Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x15MpCSt012040 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 23:51:13 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gr9RA-000897-3b for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 22:43:28 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gr9OG-00088d-CX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 22:40:28 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gr9O7-0003iG-RJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 22:40:20 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2175216005D for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 23:40:17 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1549406418; bh=7MvvVWEC9IZwgxPsQdE43qYHfG0C3OykMEiL0Wv5KkQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=i5EYPXoVhRjesumkWeM6hmP86/twaAIcVnkJzF5bD3Fs6LefIvp84zsQvSmAgpAP4 o2eiV6hxSIt7kns/MOhx5KGiNcccYsamkaUBH1whiavVIIDiWVtMLjX6hR+GZUc95P pczS1LVRNkWZ+CW565SUAD4ftGnllGilUR/2dDQam+2VXAFjZCi64wwWkrBm5qh0FH V2OSAHu77N+Otme2ad75hTK67u2wfy1NRUC8e+UJCSJ+KLPwh3vqvUizn6WDUlYsHD //865SQj9AOiWGxntbJKLPvN8sVROqky1WdXi1ufrpZj4mZRWd4Kypfe4YWISfYcCl TG32Hiqgqs21A== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 43vKKF3WsSz6tm5 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 23:40:15 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5C5A10CE.5000702@posteo.de> Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 23:40:14 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1UTCTNxG9H.5T3bfQF3xD0@optiplex980-pc> <9C9C8088-AD45-4DDF-BD7E-66D13F0D835C@md.metrocast.net> <5C4B1BD5.6010404@posteo.de> <5C51DD4B.1070205@posteo.de> <5C57FC38.3020203@posteo.de> <5C59511C.8090901@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dimitris, Am 05.02.2019 21:14, schrieb Dimitrios Tsifakis: > G'day Stefan and Edgar, > > My house is on QF44OX00OR and the property extends to QF44NX (50 acres > or 200,000 m^2). I do have permission from some [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: f4625b23d277cf453c74a2300a95877d Subject: Re: VLF: in VK? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040508070400010208040207" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040508070400010208040207 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dimitris, Am 05.02.2019 21:14, schrieb Dimitrios Tsifakis: > G'day Stefan and Edgar, > > My house is on QF44OX00OR and the property extends to QF44NX (50 acres > or 200,000 m^2). I do have permission from some neighbours to lay > wires into their properties, so an extra large (over 1km) ground wire > is entirely doable but not at this point in time. Wow, i'm envious and happy that you have such possibilities!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Not at this time, ok. I would suggest to start in small steps anyway, then you can be happy about many improvements, not just a single big one :-) I often imagine to live in Canada or Australia and do such experiments exactly! > The reference loop > is from the shed, about 100 metres south of the house, to the tractor > shed. 100m is very close, the far field begins at about 5.7 km distance at 8.27 kHz. A RX in that distance is only useful to check and observe the signal stability and compare levels. A feedback monitor like my tree which is 3.5 km distant from my INV-L antenna in the city. From my ground loop antenna in JN39WI it is 57.6 km distant, which is already an interesting distance and can be challenging below 3 kHz. > I have mains in the shed and I also have a 200 W audio linear > amplifier to get things started. Excellent, just excellent! Your signal could be the stongest of the radio amateurs! 200W is just fine for the first steps. But be careful with those audio amplifiers, they do not seem to like to much reactive power. For tuning the antenna you will only need a capacitor in series. For my portable VLF system i built a current transformer to produce a small voltage that goes to the soundcard. Then, using SpecLab, i can calculate the antenna current directly and even keep the phase of the current stable, even if there should be a soundcard glitch. For the signal generation i also use SpecLab and a cheap GPS module. It all works very reliable, there were no problems so far. With a house at one of the ends of the antenna you are in a very comfortable situation! You may already have a ground system there, so the effort is at one end only. > I can build a class-E kilowatt if > necessary later. I like the roughly north-south loop configuration as > it favours many large cities (Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane and Tassie) > and most importantly Canberra which is only 30 km to the South. I will > try to get some signals received in Canberra before I start asking > people further away to have a listen. Yes, this is a very good distance to observe your own signal. If you have internet access there and can leave a small PC/notebook/tablet ... then you could build up a webpage and run a grabber from there like i do from my tree (still under maintenance). That would be ideal and it just feels good to see the own signal very clearly on a real RX in a short distance. You are then independent. > I currently have assembled an XO > clocked DDS controlled by an arduino to do the initial tests but later > when I decide to go QRSSSSSI can dig out and use the old rubidium > clock as a reference for extra stability. For receiving I use a 24 > bit, 192 kHz USB sound card and spectrum lab (thanks Wolf!). The > antenna I will use for receive is one of those monster ferrite rods. > Amplification may not even be necessary, the signals I get when the > antenna is tuned seem to be already quite good. Once I have a decent > RX antenna I think I will start gifting these rods (I have a few) to > interested amateurs in the region and help them get started with > receiving on VLF. Make a small army of receivers, that would make life > much easier when evaluating antennas! > Oh yes! Fortunately there are a few arround here. These days this is (sorted by distance to my VLF loop): DK7FC, DF6NM, DL0AO, DL4YHF, IK1QFK, Paul Nicholson, SQ5BPF and RN3AUS. Oh and W1VD, K3SIW and Edgar J.T. This is about the complete VLF group worldwide, at least those who prooved to detect narrow band (sub mHz) signals close to the limits, in the last 3 years until now. > Hey, you should document your experiments even if it is a summary of > the activities and nothing more. The list is great but perhaps we are > missing out on many other potentially interested people that may have > not discovered the list. Yes, you are right. I had the same thought sometimes. Certainly there are many amateurs who would feel like having a new life when starting at VLF, It is an unknown spectrum for 99.9 % of the amateurs. Actually it is not even amateur radio because it is not a spectrum allocated to amateur radio. So everyone could operate there. But there is a risk, you know. There are those people who do not simply start to transmit/receive there and feel good. There are those who prefer to ask if this is legal at all. And then they ask here and there, as long as they find someone who triggers their fears and phobs, and then they do nothing at all! Beware of such people, they are contaminating your free mind. Concentrate on ideas and wishes, like for example detecting your own signal in Canberra. And then the question "Will this also work on lower frequencies", for example. When writing an article in a radio magazine, what will be the result? Will it actually lead to more _active_ people on the band, who transmit and/or receive_ for a longer time, say at least 5 to 10 years_? Or will it rise a short interest only, dominated by people telling it is not legal and so on... I'm not sure about that. It could be even better to stay in a smaller group who can do what it wants instead causing a decision / regulation by an 'authority'. > You are clearly not lazy having achieved so > much on MF and below :-) > Thanks but i'm lazy into a certain spectrum. On the other side, there are people who write many articles over the years but it is simply impossible for them to even imagine to wind a coil which has more than 100 turns. Maybe it is good that there is a variety of people, the article writers and the coil winders and something inbetween :-) Oh, and the programmers! Very important. Without Wolfgang and Paul and Markus we would do nothing at all! Oh BTW maybe i'll transmit on my loop again the next weekend. I can't await it, it is more than 2 weeks ago, a very long time!! > I have played with ground loops before and had some good results in > LF. On VLF it should work much better (relative to a vertical E field antenna). The idea is that the current runs back in a deep layer (skin depth), depending on the ground conductivity. So it should work better on poor conducting ground. > Once I establish a reference system, I can compare antennas > including ground loops. Unlike Europe where you have plenty of people > around you, I have to do both the TXing and the RXing and that > requires effort and time. The latter is a very scarce resource! > > Anyway, looks like a nice day today to do some more outdoor work. We > had lightning storms and plenty of rain the past few days, so I > haven't made any progress. > RR, good luck and fun with the new challenges. Looking forward to your next steps and reports. 73, Stefan > 73, Dimitris VK2COW > --------------040508070400010208040207 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dimitris,

Am 05.02.2019 21:14, schrieb Dimitrios Tsifakis:
G'day Stefan and Edgar,

My house is on QF44OX00OR and the property extends to QF44NX (50 acres
or 200,000 m^2). I do have permission from some neighbours to lay
wires into their properties, so an extra large (over 1km) ground wire
is entirely doable but not at this point in time. 
Wow, i'm envious and happy that you have such possibilities!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Not at this time, ok. I would suggest to start in small steps anyway, then you can be happy about many improvements, not just a single big one :-)
I often imagine to live in Canada or Australia and do such experiments exactly!
The reference loop
is from the shed, about 100 metres south of the house, to the tractor
shed.
100m is very close, the far field begins at about 5.7 km distance at 8.27 kHz. A RX in that distance is only useful to check and observe the signal stability and compare levels. A feedback monitor like my tree which is 3.5 km distant from my INV-L antenna in the city. From my ground loop antenna in JN39WI it is 57.6 km distant, which is already an interesting distance and can be challenging below 3 kHz.

 I have mains in the shed and I also have a 200 W audio linear
amplifier to get things started.
Excellent, just excellent! Your signal could be the stongest of the radio amateurs! 200W is just fine for the first steps. But be careful with those audio amplifiers, they do not seem to like to much reactive power.
For tuning the antenna you will only need a capacitor in series. For my portable VLF system i built a current transformer to produce a small voltage that goes to the soundcard. Then, using SpecLab, i can calculate the antenna current directly and even keep the phase of the current stable, even if there should be a soundcard glitch. For the signal generation i also use SpecLab and a cheap GPS module. It all works very reliable, there were no problems so far.
With a house at one of the ends of the antenna you are in a very comfortable situation! You may already have a ground system there, so the effort is at one end only.

 I can build a class-E kilowatt if
necessary later. I like the roughly north-south loop configuration as
it favours many large cities (Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane and Tassie)
and most importantly Canberra which is only 30 km to the South. I will
try to get some signals received in Canberra before I start asking
people further away to have a listen.
Yes, this is a very good distance to observe your own signal. If you have internet access there and can leave a small PC/notebook/tablet ... then you could build up a webpage and run a grabber from there like i do from my tree (still under maintenance). That would be ideal and it just feels good to see the own signal very clearly on a real RX in a short distance. You are then independent.


 I currently have assembled an XO
clocked DDS controlled by an arduino to do the initial tests but later
when I decide to go QRSSSSSI can dig out and use the old rubidium
clock as a reference for extra stability. For receiving I use a 24
bit, 192 kHz USB sound card and spectrum lab (thanks Wolf!). The
antenna I will use for receive is one of those monster ferrite rods.
Amplification may not even be necessary, the signals I get when the
antenna is tuned seem to be already quite good. Once I have a decent
RX antenna I think I will start gifting these rods (I have a few) to
interested amateurs in the region and help them get started with
receiving on VLF. Make a small army of receivers, that would make life
much easier when evaluating antennas!
  
Oh yes! Fortunately there are a few arround here. These days this is (sorted by distance to my VLF loop): DK7FC, DF6NM, DL0AO, DL4YHF, IK1QFK, Paul Nicholson, SQ5BPF and RN3AUS. Oh and W1VD, K3SIW and Edgar J.T. This is about the complete VLF group worldwide, at least those who prooved to detect narrow band (sub mHz) signals close to the limits, in the last 3 years until now.

Hey, you should document your experiments even if it is a summary of
the activities and nothing more. The list is great but perhaps we are
missing out on many other potentially interested people that may have
not discovered the list.
Yes, you are right. I had the same thought sometimes. Certainly there are many amateurs who would feel like having a new life when starting at VLF, It is an unknown spectrum for 99.9 % of the amateurs. Actually it is not even amateur radio because it is not a spectrum allocated to amateur radio. So everyone could operate there.
But there is a risk, you know. There are those people who do not simply start to transmit/receive there and feel good. There are those who prefer to ask if this is legal at all. And then they ask here and there, as long as they find someone who triggers their fears and phobs, and then they do nothing at all! Beware of such people, they are contaminating your free mind. Concentrate on ideas and wishes, like for example detecting your own signal in Canberra. And then the question "Will this also work on lower frequencies", for example.
When writing an article in a radio magazine, what will be the result? Will it actually lead to more active people on the band, who transmit and/or receive for a longer time, say at least 5 to 10 years? Or will it rise a short interest only, dominated by people telling it is not legal and so on... I'm not sure about that. It could be even better to stay in a smaller group who can do what it wants instead causing a decision / regulation by an 'authority'.

 You are clearly not lazy having achieved so
much on MF and below :-)
  
Thanks but i'm lazy into a certain spectrum. On the other side, there are people who write many articles over the years but it is simply impossible for them to even imagine to wind a coil which has more than 100 turns. Maybe it is good that there is a variety of people, the article writers and the coil winders and something inbetween :-) Oh, and the programmers! Very important. Without Wolfgang and Paul and Markus we would do nothing at all!
Oh BTW maybe i'll transmit on my loop again the next weekend. I can't await it, it is more than 2 weeks ago, a very long time!!

I have played with ground loops before and had some good results in
LF.
On VLF it should work much better (relative to a vertical E field antenna). The idea is that the current runs back in a deep layer (skin depth), depending on the ground conductivity. So it should work better on poor conducting ground.
 Once I establish a reference system, I can compare antennas
including ground loops. Unlike Europe where you have plenty of people
around you, I have to do both the TXing and the RXing and that
requires effort and time. The latter is a very scarce resource!

Anyway, looks like a nice day today to do some more outdoor work. We
had lightning storms and plenty of rain the past few days, so I
haven't made any progress.
  
RR, good luck and fun with the new challenges.
Looking forward to your next steps and reports.

73, Stefan



73, Dimitris VK2COW

--------------040508070400010208040207--