Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x4CC6ZX2016631 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 14:06:36 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1hPn5M-0000M6-OL for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 12 May 2019 12:56:09 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1hPn08-0000Ln-Oz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 12 May 2019 12:50:45 +0100 Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42b]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hPn06-0001kP-CN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 12 May 2019 12:50:42 +0100 Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id v11so12194906wru.5 for ; Sun, 12 May 2019 04:50:41 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9NfqEIwh5DRMRDDiVJs38cOJKx3VhD/C3ikJoAO1wsA=; b=J/jc2sep1/2OdbrDxcfqKDnu0lJe1JZD+vgmoy3jLxSmi5xAKe2Cxu8EBCUoWseJPg rBY/KAsPQ/CgyUzE1yLkIn60MsoBYgZQm34dWCd5Mu4DSuYdAFRqKtYFh59NSdbNXSBY gH9ZYW2as3HsEgUsE1rVIgZ5n//qPvdmDSkp8kq4NJTJ4csBeeCi3mi/E+TRTAKT/qBq mFXSmzsVkrBdLIiJymIVguhw9kOzXeR6CqhR7eRRtSxcM059vqrsXi6bWsvICFlRJPUX 8HiP6FsF1yXU9tUTacyKNYwpfRp1U70abzIpttW5bOary+xSzZA2MAbMIwFaJRilO/Pa SzKA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9NfqEIwh5DRMRDDiVJs38cOJKx3VhD/C3ikJoAO1wsA=; b=A1j0lEHtaw+Y9VQPt6SbMlu9SVHOpDCTou/K4INIULP+GSZkEd1AnYXK2wTYd9BXa+ Y5i6MOPUZDKgCRNydImVz3Eni23cLKCPqeHujHb5zVLjCf3+fbEryqBMR38ortAseY41 gnBK1YFupQb4Cjvvt6F6N/GvR4mWaUI8xrOkWNf9JE8Y5vFVfTb0K56778DDeCfAD+05 ktvR9CmAMuvpaHGqO0dBOL2ViwQxzyie7js9R4XgT1UeGu9puOhEqPJAfMiofomXDWwj flDmb0TZFYBrvPhHVC/F/HeYKV05JzsFtewT8a5yk2TiqF5agNeVrTlDRKKfbSEnVjHQ XRNw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXzDKkx3IlhMk6ZgsA4nYoNPxT21vmIA0ox7F1DMbtcjuc0licB ij6fox1e/V2738R71y+qTeA/hpPiz1A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxWy/Ji5VsnFDj4rm2HkXL9ioigEyrKR5hpKVVZRdP4dQkmDz6acMRBZYHrnwQzLFVp/4pOtA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:9bd2:: with SMTP id e18mr2316634wrc.210.1557661841164; Sun, 12 May 2019 04:50:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g185sm7668236wmf.30.2019.05.12.04.50.39 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 12 May 2019 04:50:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 12:50:38 +0100 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <475810047.20190512125038@gmail.com> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Re: MF amp In-Reply-To: <1UTJHp87NM.2LemuKEGHv@optiplex980-pc> References: <336545566.20190511184405@gmail.com> <1UTJHp87NM.2LemuKEGHv@optiplex980-pc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello Jay, understood re short probe ground and cap values, thanks. BTW, mail direct to you is still being replied to via Blacksheep! So something is amiss with your mail filtering perhaps? Thanks aga [...] Content analysis details: (-0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:42b listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain X-Scan-Signature: c9d6a1e47761f7ec7375ac340bef30d0 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SA Timed out after 180 secs Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello Jay, understood re short probe ground and cap values, thanks. BTW, mail direct to you is still being replied to via Blacksheep! So something is amiss with your mail filtering perhaps? Thanks again, have a good weekend. Sunday, May 12, 2019, 12:16:52 PM, you wrote: > Chris > Sorry for slow reply ... been having intermittant e mail problems. > The value is not critical. What is required is a good ground at > that point. Whatever combination of capacitors works best is what > you want to go with. No doubt this will vary from layout to layout > and capacitor type to capacitor type. Use a scope to monitor voltage > across the capacitors. Don't use the scope probe ground lead or hook > clip as this will not give an accurate reading of what's going on. > Instead, remove the hook clip assembly and fashion a piece of #14 > bare copper wire with several turns and a pigtail. The turns should > be sized to fit tightly over the scope probe ground sleeve. The > short pigtail can be temporarily soldered to the circuit board such > that the 1/4" scope tip comes in contact with the capacitor. The > idea is to keep the scope leads as short as possible. > Jay > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Chris Wilson > Reply-To: > To: > Sent: 5/11/2019 1:44:05 PM > Subject: MF amp > ________________________________________________________________________________ > Hi Jay, > Sorry to be a pain, nearly finished the 1kW MF amp of your design, > please clarify if the center tap transformer to ground cap stack needs > to be exactly 0.56 uF, or if it's a typo and needs to be only 0.5 uF, > what's confusing me is where it states stacking just 0.1 uF MLC > chips... Thanks :) > -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com