Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x24Ihx5W022027 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 19:44:05 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1h0sLc-0008Cu-A4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 18:29:56 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1h0sKq-0008Cl-1M for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 18:29:08 +0000 Received: from lethe.lipkowski.org ([151.80.54.59] helo=lipkowski.org) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1h0sKn-0000Or-4l for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 18:29:06 +0000 Received: from mailn.lipkowski.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x24IREOo003927 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 19:27:15 +0100 Received: from localhost (sq5bpf@localhost) by mailn.lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id x24IREKT003923 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 19:27:14 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: mailn.lipkowski.org: sq5bpf owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 19:27:14 +0100 (CET) From: Jacek Lipkowski To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <5C7CEF81.5080302@posteo.de> Message-ID: References: <5C7AD93E.8010402@posteo.de> <5C7CEF81.5080302@posteo.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score-sq5bpf: -2.9 () ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 on 10.1.3.10 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan, thanks for the congratulations! We will be doing further experiments. This one was done in haste, and could have been planned better, so for sure there is room for a lot of improvement. We (Marcin SQ2BXI and i) always try to do these experiments together, since it seems there aren't more VLF enthusiasts in Poland. Unfortunately this requires one of us to drive 350km to the other, and [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: 7c7a1907d3a7d57b28660e5fb4c32107 Subject: Re: VLF: ebnaut transmission from Poland Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Stefan, thanks for the congratulations! We will be doing further experiments. This one was done in haste, and could have been planned better, so for sure there is room for a lot of improvement. We (Marcin SQ2BXI and i) always try to do these experiments together, since it seems there aren't more VLF enthusiasts in Poland. Unfortunately this requires one of us to drive 350km to the other, and this is the reason why we don't do them more often. We are planning a longer ebnaut transmission, and we hope to draw a line on your grabber this time :) VY 73 Jacek / SQ5BPF On Mon, 4 Mar 2019, DK7FC wrote: > Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2019 10:27:29 +0100 > From: DK7FC > Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: VLF: ebnaut transmission from Poland > > Hi Jacek, Marcin, > > Well done! Congratulations to a first VLF signal coming from SP that is > detected over such a distance, more than 1000 km! This is truely encouraging > and shows what could be done by MANY amateurs, if they would just give it a > try! > A milestone for your country, from an amateur radio view. > > Thanks for the details in that website. It is interesting to see that such > ground loop antennas seem to work even in regions where the ground > conductivity is expected to be quite high. Thanks to Paul's decode, you now > have the certainty that the signal actually propagates. > Well, the ground loop seems to radiate into Paul's direction and there is a > lot of water on your path (between you and Paul). Also we (DL0AO and DK7FC) > are closer to QRN sources in south-east Europe. This will contibute to our > negative decode result here. > On the other side we saw that the signal also propagates into unexpected > directions, at least as long as the QRB is lower than 2000 km. > > It would be most welcome to see more activity from your side! And it looks > like you can rise the ERP by 10 dB without much effort. Are you planning more > experiments? And when? :-) > The EbNaut message was transmitted during a time where phase changes are > likely, because it was during the sunrise at your location. Maybe you can > repeat the experiment, using 2 characters transmitted over 6 hours, starting > 21 UTC for example? That would help us, here in the south, to receive your > message. > I will have a look at my signal recording to see the SNR for the message 'SP' > later. > > At 75W and 300V antenna voltage you had 250 mA antenna current and, as you > wrote, 1200 Ohm. If you have 500 Ohm DC resistance then i conclude that you > did not series resonate the antenna. The reactive component was j1090 Ohm, so > a series C of 177 nF (100+47+22 nF) would help to reduce the feed point > impedance to 500 Ohm. Not sure if you could then run a higher power but at > least the PA losses would be a bit lower. > > With some cheap 0.75mm2 CCA loudspeaker cable you could reduce the wire > losses by about 90%. > > All this is very nice promising! > > Good luck and i hope to get a new chance to receive you here soon. > > 73, Stefan > > > > > > Am 03.03.2019 19:44, schrieb Jacek Lipkowski: >> On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, DK7FC wrote: >> >>> I've tried a lot of antenna mixing but did not get better spectrum peaks >>> that 10.5 dB SNR, so it is quite weak. Best decoder result was 'AV' at >>> rank 70. >> >> The transmitted message was: SP >> >>> I'm waiting for your detailed description of the experiment. What antenna >>> and power was used? How did you generate signal? >> >> A preliminary descritpion is here: >> >> https://klubnl.pl/wpr/en/index.php/2019/03/03/nadawcze-proby-z-dipolem-ziemnym-w-zakresie-vlf/ >> >> >> Around 100W into a 500m long earth dipole, the signal was weak and we were >> surprised to have Paul receive it (well, maybe not that surprised given >> Paul's excellent receiver). >> >> >> For the 8270.005Hz carrier we used a GPS generator module (i think it might >> be just an uBlox GPS inside, but didn't investigate it). I think Marcin >> bought it on some auction site. >> >> For 8270.00073Hz we used an old Neoware terminal with an uBlox neo-7M GPS >> installed inside. The gps is used to provide a coarse time reference (not >> the best precision because the 1PPS signal is not used), and as a 20kHz >> reference signal connected to the terminal sound card. The terminal runs a >> slightly modified version of Paul's ebsynth, and some custom-written >> software to control the gps. This is the same generator that i've used in >> my other tests. I can publish some details in case anyone is interested. >> >> VY 73 >> >> Jacek / SQ5BPF >> >> >