Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x5T6nWrY019107 for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 08:49:33 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1hh6w7-0003xt-R6 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 07:34:12 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1hh6sV-0003xc-W3 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 07:30:28 +0100 Received: from smtp1web.tin.it ([212.216.176.195]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hh6sP-0000us-IC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 07:30:22 +0100 Received: from feu5 (10.192.64.15) by smtp1web.tin.it (8.6.060.43) id 5CCC0DA600B60B2A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 08:30:19 +0200 Received: from (80.180.70.86) by wmlighttin.pc.tim.it; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 08:30:19 +0200 Message-ID: <16ba1ed6c34.marcocadeddu@tin.it> Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 08:30:19 +0200 (CEST) From: "marcocadeddu@tin.it" To: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: 80.180.70.86 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hola Luis, may be that due to the high temp (> 30°C at 8AM local time) my CPU doesn't work fine and I misunderstood some info, but will share my thoughts anyway ;-) I mean you can remote operate the [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.216.176.195 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (marcocadeddu[at]tin.it) X-Scan-Signature: 39d0aa3a8a50eef73e9de70bcfcadb32 Subject: R: Re: LF: LF daylight test close to the north hemisphere solstice Content-Type: text/plain;charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id x5T6nWrY019107 Hola Luis, may be that due to the high temp (> 30°C at 8AM local time) my CPU doesn't work fine and I misunderstood some info, but will share my thoughts anyway ;-) I mean you can remote operate the tape switch with standard car relays (I mean the open frame high current relays for the light or the horn ;- ) ) rated at 10 or 20 DC amperes: they are cheap robust and keeping short wires should work fine. It should be easier to switch taps to ground in the secondary winding (thus antenna side) providing for instance 1:1 1:2 and 1:0,3 ratio. This was the easy part ;-) What I don't understand is what you are measuring.. When you have higher antenna impedance, also the output impedance of the ampli should rise and have about the same DC input power with lower RF current and higher RF voltage. I had to do some antenna work, but really have no will to work on my roof with temp reaching +40 during the day.. prefer to be lazy and do it later at the end of the summer :-D 73, Marco IK1HSS ----Messaggio originale---- Da: luis@vigilant.es Data: 28-giu-2019 22.04 A: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Ogg: Re: LF: LF daylight test close to the north hemisphere solstice Hi Stefan, LF I'm recovering this message were you proposed a 1:1 ferrite transformer to isolate the antenna My problem is that the antenna impedance varies a lot with humidity. This days we have a hot and dry weather about 30% moisture. VNA shows an impedance value of just 30Ohms at resonance Previous week having sea moisture with 80% values, which are normal here over summer, the impedance rised to 100Ohm at resonance. Of course, PA works in a completely different way in both cases. The best antenna impedance is about 70 Ohm, were I can get 3.2A RF current with 15A@33V PA current Higer impedance causes PA current to rise and RF current drops. Mosfets also get much hotter Low antena impedance produces high RF currents but low PA current and so, less power and higer voltages in the LPF which causes arcs. (LPF is also pending resize. Is the only part still remaining from the old Ropex PA) So, I need a matching transformer, but must be variable and remotely selectable. May be selecting taps with a set of relays or any other mechanical selector. What do you propose for that ? How many turns ? I have a pair of the big blue cores you recommended 73 de Luis EA5DOM ________________________________________ De: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep. org] en nombre de DK7FC [selberdenken@posteo.de] Enviado: miércoles, 5 de junio de 2019 8:16 Para: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Asunto: Re: LF: LF daylight test close to the north hemisphere solstice Hi Luis, No, i just mean a second transformer between PA and the other transformer, into the coax line. A simple 1:1 ferrite transformer. Your ground conductors into and arround the building are a part of the antenna, obviously causing a high voltage between that ground and your shack ground. All you can do is reducing the coupling impedance (capacitive) and the electrical field strength. A well dimensioned 1:1 transformer will provide a good decoupling and low losses. The improved decoupling may change the resonance a bit (because your shack earth is less a part of the system taking RF currents), so a retuning is required. Hopefully your shack earth is not the dominant part of the antenna ground :-) The less it is a part of the ground system, the less is the detuning of the antenna when inserting the second transformer. 73, Stefan