Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 794 ]

Total 794 documents matching your query.

301. Re: LF: Please give us some signals... (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 14:05:28 +0000
Dear Jim and group, the fair opens at 08:00 UTC and closes at 18:00 UTC both Saturday and Sunday... Dear LF Group, Unfortunately, a couple of problems have cropped up - First, my antenna has blown do
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00076.html (9,696 bytes)

302. Re: LF: Please give us some signals... (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 18:24:16 +0000
At 18:19 25/01/2002 +0100, you wrote: Hello Group, as the subject of this message says, I am gently reminding you to put some signals (QRSS, DFCW, Jason...) on the LF band for our hamfest of Saturday
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00088.html (9,054 bytes)

303. LF: Jason Tests Tonight (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 17:37:30 +0000
Dear LF Group, Will run the Jason beacon again this evening from about 2300 for a few hours. Frequency 135.990kHz +/-. All reports welcome. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00089.html (7,656 bytes)

304. LF: Re: LF antenna gain (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 15:21:23 +0000
Gain is only obtained from directivity. Directivity can be calculated from physical considerations but the equation to obtain gain from directivity is G = e*D , where G = power gain, D = directivity,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00092.html (14,927 bytes)

305. LF: Sigs from G3JKV and OH1TN (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:37:56 +0000
Dear LF Group, I copied G3JKV's 2W Jason beacon signal without problems last night - The signal was S6 here, so no great difficulty! After that, I had a CW QSO with OH1TN. Reino remarked that he had
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00097.html (8,620 bytes)

306. LF: Re: Jason Tests signalling comparison (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 18:45:02 +0000
Dear Andy, LF Group, At 14:54 24/01/2002 +0000, you wrote: All three of these modes use the same basic technique, looking for the presence or absence of a signal in a given bandwidth - in the case of
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00105.html (10,942 bytes)

307. LF: No Jason Tests Tonight (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:41:27 +0000
Dear LF Group, No beacon sigs from M0BMU tonight - I'm taking the night off! Will run some more tests over the weekend, so if you have anything particular in mind, please let me know. Cheers, Jim Mor
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00106.html (8,091 bytes)

308. LF: Re: Jason Tests (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 12:43:45 +0000
Dear LF Group, Many thanks for the reports on the Jason beacon sigs last night from OE5EEP, SM6LKM, I2PHD, IK2PII, CT1DRP, and to anyone else who was listening . I started late, about 2015, after hav
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00113.html (11,772 bytes)

309. Re: LF: Jason Tests (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 18:08:39 +0000
Dear LF Group, I'll try to run the Jason beacon from about 2000utc until 2100 or so on 135.910kHz, and from 2300 until 0100 or later on 135.990kHz, just for a change and to see if this frequency is a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00133.html (9,288 bytes)

310. Re: LF: Jason Tests (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 15:57:55 +0000
May I look at it the other way? 137.5xxx is an absolute mass of lines here. 73, Brian 73 Brian CT1DRP IN51QD 41 09 58N 08 39 11W http://homepage.esoterica.pt/~brian Dear Brian, So if I transmit a bea
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00141.html (11,233 bytes)

311. Re: LF: Jason Tests (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:45:40 +0000
Dear LF Group, Thanks to I2PHD, DJ8WX, NL9222, G3NYK for the reports and images, and to anybody else who was watching for my Jason v0.92 test sigs. I transmitted on 137.510 from about 2030 - 2210, an
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00154.html (10,799 bytes)

312. Re: LF: Jason Tests / PSK31 (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 19:12:51 +0000
Dear Mal, LF Group, At 18:36 22/01/2002 +0000, you wrote: Dont swamp the QRS operators with 4hz B/W signal around 135.923 plus/minus, this has happened before with the 7 level fsk, and is not appreci
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00167.html (10,284 bytes)

313. Re: LF: Big signal (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 18:51:32 +0000
Dear Mal, LF Group, At 14:20 22/01/2002 +0000, you wrote: Ref your recent power measurements on the MM0ALM signal and observations. I have measured you power and observed two readings. One set of fig
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00169.html (10,998 bytes)

314. LF: Jason Tests / PSK31 (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:01:59 +0000
Dear LF Group, I successfully tested Jason 0.92 with 1.2kW TX out last night (If anyone was listening, at around 0400 - don't ask!). So I will give it a go tonight if anyone is interested. I will try
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00173.html (9,990 bytes)

315. Re: LF: Big signal (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:48:16 +0000
Dear Mal, LF group, Of course, any self-respecting, competent CW operator (well, allright, CW and QRSS operator these days) would never consider anything less than a MERCEDES JEEP... Cheers, Jim Mori
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00194.html (9,848 bytes)

316. Re: LF: New BIG sig / Jason (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 12:18:51 +0000
Dear Walter, LF Group, Mal G3KEV has a competitor for the biggest 136 sig in the UK. I heard MM0ALM wkg DJ9IE yesterday and he was 8 dB stronger than 'KEV here although almost twice as far away. Said
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00201.html (10,001 bytes)

317. Re: LF: Jason Wednesday evening... (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:18:03 +0000
Hi Jim, I have been unable to reproduce this behaviour... even if changing center frequency while transmitting, everytime it worked ok. Of course the new frequency is used at the next tone time, but
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00244.html (10,727 bytes)

318. Re: LF: Introducing Jason (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 14:18:15 +0000
Dear Alberto, A query -What range of sound card audio frequencies can be used by Jason? Also, another "wouldn't it be nice if...." request to waste more of your valuable weekend - perhaps Jason could
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00250.html (10,226 bytes)

319. Re: LF: Jason Wednesday evening... (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:37:25 +0000
Dear Alberto, LF group, I tried version 0.91 of Jason on my 300MHz PC and also on a P133 - I was able to receive 'YXM on both, although only the "slow" mode worked on the 133MHz machine as you would
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00251.html (10,456 bytes)

320. Re: LF: Re: G3YXM's Jason test sigs (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 15:13:55 +0000
Dear Alberto, LF Group At 14:30 16/01/2002 +0100, you wrote: So, what would all you judge more important, sideband independence, or bandwidth used ? Your vote will decide the final format for Jason.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00283.html (11,558 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu