In a message dated 17/01/2008 17:52:36 GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes: Cracking signal here Gary, as you may have noticed. No sign of MRF, not seen often here at this hour, an
Hi Mark. No luck here with the grabber and AOL. text but no image at all just small box with red cross. Usually no problem here with Java etc. Thanks David In a message dated 01/01/2008 17:20:38 GMT
Hi Jay, You'll be able to watch all the European activity in near real time via the grabber in the Shetland isles. Obviously narrow bandwidths work best and although beacons are generally at the 503.
Sounds like that and 'Dimension 4' to keep the clock updated would be perfect. Thanks David G0MRF In a message dated 11/02/2008 16:21:26 GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes: On my web
Am I correct in assuming that the power increase is immediate and not from Feb 29th ?? David G0MRF In a message dated 01/02/2008 10:38:30 GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes: UK 500kHz NoV hold
In a message dated 30/05/2008 19:26:26 GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes: Dear all It's that time again.. I need news for the next Radcom LF column. What have you been working/building
What a lovely location. ! and what a perfect ground for a short antenna. David In a message dated 14/06/2008 01:28:41 GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes: A very neat small antenna for 500kHz!
In a message dated 18/07/2008 19:56:24 GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes: That's because no one sends anything in !!!!!!!!!!!!!! As I said in a previous posting a few months ago to
Hello John, WKL, and group. I think it may have been me who picked up Mal's _expression_ "fizzled out" and applied it to the technical content, in particular construction articles, in Rad Com. Trying
In a message dated 13/07/2008 22:10:42 GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes: Mal, try http://www.amsat.org 73 Johan SM6LKM mal hamilton wrote: > I have not seen any mention of satellite acty
In a message dated 06/08/2008 23:12:39 GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes: mal hamilton wrote: > I suppose the students cannot be blamed, since 1979 its their only > option, no alternativ
In a message dated 07/08/2008 10:31:28 GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes: David. It does not alter the facts as I specified before. A person with no knowledge about the subject could be
In a message dated 22/10/2008 11:01:36 GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes: I have an envelope which used to have toroids in. The label says '0.1-2MHz'. Why the LF limit please? 73, John
Interesting result Jim / Jay. I assume that the figure that varies between -17 and -23 is the receive value in dB. Given the observation about local noise then it may be the case that UK - USA could
In a message dated 31/12/2008 22:36:57 GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes: Hi David I've used JT65 to listen to cloud backscatter as well with a small laser radar system I built. If only so
Hi Andy. If the WSPR software has any sort of internal data storage for callsigns, then it may be showing the same 'characteristics' that cause so much trouble within the EME community. JT65 has a li
Hi Mal. Fort Perch Rock..........is at http://www.gb4imd.org.uk/fortperch.htm But precious little info on the station or it's plans or its licence duration / terms. A google search reveals some bante
Hi all. Can anyone on the East Coast USA comment of the state of 501 -504kHz for transatlantic reception? I have confirmed availability of a large field in East Sussex for this Sunday night for some
Hi all. Firstly, thank you to Jim and Chris for the QSOs yesterday and for the many useful reports and comments on the relector. Some detail. THE OBJECTIVE: To test the very good theory that horizont
