Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x1PMIsgi026639 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:18:55 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gyOUh-00056h-2w for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 22:13:03 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gyOSP-000547-2O for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 22:10:41 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gyOSJ-00073F-0M for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 22:10:35 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BEBA16005E for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:10:33 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1551132633; bh=ajN5HAv0cwdKFXg8g5eM/jJdxAMKU8rhmrOWZYwfqPk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=LTIZK7Z0YFtCmJwh7j4I2CJdtzc+VXxfBiYsG1C874+r4atkzLLytoqwHKr6f+cTC SL8XVc34Ij5xPD7pEL80cn8bNnSYQUI/iyPfPkVIGJXjlxtZGhZrZ5F7d1R72dSIHo YgyfY5rHwi7o6YJcSeakZCpvq5dDCPurnbDfTpyAiMm8LqNOwPfDu37LfxH6myAMYK DiHpYhcXpEYBzN1+l/EKu3qu/BnOOAaXQX35i4R0vywtITVXyBX2+N36SrD4V8kgsL C45DDjdJ1iw64tFz6IaDgjtUiEbmfNB8N6yJDuQZLfgQbkeqYzt8+EA+DPju8qgZXD +0jbBx0SXWD7A== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 447bjh4zV3z6tmD for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:10:32 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5C7467D8.2080304@posteo.de> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:10:32 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <752184680.4363593.1551025143826.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <752184680.4363593.1551025143826@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Riccardo, Thank you for the transmission in daylight. It was interesting to compare the different antennas. I analysed just two hours centered at 12 UTC and looked on all 3 antennas separately. Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: f7f918e40888a44a70dddae14bd6a529 Subject: Re: VLF: 8269.997 Hz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090408080009050101090409" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090408080009050101090409 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Riccardo, Thank you for the transmission in daylight. It was interesting to compare the different antennas. I analysed just two hours centered at 12 UTC and looked on all 3 antennas separately. E field: 15.16 dB SNR (in 138.9 uHz) NE loop: 17.61 dB NW loop: -0.2 dB mixing both H field antennas: NE+0.2*NW: 18.58 dB Adding the E field: NE+0.2*NW+0.4*E(rotated by -30 deg): *19.10 dB in 138.9 uHz* Then, 4 hours centered at 12 UTC gives *22.09 dB in 69.4 uHz*. And 8 hours centered at 12 UTC gives *24.99 dB in 34.7 uHz* Between 8 and 16 UTC you could have transferred a 50 character EbNaut message over to my RX! 73, Stefan Am 25.02.2019 14:10, schrieb Riccardo Zoli: > > Markus, VLF > > Yes, indeed: with DL0AO and Stefan's RDF there are no doubt :-) > Yesterday the carrier was produced feeding my antenna with about 650mA > but I think the noise was too high to attempt an EbNaut transmission. > > > All the best > > 73 de Riccardo IW4DXW > > > > Il giorno Dom 24 Feb 2019, 17:21 Markus Vester > ha scritto: > > Looks like Riccardo is sending a carrier on 8269.997 today. > > Good luck, > Markus > --------------090408080009050101090409 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello Riccardo,

Thank you for the transmission in daylight. It was interesting to compare the different antennas. I analysed just two hours centered at 12 UTC and looked on all 3 antennas separately.

E field: 15.16 dB SNR (in 138.9 uHz)
NE loop: 17.61 dB
NW loop:  -0.2 dB

mixing both H field antennas:
NE+0.2*NW: 18.58 dB

Adding the E field:
NE+0.2*NW+0.4*E(rotated by -30 deg): 19.10 dB in 138.9 uHz

Then, 4 hours centered at 12 UTC gives 22.09 dB in 69.4 uHz.
And 8 hours centered at 12 UTC gives 24.99 dB in 34.7 uHz

Between 8 and 16 UTC you could have transferred a 50 character EbNaut message over to my RX!

73, Stefan



Am 25.02.2019 14:10, schrieb Riccardo Zoli:

Markus, VLF

Yes, indeed: with DL0AO and Stefan's RDF there are no doubt :-)
Yesterday the carrier was produced feeding my antenna with about 650mA but I think the noise was too high to attempt an EbNaut transmission.


All the best

73 de Riccardo IW4DXW



Il giorno Dom 24 Feb 2019, 17:21 Markus Vester <markusvester@aol.com> ha scritto:
Looks like Riccardo is sending a carrier on 8269.997 today.

Good luck,
Markus
--------------090408080009050101090409--