Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x53G5f2k022471 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 18:05:42 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1hXpKR-0004zA-Dw for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 16:56:55 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1hXpKK-0004z1-Em for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 16:56:48 +0100 Received: from mail-wm1-x332.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::332]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hXpKH-0007ME-QK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 16:56:47 +0100 Received: by mail-wm1-x332.google.com with SMTP id s3so4440516wms.2 for ; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 08:56:44 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=tsZa2h9mQ6B/vWsHaoyjjBNYb9EJ8enuR6RBtxfk6To=; b=ZrQ/30UknqmAVEfnPlqZXagYhA9oFH5zueJn2jnv+BHF5yUI4Zy1B9+HwD7AgDph+A +ekMkd/nVJVXZl9BbsKK5jdcziFehPwOkPN9s7G+zH+GoOc4RtDBC2DLqO6KoF0SZP9z Hr/MaQG52iV7Dopmvwp17/e0IvttsuqZoDWrBQ9jkVrGCEOFKBmJfVEABWNmNR8o+Pk2 C5vrMWwVDSJrQLMyxg3EgXPGzJyTVrtODx+YmdNEiZTNwI8qvOr6rcPBnqdbcrnPV+Z8 HbjDE9iiDyUlKfdE9ACPE5pVAS8TFLf9AXOd19extamKlNaEdYEsXAucK4Wq3IR9CrZO StGA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tsZa2h9mQ6B/vWsHaoyjjBNYb9EJ8enuR6RBtxfk6To=; b=isE6IpNgWCCUTl3t0KAapHa013h1Bt6JawgJsOzJKLlLX17tJQC+zBc5gjl/824T1e pLhCZs2WFIQgG6x81w4LYCtTDFzTvihaV2GJhIz1Qpkni1sv7ErOYqZnDKrHphzEIFQu 782Ojqnp1Ap83zCxw60Panb3R4mCTpvwNzjc5wYax9ct5ZY6fJaQA2yAKEkc2CWA+j3H OFxAhPO390onanGaHhmuhZMSmdOLEhC0CwmA5dyU3ez34D3rowamaFBmDKfbcydkcQ9j Qdb3p6/497WyAPIVipCWMC3A3Z94rGQkQIDpb1LwYYyszKbivqFDWys9bsez1xsVIdGy RuyQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVqcHHlm/31WCXBm9xA3rudVGNZ9nc3yXfZ2mluYNMzfPaAB+IS Rnsd6yE6Hts8hMElIiUGvK7O1MnR648= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyK9G+L8q9XZJ2HqONaaiG0zELo/u+svEesU0fJw4rNAHWDAJAvrRQXNX69uzDW5D1fltGqyg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:208c:: with SMTP id g134mr15178444wmg.112.1559577403230; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 08:56:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y2sm469585wrl.4.2019.06.03.08.56.41 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Jun 2019 08:56:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 16:56:40 +0100 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <708133720.20190603165640@gmail.com> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?VIGILANT_Luis_Fern=E1ndez?= In-Reply-To: <6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA5BEB7E18@servigilant.vigilant.local> References: <12210097510.20190602151107@gmail.com> <6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA5BEB7E18@servigilant.vigilant.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello Luis, I am at work but will draft a more detailed post later. The new CD74HCT74E flip flop board shows similar horrible traces, so I think you may well be on to something here! Thank you. My doubt though is [...] Content analysis details: (-0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:332 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain X-Scan-Signature: f64a6c8ea7591cecbecc6db95ffdd328 Subject: Re: LF: Re: HEF 4013 flip flop anomaly Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello Luis, I am at work but will draft a more detailed post later. The new CD74HCT74E flip flop board shows similar horrible traces, so I think you may well be on to something here! Thank you. My doubt though is using an HP signal generator to inject a X2 frequency also shows the same dire waveforms, I would have *THOUGHT* its signal would be pretty clean? My USB scope has an FFT function and the gates and drains don't look good on it, using the U3S (no output stage sig straight from CLK0 pin of the Si5351A) but it's a bit of a toy in that mode. I could use an SA to look at the input and fiddle with a LFP on it I suppose. Thanks again. Sunday, June 2, 2019, 9:38:07 PM, you wrote: > Hi Chris > One of the modifications I have done to the LF PA is related to the input at HEF4013 > I was using the typical 220nF in series and a 12K and 10K resistors to +12V and GND > The exciter is also an U3, but the old one with DDS. Anyway, the > problem was that the input was too > sensible (too high impedance) and any small signal drived the HEF4013. The drain waveforms were > also not nice at all, and not squared. I even found that just > touching the input of the PA with my > finger drived it out at make the mosfets to work in a very unstable and ugly way > So modified the input components to work as low pass filter and provide lower impedance > The 220nF was changed to 47pF and the 10K to GND replaced with a 5K adjustable trimmer > The 12K to 12V is still in use. You will have to use different values for MF to get it working > a 950KHz > I adjusted the trimmer to work with a 270KHz input signal at 8V5 > p-p. Higer frequency signals do not drive > the HEF4013 at all. Now this is a completely different PA. Squared > drain waveforms and absolutely stable > Seems that garbage in = garbage out rule do also apply here ;-) > Have a try and let us know. It is an easy test > 73 de Luis > EA5DOM > ________________________________________ > De: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] en nombre de Chris Wilson [dead.fets@gmail.com] > Enviado: domingo, 2 de junio de 2019 16:11 > Para: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Asunto: LF: HEF 4013 flip flop anomaly > Hi, I thought a separate thread best for this question > U3S exciter for MF, taking the X2 frequency output @ circa 950 kHz > from the Si5351A CLK0 output pin to a level converter using a > SN74AHCT125N buffer between the si5351a and the HEF4013 flip flop,and > we are seeing something we do not understand, maybe someone can > explain? > We have an adjustable voltage regulator off the main 12V supply for the > HEF4013, next to it on my little driver board, and by chance, we found > that as we lower the voltage to the HEF4013 the drain waveforms clean > up, and just before the 4013 shuts down they are relatively good. I'll > link to scope shots. > We have the driver board grounded right by the driver IC ground points > to as near the FET source pins as the layout will allow (10 mm or so, > copper sheet strap) Before we go further we would like to know why > reducing the voltage to the 4013 improves things! We also see the gate > waveforms go negative when the FET's have power to them, without > voltage applied they are perfectly square. You can see this effect in > the screenshots. Gates are lower traces, drains upper. Thanks. > We are building a board using a CD74HCT74E flip flop in the meantime, > we suspect a 4000 series is not the best choice... > http://www.chriswilson.tv/4-point-8v-on-4013-25v-on-drains.png > http://www.chriswilson.tv/6v-on-4013-25v-on-drains.png > -- > Best regards, > Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com