Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x3BKovOc026571 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 22:50:58 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1hEgZf-0003Bq-Rv for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 21:45:31 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1hEgYk-0003BR-RH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 21:44:34 +0100 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hEgYg-0000zx-NS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 21:44:31 +0100 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D1F0160061 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 22:44:28 +0200 (CEST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1555015468; bh=6axwyr6VEIRyfnxWb6/YBQYLub5i0TlfJfcOiMLrsK8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=RhJVb17dBgbpbfSDIUcRFPefoOONzC5pHYO1kWe1ixVB5XjxOBBaLRh6OVH8Qnmve gV+4JVt1hLs+VPD6V3WSnUTi5/b4g+SCRCmh8m08LYWeYM8BfKGVwZyAbQ07mxi/Nk uEuiaeCZ8ROp0B0k1WF2tjRXdj1UuRVTSxYB4qKsYo0hStQW0a7XcvAeuP1w/B3+6r 8MZw7Z5O0Us+NAHLU7oRYJD+ZVyYuP2AoNIki2s4xTLEvVps6TUj0olhqXj3OC5IuH SiI8ATJQ8ChjYNbaqN+T2OZzHpKqmAH8NniGw02iSV6tT9t5bXCJI+4v9qVorK4AHu 0or76I1dXR9vQ== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 44gCgb3Xdtz6tmF for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 22:44:27 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5CAFA72A.10602@posteo.de> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 22:44:26 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1652663722.1033558.1554575549616.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1652663722.1033558.1554575549616@mail.yahoo.com> <5CA90E98.2070707@posteo.de> <8c46744b-f60a-ca91-f60f-97a2f5f7b11f@abelian.org> <5CA931D4.6050908@posteo.de> <83eece37-ae11-b2fd-917c-ad29c350695b@abelian.org> <5CA9BD98.2030002@posteo.de> <5CAA1D1D.8070204@posteo.de> <5CABBF99.6010502@posteo.de> <5CAD944C.7050006@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Jacek, ULF, That's great! Amazing! 976 km distance in the ULF range! A decode at 15.63 dB carrier S/N. Can you describe your RX antenna and location/position of it? Thank you for your work! I will try to use your parameters and then we see the digital loss of the vorbis path. It is a good set of data to 'play' with, because this distance/frequency/mode has never [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: 4d97240a623a26620214cd27feaa9f71 Subject: Re: ULF: EbNaut message transmitted from ground loop Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Jacek, ULF, That's great! Amazing! 976 km distance in the ULF range! A decode at 15.63 dB carrier S/N. Can you describe your RX antenna and location/position of it? Thank you for your work! I will try to use your parameters and then we see the digital loss of the vorbis path. It is a good set of data to 'play' with, because this distance/frequency/mode has never been done by radio amateurs before. A first detection/decode DL > SP. Eventually i'll do more experiments this weekend. Let's hope for a suitable wx. The last days have not been really quiet ;-) And BTW, when is your next transmission together with Marcin? Another thing: Sometimes i git better results when using vtfilter -h lp... -h hp... instead of vtfilter -h bp... because the edges are a bit smoother. Also it can improve the SNR to place the center frequency of the filter not to the TX frequ ency but some 100 Hz up or down, depending on the noise distribution. 73, Stefan PS: I remember you asked a few times if i can go lower than 5170 Hz. Now we are there :-) Am 11.04.2019 21:39, schrieb Jacek Lipkowski: > Stefan, > > I've tried to bruteforce the right filtering and noise blanking > parameters. So after a few thousand tries i get: > > sq5bpf@jitter:/stuff2/sq5bpf/vlf_stefan2$ vtcat -p < stefan_2970_1 | > vtfilter -a th=4 -h bp,f=2970,w=2200 > pliktmp6 > > sq5bpf@jitter:/stuff2/sq5bpf/vlf_stefan2$ vtblank -v -d0.0007 -a20 -t > 50 < pliktmp6 | vtmult -f 2970.1 | vtresample -r 240 | vtresample > -r 10 |vtraw -oa | ebnaut -dp16K21A -r10 -c2 -v -k16 -S6 -N7 -PS -L > 50000 > > vtblank: selected channel: 1 = -:1 > vtblank: channels: 1, sample_rate: 48000 > vtblank: hfactor: 0.000e+00 > vtblank: afactor: 20.000 > initial reference phase -89.4 amplitude 7.496e-04 > phase 0 0 0 0 0 > vtblank: end of input > vtblank: dropsum 0 64750004, nfp 359999999 > vtblank: dropfactor 0 1.799e-01 > found rank 14143 ber 4.2548e-01 Eb/N0 -2.5 M -2.143712342e-02 ph 0 > 0,0,0,0 [DK7FC/P] > carrier phase: -10.6 deg > carrier Eb/N0: -0.4 dB > carrier Es/N0: -15.33 dB > carrier S/N: 15.63 dB in 133.5 uHz, -23.11 dB in 1Hz, -57.09 dB in 2.5kHz > elapsed 92 > > > > Hope you like it :) > 7 chracters at 976km on ULF 2970.1Hz :) > > Article about it here: > > https://klubnl.pl/wpr/en/index.php/2019/04/11/ulf-2970hz-record/ > > BTW i will keep bruteforcing the rx parameters, maybe i will come up > with a setting that gives even more S/N. This might be useful for your > next tests. > > > VY 73 > > Jacek / SQ5BPF > > >