Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x39KCp05012493 for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 22:12:58 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1hDx0w-0006qQ-Cq for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 21:06:38 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1hDx0B-0006qH-25 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 21:05:51 +0100 Received: from lethe.lipkowski.org ([151.80.54.59] helo=lipkowski.org) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hDx07-0005XI-6k for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 21:05:47 +0100 Received: from mailn.lipkowski.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x39K28tB011835 for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 22:02:09 +0200 Received: from localhost (sq5bpf@localhost) by mailn.lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id x39K27Im011831 for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 22:02:07 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: mailn.lipkowski.org: sq5bpf owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 22:02:07 +0200 (CEST) From: Jacek Lipkowski To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <5CABBF99.6010502@posteo.de> Message-ID: References: <1652663722.1033558.1554575549616.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1652663722.1033558.1554575549616@mail.yahoo.com> <5CA90E98.2070707@posteo.de> <8c46744b-f60a-ca91-f60f-97a2f5f7b11f@abelian.org> <5CA931D4.6050908@posteo.de> <83eece37-ae11-b2fd-917c-ad29c350695b@abelian.org> <5CA9BD98.2030002@posteo.de> <5CAA1D1D.8070204@posteo.de> <5CABBF99.6010502@posteo.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score-sq5bpf: -2.9 () ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 on 10.1.3.10 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Mon, 8 Apr 2019, DK7FC wrote: > Did you use your large computer at work to try to get the best result? no, unfortunately i had to give it back. but i did a simple search over a small set of parameters (a few hundred -a , -t and -d combinations, and some tests with different filtering). Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: e4383209d2ccb9552700d53c0b540538 Subject: Re: ULF: EbNaut message transmitted from ground loop Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false On Mon, 8 Apr 2019, DK7FC wrote: > Did you use your large computer at work to try to get the best result? no, unfortunately i had to give it back. but i did a simple search over a small set of parameters (a few hundred -a , -t and -d combinations, and some tests with different filtering). jacek