Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 220 ]

Total 220 documents matching your query.

161. RE: LF: Re: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and -32 (score: 1)
Author: Terry GW0EZY <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 22:47:05 +0100
Hi Stefan If you haven&#8217;t seen my messages yet then I&#8217;ll resend. For some reason, I never see any messages I post through BS unless someone responds. 73 Terry GW0EZY From: owner- rsgb_lf_g
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00810.html (19,259 bytes)

162. LF: RE: VO1NA OP32 TEST (score: 1)
Author: Terry GW0EZY <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 11:02:18 +0100
Graham When I looked at the CSV file in Excel downloaded through the link: http://pskreporter.info/cgi-bin/pskdata.pl?days=1&senderCallsign=vo1na It shows my reception of VO1NA as RX OP8 in the colum
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00816.html (8,770 bytes)

163. RE: LF: Re: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and -32 (score: 1)
Author: Terry GW0EZY <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:51:44 +0100
Stefan My SDR was set with a &#8220;Dial&#8221; QRG = 135.164 and an audio B/W = 2kHz so your sig at 136.164 should be in the centre. Here is the wave file recorded with SL using the file menu-&#8220
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00817.html (17,988 bytes)

164. LF: JT9-10 Decode DK7FC (score: 1)
Author: Terry GW0EZY <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 02:15:37 +0100
A decode of your JT9-10 transmission. I wonder why the Sync and dB values are shown as ** ?? 0100**   0.4 1138.38  0.00    DK7FC JN49IK  Waiting for JT9-30 ?? I thought you would prefer to stay with
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00063.html (15,721 bytes)

165. LF: JT9-2 QSO received (score: 1)
Author: Terry GW0EZY <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 17:04:14 +0100
JT9-2 complete QSO DF2JP DF6NM received here: 1538 4 -26 0.3 1429.54 0.00 CQ DF2JP JO31 1540 10 -23 -0.1 1418.71 0.00 DF2JP DF6NM -24 1542 1 -30 0.3 1432.47 0.00 1544 6 -25 -0.2 1418.63 0.00 DF2JP DF
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00084.html (11,443 bytes)

166. LF: JT9-30 137.440 (score: 1)
Author: Terry GW0EZY <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:27:39 +0100
On SL I am seeing a JT9-30 transmission(?) on 137.440 kHz. I've got WSJTX on frequency now but missed the first 2 x 30 minute transmissions and probably not enough of the third (in progress now) to d
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00094.html (10,731 bytes)

167. LF: G8HUH JT9-5 (score: 1)
Author: Terry GW0EZY <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:11:22 +0100
No copy from Stefan but received G8HUH: 2335 10 -15 0.4 1161.68 0.00 G8HUH IO81MG 73 GW0EZY
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00105.html (10,207 bytes)

168. LF: DF6NM Echo (score: 1)
Author: Terry GW0EZY <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:30:58 +0100
Sorry it wasn't an echo it was: 0015 10 -27 0.4 1155.33 0.00 DF2JP JO31JG Transmitting in the same period as DF6NM. After DF6NM stopped Tx, DF2JP decoded. I have reduced tolerance to +/-20 Hz and dec
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00126.html (9,505 bytes)

169. LF: DK7FC JT9-5 (score: 1)
Author: Terry GW0EZY <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:02:06 +0100
Rx now tuned to 136.3 and decode OK: 2350 10 1 0.7 1138.33 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK Strange to have this frequency offset when changing from JT9-2 to JT9-5 It took over 2 minutes to decode (Win7-32 2.84 GHz
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00148.html (10,286 bytes)

170. RE: LF: WSPR on LF (score: 1)
Author: Terry GW0EZY <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:37:01 +0630
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00173.html (13,195 bytes)

171. LF: DK7FC-DF6NM (score: 1)
Author: Terry GW0EZY <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:25:41 +0100
Screen shot of DK7FC and DF6NM https://dl.dropbox.com/u/10326787/DF6NM-DK7FC.jpg It seems that Markus has an echo approx 50 Hz hf. Echo not seen on Stefan&#8217;s signal 73 Terry
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00213.html (11,951 bytes)

172. LF: JT9-2 CAT (score: 1)
Author: Terry GW0EZY <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 00:13:55 +0100
Also here! 2308 10 -7 0.4 1438.38 0.00 I HAVE 2 CATS 73 Terry GW0EZY 2304 10 -20 0.3 1439.77 0.00 I HAVE 2 CATS LA5VNA Steinar loc:JO59jq Mal and spam filtering: STRONG www.opera.no
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00269.html (10,665 bytes)

173. LF: RE: WSJT-X v0.2, r2706 (score: 1)
Author: Terry GW0EZY <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:48:04 +0100
Joe Many thanks for the new version and for continuing to work on it under your difficult circumstances. Looking forward to the eventual upgrade of WSJT - especially handling soundcards without havin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00340.html (16,398 bytes)

174. RE: LF: no decodes, help needed (score: 1)
Author: Terry GW0EZY <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 16:40:09 +0100
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00439.html (15,495 bytes)

175. RE: LF: DK7FC-DF6NM (score: 1)
Author: Terry GW0EZY <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:42:29 +0100
Stefan getting regular decodes from you &#8211; every 10 minutes. Will also try your JT9-10. Let us all know if another frequency offset is required. 73 Terry PS: Joe K1JT is right &#8211; it would b
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00757.html (15,784 bytes)

176. RE: LF: JT9 what is the qso mode exactly ? (score: 1)
Author: Terry GW0EZY <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:48:27 +0100
Yes but its good fun Mal &#8211; I&#8217;m enjoying it &#8211; some new &#8220;appliance&#8221; to play with and see developing from the start &#8211; always gets me interested. If ham radio was just
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00783.html (27,191 bytes)

177. LF: RE: JT9-10 Decode DK7FC (score: 1)
Author: Terry GW0EZY <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 02:36:05 +0100
Decode OK but same again &#8211; Sync and dB values shown as ** (usually indicates values exceed expected) 0120**   0.9 1138.38  0.00    DK7FC JN49IK I have reduced the tolerance to +/- 10. I checked
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00810.html (18,696 bytes)

178. LF: RE: RE: [rsgb_lf_group] Computer time synchronisation / Dimension 4 (score: 1)
Author: Terry GW0EZY <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 22:31:24 +0100
I tried the Windows Registry modification of the "specialpollinterval" (I found an English webpage with the same instructions). However, after reading the following web page I'm not sure it does what
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00367.html (14,846 bytes)

179. RE: LF: Back to basics RTTY 45.45 / 85 Hz shift (score: 1)
Author: Terry GW0EZY <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:50:01 +0100
Copy so far ENS SEND OPERA 1234567890 RYRYRRRR QUICOWN FOXJUMP OVER THE LAZEYON DE G0NBD G0NBD G0NBD TESTINRW IIELK IO83LK 73 Terry From: [email protected] [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_grou
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00084.html (14,555 bytes)

180. RE: LF: Back to basics RTTY 45.45 / 85 Hz shift (score: 1)
Author: Terry GW0EZY <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:05:20 +0100
Getting better. It would be an easy CW QSO........! RYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYR 64646464646 SMART BEACONS SEND OPERA 1234567890 RYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYC THE
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-12/msg00088.html (19,336 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu