Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x1EHr60n029595 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 18:53:07 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1guL8J-0004Q3-NC for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 17:49:11 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1guL8I-0004Pu-Ty for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 17:49:10 +0000 Received: from vmailpx1.mvnet.de ([194.25.108.49]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1guL8H-0003bV-6I for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 17:49:09 +0000 Received: from [192.168.178.35] (p548DA94C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.169.76]) (authenticated bits=0) by vmailpx1.mvnet.de (/) with ESMTPSA id x1EHn2QW026977 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 18:49:06 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5C656A8F.70702@gmx.de> From: eberhardvwedelstaedt Message-ID: Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 18:49:01 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5C656A8F.70702@gmx.de> Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hallo Steffi http://dl3zid.darc.de/grabber/qrm.html nicht wirklich heftig, oberhalb 1MHz  nichts mehr Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [194.25.108.49 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 8ef270cc2ec30cd34b6313d7ada17a45 Subject: Re: LF: Question: QRM from induction cookers? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------E727BC6D7A8E6D5D810C36FC" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------E727BC6D7A8E6D5D810C36FC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hallo Steffi http://dl3zid.darc.de/grabber/qrm.html nicht wirklich heftig, oberhalb 1MHz  nichts mehr 73   de Eberhard   DL3ZID ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Am 14.02.19 um 14:18 schrieb Steffi: > Hi LF Group, > > soon I will have to buy a new kitchen and I wonder, if an induction > cooker is the right choice (regarding QRM!). Does anyone have experience > with QRM on MF, LF, VLF produced by an induction cooker? Which brands > can be recommended? > > I already heard, that there won't be problems on 80m, but what about > lower frequencies? > > I'm not yet QRV on MF/LF, but maybe in the future.. > > Any comments and experiences will be helpful! > > 73, > de Steffi - dl8nsb > > > --------------E727BC6D7A8E6D5D810C36FC Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hallo Steffi

http://dl3zid.darc.de/grabber/qrm.html

nicht wirklich heftig, oberhalb 1MHz  nichts mehr

73   de Eberhard   DL3ZID



Am 14.02.19 um 14:18 schrieb Steffi:
Hi LF Group,

soon I will have to buy a new kitchen and I wonder, if an induction
cooker is the right choice (regarding QRM!). Does anyone have experience
with QRM on MF, LF, VLF produced by an induction cooker? Which brands
can be recommended?

I already heard, that there won't be problems on 80m, but what about
lower frequencies?

I'm not yet QRV on MF/LF, but maybe in the future..

Any comments and experiences will be helpful!

73,
de Steffi - dl8nsb



--------------E727BC6D7A8E6D5D810C36FC--