grea; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00149.html (8,602 bytes)
88. LF: Re. VE1ZZ (score: 1): Author: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 01:14:00 +0100; Hi All Qrs signals again visible strength O here tonite at 0000 this really is good! 73s Laurie.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00157.html (8,426 bytes)
89. LF: Re. VE1ZZ Transmissio (score: 1): Author: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 11:29:32 +0100; Hi John, Many thanks for the images on your web site-the spectran(first one) is similar to the image I recieved,but your spectrogram is really excellent.Would you mind giving the settings you used?I; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00167.html (8,006 bytes)
90. LF: Re. VE1ZZ (score: 1): Author: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 01:51:28 +0100; VE1ZZ readable here at 2330, not so good now (0030) but still visible. 73s Laurie.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00172.html (8,401 bytes)
91. LF: Re. VE1ZZ on 136 (score: 1): Author: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 12:23:49 +0100; Well done Peter and Jack, as Mike says just got to get together now for a 2 way. Merry Christmas to all. 73s Laurie.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00201.html (7,682 bytes)
92. LF: Re. CFH last night (score: 1): Author: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 12:13:18 +0100; Hi Alan/Rik and all, I plotted CFH last night ,they switched off at 2345 but came on at 0000 with a very good signal.Best sustained peak 0600-0800. Could mean that our best chance is for an early mor; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00234.html (7,747 bytes)
93. LF: Re: Guard Circuit (score: 1): Author: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 20:24:05 +0100; Yes please Jim, I am considering an 800W amp so this guard circuit could be very useful. 73s Laurie --Original Message-- From: James Moritz <[email protected]> To: [email protected] <; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00244.html (10,694 bytes)
94. LF: Re: RE: Guard Circuit (score: 1): Author: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 20:23:18 +0100; Yes please Jim, I am thinking about an 800W amplifier and this Guard circuit could be very useful.73s Laurie. --Original Message-- From: Talbot Andrew <[email protected]> To: 'rsgb_lf_group@blacks; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00245.html (12,121 bytes)
95. LF: Re. LF Weekend Report. (score: 1): Author: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 10:41:55 +0100; Hi Steve, Heard a good strong 599 signal from you but had to go out so didnt call. Address for F6BWO:- J.F.Courtot 28 Rue d Alsace 52000 Chaumont Happy Christmas to you and all . Laurie.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00259.html (7,725 bytes)
96. LF: Re. 73/136 (score: 1): Author: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 22:15:40 +0100; Hi Ko, Many thanks for the report and atachments, looks like a nice clean signal. 73s Laurie.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00268.html (7,627 bytes)
97. LF: Re. The old LF source book. (score: 1): Author: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 22:22:55 +0100; I would never have got started on LF without it. Thanks Peter. 73s Laurie.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00273.html (7,734 bytes)
98. LF: Re. 73/136 (score: 1): Author: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 20:23:46 +0100; Whoops just had a look at the band and SXV is all over the 135700-135800 segment.So will QSY to 135973. Still no sign of CFH.! 73s Laurie; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00275.html (7,789 bytes)
99. LF: Re. 73/136 etc (score: 1): Author: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 19:41:59 +0100; Thanks Jim for my first 2way contact on 73KHz,looks like I need to improve the Rx side of things, a few more signals would be a help Hi. Condx on 136 appear to be good at present (CFH let me down las; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00277.html (8,195 bytes)
100. LF: Re.73KHz rpt. (score: 1): Author: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 00:46:41 +0100; Hi Alan, Yes I was on 71.69 CW (later DFCW) I worked M0BMU on QRSS with nice 000 signal although only just audible,mebbe need to improve my Rx capability.Saw G3YXM also very good signal.Thanks for th; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00292.html (7,995 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]