Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x57EgQKK009603 for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 16:42:27 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1hZFxg-0003K2-QA for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2019 15:35:20 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1hZFv9-0003Jr-Hd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2019 15:32:43 +0100 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hZFv0-0000GG-KK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2019 15:32:37 +0100 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32DCA160060 for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 16:32:33 +0200 (CEST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1559917953; bh=XKzyab6JROSDMrwDnU1GKtZuQdbtOEUHyYdHacp4OPk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=UdVgyy2Q8t6LXg1c/R/Y2ZCnTBkYGaebTKwJ1u0ecw9oLD1VzyKEHLU+CtaiaTZGx B8dtv4VdmWEEsIC/CuN2ZHK/Ozy63O2Elzf4wgi4yHwA42lXMSQqnBFpxQIzaAIMk8 r7s3pHBWIjCDQ5gfmUec+g1YtFbhSWaL22qDUF15QdspEim87+pMkhpzFGfYv2xOPc eHzo3dQJHeg0FfixGjKC2lzG122zGBBqRBul7EJ5JcjlaDusS+WHRK9lD/K4BohwzJ aa325JeS9v8DNTj7dNXgE4j8Dg3yPIHWTuFwL6ECyPgsGjhUBgXNAtdEXXgRChGqK1 cXgK09mqbXmZA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 45L4k843yGz6tm5 for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 16:32:32 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5CFA7580.5070009@posteo.de> Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 16:32:32 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA31596319@servigilant.vigilant.local>,<5CF283CC.9010701@posteo.de> <6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA5BEB7DAC@servigilant.vigilant.local> <5CF57C41.7020008@posteo.de> <6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA5BEB9071@servigilant.vigilant.local>,<5CF75AE7.8080103@posteo.de> <6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA5BEBAD4F@servigilant.vigilant.local>,<5CF907FC.803@posteo.de> <6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA5BEBBACC@servigilant.vigilant.local>,<5CF9695E.8020006@posteo.de> <6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA5BEBBF0B@servigilant.vigilant.local> In-Reply-To: <6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA5BEBBF0B@servigilant.vigilant.local> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Luis, Am 07.06.2019 08:34, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fernández: > > > I have the overnight spectrogram at 1min per pixel. The gap on the > left at about 21h is the test without antenna > > https://www.dropbox.c [...] Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.0 DKIMWL_WL_MED DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted Medium sender X-Scan-Signature: 420019f4991fbaa4f653703c21f48617 Subject: Re: LF: Re: EbNaut considerations for tomorrow... Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030801000006070100040206" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030801000006070100040206 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Luis, Am 07.06.2019 08:34, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fernández: > > > I have the overnight spectrogram at 1min per pixel. The gap on the > left at about 21h is the test without antenna > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/ojhdcjskefomda2/Benidorm%2090m%20vertical%20LF%20tuned%20VLF%2024KHz%201min%20x%20bin.JPG?dl=0 > > The elevators QRM is clearly identified and drops from about 00utc to > 05utc. Best, lower noise from 03 to 05utc Someone came home late at night! :-) > Anyway amazingly quite, considering this is urban enviroment and the > building tower holds 78 neighbours with all kind > of noisy sources at each home. And a couple of 3 phase 380V variators > for the lifts just a few meters under the antenna Hmmmmm, something is still missing. The QRN usually drops below 4 kHz, like seen on the upper image of my grabber http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html Now in summer at daylight, that difference (e.g. 8 kHz vs. 3 kHz) can reach > 20 dB, easily. I still don't see that signal drop on your image, so something is not running optimal. Let's see what happens when you put the transformer on the roof. I think the signal levels will rise at least by 10 dB and hopefully the QRM will not. 73, Stefan PS: Maybe use a relay to switch the coax cable between LF TX and VLF RX? > > 73 de Luis > EA5DOM > --------------030801000006070100040206 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Luis,

Am 07.06.2019 08:34, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fernández:


I have the overnight spectrogram at 1min per pixel. The gap on the left at about 21h is the test without antenna


The elevators QRM is clearly identified and drops from about 00utc to 05utc. Best, lower noise from 03 to 05utc
Someone came home late at night! :-)

Anyway amazingly quite, considering this is urban enviroment and the building tower holds 78 neighbours with all kind
of noisy sources at each home. And a couple of 3 phase 380V variators for the lifts just a few meters under the antenna
Hmmmmm, something is still missing. The QRN usually drops below 4 kHz, like seen on the upper image of my grabber
http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html
Now in summer at daylight, that difference (e.g. 8 kHz vs. 3 kHz) can reach > 20 dB, easily.

I still don't see that signal drop on your image, so something is not running optimal. Let's see what happens when you put the transformer on the roof. I think the signal levels will rise at least by 10 dB and hopefully the QRM will not.

73, Stefan

PS: Maybe use a relay to switch the coax cable between LF TX and VLF RX?


73 de Luis
EA5DOM

--------------030801000006070100040206--