Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x52KFbof018054 for ; Sun, 2 Jun 2019 22:15:38 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1hXWoi-0001iZ-He for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2019 21:10:56 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1hXWoe-0001iQ-6M for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2019 21:10:52 +0100 Received: from out3-22.antispamcloud.com ([185.201.18.22]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hXWoc-00068D-HR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2019 21:10:51 +0100 Received: from [85.60.35.36] (helo=servigilant.vigilant.es) by mx63.antispamcloud.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hXWoX-00077Q-Qe for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2019 22:10:47 +0200 Received: from servigilant.vigilant.local ([fe80::c40d:8140:d722:5448]) by servigilant.vigilant.local ([fe80::c40d:8140:d722:5448%13]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Sun, 2 Jun 2019 22:10:42 +0200 From: =?Windows-1252?Q?VIGILANT_Luis_Fern=E1ndez?= To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Thread-Topic: EbNaut considerations for tomorrow... Thread-Index: AQHVGILh1CHiRmVdOUO3rVR+giePgaaIyuji Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2019 20:10:41 +0000 Message-ID: <6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA5BEB7DAC@servigilant.vigilant.local> References: <6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA31596319@servigilant.vigilant.local>,<5CF283CC.9010701@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: <5CF283CC.9010701@posteo.de> Accept-Language: es-ES, en-US Content-Language: es-ES X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [85.55.48.44] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: 85.60.35.36 X-MailAssure-Domain: vigilant.es X-MailAssure-Username: smtpsolarwinds Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass (login) smtp.auth=smtpsolarwinds@vigilant.es X-MailAssure-Outgoing-Class: unsure X-MailAssure-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.43) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-Filter-ID: Mvzo4OR0dZXEDF/gcnlw0fHWENUdqj+4JDN3TQDP3eCpSDasLI4SayDByyq9LIhVpuwOmWt+afRK 9B/rggrI60TNWdUk1Ol2OGx3IfrIJKywOmJyM1qr8uRnWBrbSAGDJiPq8PmJuu7YOC8gdYyWscQz 4E/a7yDKGr49b/XGOm3nx8yeplRO3sLIqUlSH7OGTvd8bR+AYj6PV+oAsrekEZOIWFXUh+IpRF9t B9BlKGgBHBI4gTdwLPAZxdZObNoPmdySlZou9qHIGOZDEEo7OzOxewfh+AToIgAT6Yh4WSHdDNTY KQDNjcKgNl4pkrK4IGmroeEpB0qOpyVVNLOawviT1dZQ2SOHGMtIoRKPAdJCh4/BoUr51xumqgDv kAOcsbgEGzFtyq1h0L2sI0HSHjg6xXzSQWLXXtGisNX6h+NS9wT7oELqxavbwzdX3Qz/smYfpztw dkx9TF8kMvPG0wdeM0Ie3DuEGYjrS15nAiu3KNYrfUUSInMivnja0wG+jEnj+0/sukBX17j8hn6e iIca+nPOKTKfxsYujFD/DBF6EipRzMVZ5LqwTx7Vvn9SAo2IPUcAB/4mS6z/8qQNkdmzNcz0TStJ noNhJn2xVbLOSsOmgqSxoSa5pX629ZxyH3g/LGRCDdjpSJwJiHwlofoZ7DiMfbbrbhteoOPScTqt JMA/FRvKUWVuwVLt4mXt0imMteHueyicTGHtz+uOZNM+m4WpRRDP6YzwkAPgQJYcYdDoPQaf4dOy 9hsqRtn/cYnyqtwhmVN+jg5T9jCTwP+nq302CgW0cpVmk6t9cdh1kFtpz5WqVNUgMNSqYEZrvbQJ dyTrbRQ4RA8OcG6DlHTi3MRgGkVFYFPFTe6iYsFefQI/gVOrRzal5g9SD04HDNzFACmzgvg4v4p8 uA8Y7RminqBI3nGd34AYLmTpVeFbLPp9n350Mbemie5JWWm/Mwqvvyz63pRF7yCn+1yLJMIooqEq AnWZXn5Fia0naBLPpd4oPBwjO0yTH3dZds07 X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine3.antispamcloud.com X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, VLF Yes, I still run the 8270Hz grabber (see almost last screen) https://ea5dom.ure.es/grabber/index.html But QRM is too high here. I have never been able to detect a signal in that band yet Content analysis details: (0.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [85.60.35.36 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [185.201.18.22 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 8d5e679c4ecb21aeba32cebcefaae7cb Subject: LF: Re: EbNaut considerations for tomorrow... Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA5BEB7DACservigilantvigi_" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --_000_6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA5BEB7DACservigilantvigi_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Stefan, VLF Yes, I still run the 8270Hz grabber (see almost last screen) https://ea5dom= .ure.es/grabber/index.html But QRM is too high here. I have never been able to detect a signal in that= band yet But can see that the vertical antenna for LF transmission performs quite go= od in LF and VLF Opposite to MF, were the noise when it was tuned there was a real hell, so = it was ususable for Rx Would be interesting to check this antenna in 8270Hz. But need to arrange s= ome hardware to use it with the PC soundcard and 1pps >From 6 to 10 UTC the elevators are intensively used here. Fortunately it se= ems that the QRM from the motor variators is not so high at VLF. Let me arrange the Rx side and will be rea= dy for a test 73 de Luis EA5DOM ________________________________ De: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]= en nombre de DK7FC [selberdenken@posteo.de] Enviado: s=E1bado, 1 de junio de 2019 15:55 Para: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Asunto: VLF: EbNaut considerations for tomorrow... Hi Luis, Another question: Are you still running your VLF grabber? And are you inter= ested to try to receive an EbNaut message at 8270 Hz (again)? I have some time here near the TX antenna and like to TX a bit again, on wh= atever ferquency, Trying a first message decode from DL > EA could be chall= enging. Or, if someone else likes to join or suggest something, i'm open for ideas. There is only a small time window where the QRN is low, about 6...10 UTC. B= ut with my new TX-system this is just fine because a transmssion wouldn't t= ake much longer than 2 hours anyway. 73, Stefan Am 30.05.2019 10:52, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fern=E1ndez: Hi LF Apart from cheking that blacksheep is still running ;-) Just a notification to LFMEN I=92m transmitting WSPR-2 during daylight to check conditions as we approac= h summer solstice here About 2,7A RF current normally The PA is still down at home, so switched off at night. But then I can use = the 90m vertical for RX QRM is high but overall is a very good performer. I can report Chris 2E0ILY= with nice signals and also others which unfortunately don=92t transmit during best night hours. This reports can be= seen spotted as EA5DOM/3 There is a permanent 24/7 Rx using MiniWhip with poorer Rx spotting as EA5D= OM/2 As conditions get worse during daylight I will switch to WSPR-15 and hope t= o get somebody reporting there in the forgotten mode 73 de Luis EA5DOM --_000_6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA5BEB7DACservigilantvigi_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Stefan, VLF

Yes, I still run the 8270Hz grabber (see almost last screen) https://ea5dom.ure.es/grab= ber/index.html
But QRM is too high here. I have never been able to detect a signal in= that band yet

But can see that the vertical antenna for LF transmission performs qui= te good in LF and VLF
Opposite to MF, were the noise when it was tuned there was a real hell= , so it was ususable for Rx

Would be interesting to check this antenna in 8270Hz. But need to arra= nge some
hardware to use it with the PC soundcard and 1pps

From 6 to 10 UTC the elevators are intensively used here. Fortunately = it seems that the QRM from the motor
variators is not so high at VLF. Let me arrange the Rx side and will b= e ready for a test

73 de Luis
EA5DOM

De: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [ow= ner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] en nombre de DK7FC [selberdenken@posteo.d= e]
Enviado: s=E1bado, 1 de junio de 2019 15:55
Para: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Asunto: VLF: EbNaut considerations for tomorrow...

Hi Luis,

Another question: Are you still running your VLF grabber? And are you inter= ested to try to receive an EbNaut message at 8270 Hz (again)?
I have some time here near the TX antenna and like to TX a bit again, on wh= atever ferquency, Trying a first message decode from DL > EA could be ch= allenging.

Or, if someone else likes to join or suggest something, i'm open for ideas.=

There is only a small time window where the QRN is low, about 6...10 UTC. B= ut with my new TX-system this is just fine because a transmssion wouldn't t= ake much longer than 2 hours anyway.


73, Stefan



Am 30.05.2019 10:52, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fern=E1ndez:

Hi LF

 

Apart from cheking that blacksh= eep is still running ;-)

 

Just a notification to LFMEN

I=92m transmitting WSPR-2 durin= g daylight to check conditions as we approach summer solstice here

About 2,7A RF current normally<= /span>

 

The PA is still down at home, s= o switched off at night. But then I can use the 90m vertical for RX<= /p>

QRM is high but overall is a ve= ry good performer. I can report Chris 2E0ILY with nice signals and also oth= ers which

unfortunately don=92t transmit = during best night hours. This reports can be seen spotted as EA5DOM/3

There is a permanent 24/7 Rx us= ing MiniWhip with poorer Rx spotting as EA5DOM/2

 

As conditions get worse during = daylight I will switch to WSPR-15 and hope to get somebody reporting there = in

the forgotten mode

 

73 de Luis

EA5DOM

 

 

--_000_6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA5BEB7DACservigilantvigi_--