Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x1AA9HBd014785 for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2019 11:09:24 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gslxf-0000Ty-MA for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2019 10:03:43 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gslxd-0000Tp-Mn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2019 10:03:41 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gslxb-0007OU-VP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2019 10:03:40 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 638CE16005E for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2019 11:03:38 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1549793018; bh=ZEQ8rvpi0t3QikGwkhyZSXfxfhUSOtPTYFcO0ZJeXQY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=AvJU8xC9WfEGJ/oKy580tTGEAbFkfevn9rEnLDkhtGcf45oQTMiAOQlUb2aVI7tJb 3bZfv5YcJJNN/s+apQiccZ1T0rlRxkocY1Fbsir4ay/Udv3KJh6wERA9EDf5b93lJa jRdERmNzu5MjOFt3K6bkE6mUAkyFuilOsDIaJLONEU1AtHTidZyUYaIkOv9P1ILqCL 1KbDMEIVVPQuUpuCArOEhzZ77LTsw416Zx4u1vNs9/8pSiNfoazhTCsA1C1o8gisSy htphp0eZhm1Oi9sLxRrxBZWCgh2Pb+IO5hdvSa/TBIonfG9MakeH6oy93+3IP9xyvU MnkuE3h0xhRLg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 43y4Hs6Syjz6tmF for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2019 11:03:37 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5C5FF6F8.7000007@posteo.de> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 11:03:36 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <168d6970d7b.marcocadeddu@tin.it> In-Reply-To: <168d6970d7b.marcocadeddu@tin.it> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Dimitris, VLF, Am 10.02.2019 09:47, schrieb marcocadeddu@tin.it: > (RF? it is almost DC hihi) Ehm, no, it is almost LF! 29.5 kHz, you can't even hear that. The other (left) side of the audio spectrum that you can't [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: a6b6ffaf48fdddf1ed5c25dc4bf03ee1 Subject: Re: R: Re: VLF: in VK? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Dimitris, VLF, Am 10.02.2019 09:47, schrieb marcocadeddu@tin.it: > (RF? it is almost DC hihi) Ehm, no, it is almost LF! 29.5 kHz, you can't even hear that. The other (left) side of the audio spectrum that you can't hear too, maybe something below 30 Hz, that's close to DC :-) Am 09.02.2019 23:58, schrieb Dimitrios Tsifakis: > The unexpected losses are not just the > capacitors (their contribution is probably small). It is also the > coaxial cable that I used between the antenna feedpoint and the > amplifier. How long is that cable? And didn't you use a ferrite transformer to match the loop to the amplifier? If it is a normal audio amplifier that expects a 4 Ohm load, then maybe you don't need one, but then you should place the amp close to the loop, without the coax cable inbetween. If the loop is far from the house and you want to stay the amp into the shack, then use 2 ferrite transformers to transform up to 50 Ohm and then down to the antenna impedance again. I would place the amp in the shack and monitor voltage and current there using a scope. Then you see their ration (Impedance) and product = power (at resonance). I would first build a transformer that matches 4 Ohm to 50 Ohm for example, then use the cable, and then a transformer from 50 Ohm to the feedpoint impedance of the tuned loop. In the end, such a closed loop will not perform as good as a ground loop. You will get much better results when connecting two of these little ponds beeing some hunderet meter distant. The current will be lower and so the capacitors will be less stressed. BTW is your ground very dry? you could even try a dipole on the ground for the 630m band. A full size dipole. It would be able to carry much RF power :-) And what about a vertical antenna? Oh i see, i would spend several hours per day there building antennas! 73, Stefan