Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 237 ]

Total 237 documents matching your query.

161. Re: LF: Re: G4JNT and SM6LKM Jason beacons (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 12:13:49 EDT
Hi Alberto, I vote for the implementation of the optional limiter in Jason, even if it will delay the release of V0.95 a couple of days. If this really leads to a more immune system, perfetto - other
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-08/msg00134.html (7,813 bytes)

162. LF: SM6LKM Jason test on 40 m (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 10:08:09 EDT
Hi Johan, no idea what power you are running at the moment but it must be QRO.. (SM6LKM on 7000013 Hz, copied on Saturday, 14:00 UTC, hr JO42FD) The first quarter of the screenshot copied with the na
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-08/msg00138.html (8,042 bytes)

163. LF: Re: SM6LKM Jason beacon (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 08:51:21 EDT
Hello Jim, Johan and group, Also tried to copy Johan's beacon with quite little succes. A lot of harmonics from AC mains around 7.000 MHz reducing the RX's sensitivity. IMO, the effect described by J
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-08/msg00140.html (8,379 bytes)

164. LF: Reasons for different soundcard sensitivity (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 13:48:23 EDT
Dear Jim and group, The problem you mentioned (Jason decoding and waterfall sensitivity) may not only be a problem of the soundcard itself. Just a thought: The reason can also be the computer itself:
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-08/msg00168.html (9,043 bytes)

165. Re: LF: DL1? (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2002 11:09:50 EDT
Hello Dave, Quite likely that the DL1 station calling you was DL1EIE, located in JO31. I worked Arnim(?) for the first time around noon in very heavy QRN so I'm not sure about his name, but the call
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-08/msg00183.html (7,999 bytes)

166. LF: Measuring the effective voltage with FFT / SpecLab (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 16:53:51 EDT
Hi Andy and group, bandwidth and plot this out over a few seconds. Not unsurprisingly, none of the PD software available includes this option so I've recorded a few seconds of .WAV file of this downc
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-08/msg00202.html (8,775 bytes)

167. Re: LF: RU6LWZ (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 13:05:36 EDT
Hi Alex and Group, Ed's sigs was very strong (audible well and visible of cose). May be You have lost Ed's call for You? << Well, I don't think Ed did copy my short test transmission in 'regular' CW.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-09/msg00002.html (8,498 bytes)

168. Re: LF: RU6LWZ (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 06:18:51 EDT
Dear Alex and Group, Like all others, I had solid copy on Ed's signal but never tried to call him (he had enough callers with higher ERP than mine from DF0WD). If you saw a signal from DL0WD (not DF0
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-09/msg00009.html (8,159 bytes)

169. Re: LF: Longwave Activity Day Sept. 21/ 22 (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 12:54:53 EDT
Hello Hans, Thanks for the activity. Yes I thought there were QRN / QRM problems, as it took a few attempts. The station DK0WD calling you was in fact DF0WD with myself at the key. You put out a very
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-09/msg00064.html (8,512 bytes)

170. Re: LF: Argo-SpecLab (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 06:15:02 EDT
Hello Uwe, I think one of the differences between Argo and SpecLab is, that SpecLab makes no attempt at all to change the soundcard's mixer settings (you must do that manually) while Argo has a kind
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-09/msg00228.html (8,476 bytes)

171. Re: LF: sound cards...well amybe if..... (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:23:15 EST
Hello Group, If someone knows an easy way to get started in USB programming, I'd like to try interfacing one of those PIC's with fast ADC and USB interface to a PC. (For a dummy like me, who does not
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00014.html (9,844 bytes)

172. Re: LF: IEE Presentation (uploaded) (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:39:35 EST
Hello Andy and group, thanks for sending the IEE Presentation article. To anyone who is interested in the paper: I have posted it on my QSL.NET webpage, including a short copyright note as requested.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00034.html (7,874 bytes)

173. Re: LF: ICOM 706 Mk2 (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 04:47:59 EDT
Hi Walter, Kevin and group; I use an (old) IC706 for longwave and am quite happy with it. There must be something wrong, if the wobble is in the HERTZ region on 136kHz... imagine what would happen if
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00208.html (9,562 bytes)

174. LF: SM1LCA active on 136kHz (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 04:04:35 EDT
Hello Group, Saturday I worked SM1LCA in CW on 136kHz. Operator's name Kjell, Loc. JO97, must be Gotland Isld. He had some QRM but was 549 here (at DF0WD, JO42). Dear OM Kjell, if you are on this ref
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00210.html (7,757 bytes)

175. Re^2: LF: Non-linear signal processing (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 16:51:53 EDT
Dear Jim, Alex, and group, I will play with the mentioned function in the time domain soon. Will let you know when more can be said about it. BTW Alex - I still have the complete "C" sources of my an
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00237.html (8,056 bytes)

176. Re: LF: MB2HFC (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 04:56:26 EDT
Hello David and others at the Convention, Thanks for the QSO with DF0WD on saturday. Your signal was 559, perfectly readable here in JO42 square (you got everything ok David). Compared to your 600W,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00270.html (8,374 bytes)

177. Re: LF: Logging & New SpecLab.... (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 13:56:09 EST
Hi Alan, thanks for the comments and the info. Other members of the group were doing the tougher part when getting their logging stations running - - - if we can measure and log phase accurately enou
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00057.html (8,653 bytes)

178. LF: Argo Tests under Win XP (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 03:40:00 EST
Hi Alberto, I tried your latest release - again a nice piece of art ! No problems when running a single program instance under Win XP (on a 1.7 GHz machine), stable for hours. Then I played a trick t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00091.html (8,102 bytes)

179. Re: LF: Spectrum Lab Question (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 17:08:35 EST
ll shift the oscillator such that the drift is eliminated after the mixer. << Well, it it possible to set the frequency of one of the oscillator function blocks to the peak frequency in a narrow freq
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00136.html (10,375 bytes)

180. LF: RU6LA activities on Friday (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 05:19:35 EST
Dear Ed and group, Thanks for the activity from Machta, and glad to have worked you from DF0WD with 90mW ERP. Sorry for being so close to RU6LA's TX frequency during my QSO with I5TGC. My intention w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00055.html (8,146 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu