Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x14Ja9pd004148 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 20:36:17 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gqjs4-0005Lm-C7 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 19:25:32 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gqjs3-0005Ld-8I for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 19:25:31 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gqjs0-0000IX-UC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 19:25:30 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73D952400FD for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 20:25:25 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1549308325; bh=HRQ5tfc41Ma/xrpvVXEeZlOLFotDVN8emVMLNbDDpk8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=lFTn137d9qQXJ6Gl1xxsfvmivDsrNqTiSiq1pwIRrNwtyjMBE27DpXJzYdfL1yNV8 62Ijvm6KKeSla2bwR3lLF/Qynu482P6XLnEKgWxQDBJmkBGiGk1Hx8/w6KxvqIBATM k03MjWzQoDZrEsQgwFGdqiAxR8ku72HRL6doGyG6D/J005/5982vea8FkgiUDBM+iJ MJ7frKp8EEFQWqACx+2didVRpFwl2fHL3lU8Q63R3afseXTbh6KBYUm8J4mELHLmdj ffhLROjDLJXpYy0oGHT4KE3kW6R9+MSzqu6N081LEmQQcKGSvopYfXaOVBSsskMbat Fy2aCLovIddUQ== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 43td2s0TBKz9rxX for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 20:25:24 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5C5891A3.9080408@posteo.de> Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 20:25:23 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1771146765.20190204122151@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1771146765.20190204122151@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Chris, For a clever person it is very easy :-) It will depend on which way you want to generate WSPR. Here, for example, i have a Raspi which generates my WSPR (2) for MF. I modified the c source code so tha [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.66 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: 2e2f7cbbe9f38dd7bf3fac4fc012e6fc Subject: Re: LF: Naive WSPR15 question Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello Chris, For a clever person it is very easy :-) It will depend on which way you want to generate WSPR. Here, for example, i have a Raspi which generates my WSPR (2) for MF. I modified the c source code so that the frequency is 4 times higher and the frequency shift is 4 times higher too. In my PA, probably like in yours, there is a frequency divider using CD4013 ICs which reproduce the desired frequency and frequency shift. Of course this can be done with a factor 2 too. For Windows solutions, there is DF6NMs tool for slow WSPR which works very reliable here, for WSPR-2 and WSPR-15. I'm sure this can be modified for twice the frequency shift but then you will need an upconverter to convert it to LF or MF... 73, Stefan Am 04.02.2019 13:21, schrieb Chris Wilson: > > Hello LF, > > A naive question re WSPR15 please? Assuming the source code is > available how hard would it be for a clever person to add X2 > functionality to it? Thanks. > >