Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x3C7hOEp029830 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 09:43:32 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1hEqZI-0003vu-J8 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 08:25:48 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1hEqYu-0003vl-J5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 08:25:24 +0100 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hEqYs-0001Yk-Un for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 08:25:23 +0100 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E07BF16005D for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 09:25:19 +0200 (CEST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1555053919; bh=HqUksCy4tU3/9NplQb+gjvfeEhh6nzaoXRxTYSoDpDU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=DgMN2bfEa5uAZfctK2LBaOV9LjrckBS0HKhI3aB22qyp7umbstBYjU5k9qtlTMU0X heFJLKXs+Q39O3yQgGwJfxLc0sK8MEwqN3HxZyv6+kjKbFgM3HhrD5ldBOvEi8f6YA 8onVr832QWKOabrlxsj5O2WbyJKDrxK450WLEB4Jg+h/6f9DUgufQm3X1GMPTdPiZY uGIUAnxoxo25Ui76E+nai4i4l2sC3hPruy9vcmk4A0NnpKjjjaUPmbzVQO6es8mjp5 u4/5zvmusaORbjnHJ94DvasltQ63+FbO8TFjtnsn4LHbzUv82rpPI5eM/Sfy+6MMdl QVEHPONZ6Bhig== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 44gTv04xrJz6tmN for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 09:25:16 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5CB03D5C.9080906@posteo.de> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 09:25:16 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1652663722.1033558.1554575549616.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1652663722.1033558.1554575549616@mail.yahoo.com> <5CA90E98.2070707@posteo.de> <8c46744b-f60a-ca91-f60f-97a2f5f7b11f@abelian.org> <5CA931D4.6050908@posteo.de> <83eece37-ae11-b2fd-917c-ad29c350695b@abelian.org> <5CA9BD98.2030002@posteo.de> <5CAA1D1D.8070204@posteo.de> <5CABBF99.6010502@posteo.de> <5CAD944C.7050006@posteo.de> <5CAFA72A.10602@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: <5CAFA72A.10602@posteo.de> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Jacek, For future tests it would be useful to have a grabber window on your side, showing 1...3 kHz in one spectrogram. It would be just to see how and when the QRN/M starts and when it has its minimum at ni [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: fc152e7304849b9a177649b85aea9f41 Subject: Re: ULF: EbNaut message transmitted from ground loop Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Jacek, For future tests it would be useful to have a grabber window on your side, showing 1...3 kHz in one spectrogram. It would be just to see how and when the QRN/M starts and when it has its minimum at night. Can you set up something like that? And what about Marcin? Maybe you can build up a RX site at his QTH. Close to the sea, it may be a bit quieter than in the city(?). And if he has a garden, there may be a place with a clean ground... 73, Stefan Am 11.04.2019 22:44, schrieb DK7FC: > Hi Jacek, ULF, > > That's great! Amazing! 976 km distance in the ULF range! > A decode at 15.63 dB carrier S/N. > Can you describe your RX antenna and location/position of it? > > Thank you for your work! I will try to use your parameters and then > we see the digital loss of the vorbis path. > It is a good set of data to 'play' with, because this > distance/frequency/mode has never been done by radio amateurs before. > A first detection/decode DL > SP. > > Eventually i'll do more experiments this weekend. Let's hope for a > suitable wx. The last days have not been really quiet ;-) > > And BTW, when is your next transmission together with Marcin? > > Another thing: Sometimes i git better results when using vtfilter -h > lp... -h hp... instead of vtfilter -h bp... because the edges are a > bit smoother. Also it can improve the SNR to place the center > frequency of the filter not to the TX frequ ency but some 100 Hz up or > down, depending on the noise distribution. > > 73, Stefan > > PS: I remember you asked a few times if i can go lower than 5170 Hz. > Now we are there :-) > >