Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x1OL6WoV019025 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 22:06:34 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gy0u0-0008P5-1A for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 21:01:36 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gy0tY-0008Ow-MY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 21:01:08 +0000 Received: from 576e.8172.0000.0000.0210.4001.0d0f.7062.ip6.static.sl-reverse.com ([2607:f0d0:1004:120::2718:e675] helo=mx1.lylix.net) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gy0tW-000482-76 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 21:01:06 +0000 Received: from no3m.local (dynamic-acs-24-144-206-160.zoominternet.net [24.144.206.160]) (Authenticated sender: eric@lylix.net) by mx1.lylix.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF8271A408BE for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 16:00:59 -0500 (EST) To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <043bec62-8144-5ff3-98a6-9f04699f6a4c@no3m.net> <1551011916482.41235@kuleuven.be> <1551014480338.17397@kuleuven.be>

<27248150-3565-aeb8-9b66-53a9089fd4ab@n1bug.com> <1551018171015.45843@kuleuven.be> <81de6f2c-30cf-5142-fbd8-bd67416e97d7@no3m.net> <1UTEDXzFHD.CcaJifW3lFj@optiplex980-pc> From: Eric NO3M Message-ID: Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2019 16:00:58 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1UTEDXzFHD.CcaJifW3lFj@optiplex980-pc> Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Jay Just one FET (59N25) on each side. On 2/24/19 3:26 PM, jrusgrove@comcast.net wrote: > Eric > One or two FETs per phase? > Jay W1VD Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 2.0 KHOP_DYNAMIC Relay looks like a dynamic address X-Scan-Signature: 49f0f587e44d6711c57b8a4e950ba850 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Class D current spikes Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------3A4816ADDB83626A8DA836FE" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------3A4816ADDB83626A8DA836FE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Jay Just one FET (59N25) on each side. On 2/24/19 3:26 PM, jrusgrove@comcast.net wrote: > Eric > One or two FETs per phase? > Jay W1VD --------------3A4816ADDB83626A8DA836FE Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Jay

Just one FET (59N25) on each side.

On 2/24/19 3:26 PM, jrusgrove@comcast.net wrote:

Eric

One or two FETs per phase?

Jay W1VD

--------------3A4816ADDB83626A8DA836FE--