Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x2ICWFnJ025822 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 13:32:23 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1h5rLE-0000uE-Ux for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 12:26:08 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1h5rKn-0000u5-Lz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 12:25:41 +0000 Received: from viper.bpweb.net ([83.223.106.10]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1h5rKk-00018z-J0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 12:25:39 +0000 X-BpAuth: neil-g4dbn-uk Received: from [10.50.254.3] (neilsmith22.plus.com [81.174.129.86]) (authenticated bits=0) by viper.bpweb.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x2ICPKRb017820 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 12:25:37 GMT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5C8F5094.5060206@posteo.de> <2cdc034b-1665-5239-c2de-64e5bf2b8fe3@abelian.org> <93284405-A3C4-426E-8789-8EF1099D2262@g4dbn.uk> <2683b97c-65c8-951b-bcb2-7c309c0e7e31@abelian.org> From: Neil Message-ID: <0a772477-ce23-0a30-9715-be372654d3a0@g4dbn.uk> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 12:25:15 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2683b97c-65c8-951b-bcb2-7c309c0e7e31@abelian.org> Content-Language: en-GB X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 190318-0, 18/03/2019), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-BpTo: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Is there a mirrored archive or backups of the blacksheep server to preserve it and keep it active when the server is no longer alive? Are the admins of the group still around? I'm not a fan of groups.io by any means, but the monetisation model seems to work for them, with free non-commercial groups acting as a way to market the commercial service to the businesses that have [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [83.223.106.10 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 5f132ffce194fb93f2267a462d849f2b Subject: Re: LF: reflector archive history... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Is there a mirrored archive or backups of the blacksheep server to preserve it and keep it active when the server is no longer alive? Are the admins of the group still around? I'm not a fan of groups.io by any means, but the monetisation model seems to work for them, with free non-commercial groups acting as a way to market the commercial service to the businesses that have free group users on the payroll to act as unpaid influencers. I can imagine there would be consent issues with a closed non-indexed group being ported to an open one. There is a similar issue with the French SHF forums.  There are two running in parallel and most users are cross-posting duplicates every time in hyperfr and hyper-fr-ref. Archival storage of old forums and websites is more and more important as we lose some of the folks who created the first generation of ham radio sites.  We can't just put our trust in the Internet Archive. Neil G4DBN On 18/03/2019 10:37, Paul Nicholson wrote: > > > groups.io forums like UKMicrowaves have public archives > > which are indexed by search engines. > > Unfortunately the groups.io settings would have been inherited > from the Yahoo group as part of the migration process.  The Yahoo > group was set up as a private group (as befits a family or commercial > discussion group), so the archives and files were never public. > > I doubt that it is possible to retrospectively change that because > that would expose posts made when the group was private. > > Agreed, in every respect groups.io is an improvement on > Yahoo and on traditional mailing lists like this one. > > Eventually the blacksheep computer will fail - it's have been running > on borrowed time for years now!  We have been very lucky with it. > > A solution would be to create a new group on groups.io with public > archives and files.  groups.io itself might last 10 years or so, but > the public archives will last indefinitely as a resource for > historians. > > -- > Paul Nicholson > -- >