To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Aw: LF: SAQ 'extra transmission' in CT |
From: | LZ <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 2 Jul 2014 18:43:25 +0200 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: [email protected] does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
Importance: | normal |
In-reply-to: | <001101cf9605$643c25a0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> |
References: | <001101cf9605$643c25a0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Sensitivity: | Normal |
Hi Jay, You wrote: > July 2, 2014 reception was slightly down from 'normal' and about on par with > the Jun 29 2014 > transmission last weekend. A short .mp3 of the tuneup session with the ID > curiously sent as QAS! Confirmed; supposing an unknown q-code primarily (°?°) Compared to transmissions in the past speed control is worse these days. Laura Sent from my Goldschmidt-Alternator |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: BIA V SA, Roelof Bakker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Off-band info : 70 MHz QRP allocation temporarily available in germany, Graham |
Previous by Thread: | LF: SAQ 'extra transmission' in CT, jrusgrove |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: SAQ 'extra transmission' in CT, jrusgrove |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |