Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x1E8dfYx026618 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:39:42 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1guCSF-0002Ct-JQ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 08:33:11 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1guCSE-0002Ck-Mm for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 08:33:10 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1guCSC-0002Ig-CB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 08:33:09 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 707552400FB for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:33:05 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1550133185; bh=X63UeyYh+fuHzfyJkry5CxY9xX95QkxrSzYqDJC4p7E=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=C4dgPhtklclisvfQAZSckxfm5/jBgWmK1ZpRYRD63LST1y126n1aLbeqcQwhnMXj+ xAKd7MorVB2WobwiDGp6XwyB6a2P9yxhu7eRouajqnaQ1hJIEdUaMmH1XE/yf9hHj6 O+Cb3o7HZPFHVHeUF2lyI+X2AvtKdWneGowNDn62zTldl9ldd0fIi3PvwV4GTLXxum YChLXcQJJj4O7WBbek0TO+1u98skN00tJnGL2zQ5MjvzaF4gMcGKL46O/VWFJMpCrH RzKvQYFTCmuwYVl/AlrisuRWP3iFID6heZD0n/m0h+pR+M2KxnlOMAAnzKKHpLTkrg 2C0vkkXz6WBMg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 440V5X6MYfz9rxD for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:33:04 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5C6527C0.3000703@posteo.de> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:33:04 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <168d6970d7b.marcocadeddu@tin.it> <5C5FF6F8.7000007@posteo.de> <5C617D7A.8040105@posteo.de> <5C631503.1040403@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Dimitris, Am 13.02.2019 00:35, schrieb Dimitrios Tsifakis: > > Sadly there are no koalas here, they used to be here but not anymore. > Also sadly, Australian trees are not very good for climbing, they are > gen [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.66 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: 4d97240a623a26620214cd27feaa9f71 Subject: Re: R: Re: VLF: in VK? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Dimitris, Am 13.02.2019 00:35, schrieb Dimitrios Tsifakis: > > Sadly there are no koalas here, they used to be here but not anymore. > Also sadly, Australian trees are not very good for climbing, they are > generally rather brittle. Not a problem though, I have developed other > techniques to get wires up! > The voltages for such ground loop antennas are rather small, another advantage over the usual E field TX antennas. You will stay below 500 V, of course depending on the pwoer and loss resistance you will get. > These are dams, people use the water in them for irrigation. The most > common crop here is grapes for making wine. > Ideal, just perfect. I wonder why you are the first one in Australia doing such experiments. I would...., ah you know... > Hmm, my understanding is that a DC measurement won't be too useful as > it will suffer from polarisation problems. When you do a DC > measurement, try to reverse the polarity and let me know what happens > to the resistance you are measuring compared to the previous polarity. > I know about the effect of an extra voltage drop on the surface of an electrode into soil. Thus i recommend to use a larger voltage. Why do you expect a different DC resistance when changing the polarity? I can do that test you suggested but i don't expect a difference. It could be interesting to rise the voltage from 0 to say 50V in small steps and note the current and then draw a graph. Then you would see the nonlinearity. I would expect that it is only visible below 10 V. > I think the impedance should be measured with AC and in fact at the > same frequency you are planning to use. Yes, sure. It is interesting to measure the frequency response of the feed point impedance. That tells something about the loop. I didn't do it carefully enough so far. > I will start such a page and once it has enough material in it, I will > let the mailing list know. Then I will be open to contributions of > content :-) > Looking forward to that. Pictures are most interesting for many people. An important part of such a page. Looking forward to that. > Just finished making a pair of impedance transformers. I used some > junk box large (OD=61.5mm, ID=37.5mm, L=12.8mm) ferrite toroids of > unknown material and I stacked two on each transformer. I then made an > autotransformer with a total of 52 turns tapped at 15 turns making > roughly a 4 ohm to 50 ohm transformer (48 ohm to 4 ohm to be pricese). > I wasn't aiming for 50 ohms it just happened to be the number of turns > that neatly fitted on the toroids!! A=3.2cm^2 and the calculated Bmax > for the expected power levels is less than 500 gauss so we are in > business. > Nice. I had to learn that 1 Gauss = 1E-4 Tesla. So then you have 50 mT, which is not much. I think that you can go 3x higher even. In some cases, a separate primary and secondary winding is helpful, for example to avoid EMC issues, ground loops and so on. Also for safety considerations. And especially when the impedance ratio is very high, i.e. the currents are very different. > I then did some tests with the amplifier, I connected the two 50 ohm > windings back to back and place the amplifier on one end and a 4 ohm > high wattage resistor at the other end. I was pleased to see that the > resistor got super hot and the transformers remained cool as a > cucumber. I was able to get on the resistor more than 100 watts from > f=3 kHz to 20 kHz, which reduced to 80 watts at 30 kHz. I can live > with that. The amplifier is nominally 100 W output per channel. > Very well. Cucumber, a word i had to learn. Do you know how to bridge the PA to get another 3 dB of output power? > Fingers crossed now I will get a chance to fire it up on the antenna > this weekend! > Good luck and fun. 73, Stefan