Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x14910c0000582 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 10:01:01 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gqZw8-0004K2-QY for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 08:49:04 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gqZv4-0004Jt-AC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 08:47:58 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gqZv1-0007MP-OB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 08:47:57 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E14CE16006A for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 09:47:53 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1549270074; bh=Vx0yrXDemn1Rpx9quGebWzoDAfYab4X87TcNk6Czz0I=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=GY368LajgXNGwGs572deHrp28ZdKVjHmR8WBwQvE4LkPtPeX5klAPHdqJ3tynORp7 lD1EYF/nIF/58STmpWC8SA6OrzBC9Kjx7SJAmIKduoARcblQYT/f5HEBI+mJLHtcft UAMFqJ4Brl7Kmf5qRiLin5rhh0pefl1k2SnfYrGtlx1sKZdqgfCUezgJtqzg3U+TgG 9s/tA3jJYJpG3qdQcdkvIfQjouDMJt6oRe9qo124wJF6n/4Y3h8Vpq5BfzT9k4tQBQ i43Qqn6tWt+3WMl8x79wCVkYgvAnjk8+MUsLGZ9py64vtllot0tS9/AhR1ot4MO/my QphHz3UxK4dVg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 43tLvD3pb3z6tm6 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 09:47:52 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5C57FC38.3020203@posteo.de> Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 09:47:52 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1UTCTNxG9H.5T3bfQF3xD0@optiplex980-pc> <9C9C8088-AD45-4DDF-BD7E-66D13F0D835C@md.metrocast.net> <5C4B1BD5.6010404@posteo.de> <5C51DD4B.1070205@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Dimitris, Thanks, very kind. If your's is even larger and has just 1 nF, then it will be just adequate :-) Another radio amateur from Germany offered me two capacitors wich will be suitable. They seem to be alr [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: fb3e28a759dea7e01d34d3fe7de7ae98 Subject: Re: LF: TXing WSPR/MF on an indoor loop, part 2 / VLF in VK? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Dimitris, Thanks, very kind. If your's is even larger and has just 1 nF, then it will be just adequate :-) Another radio amateur from Germany offered me two capacitors wich will be suitable. They seem to be already on the way in the post. I wonder how this indoor loop performs as an RX antenna. Of course it will depend on the neighbours QRM but maybe it is not as bad as expected. Then, i could try to arrange a JT9 QSO or maybe QRSS... If the other station is 20 dB stronger, then i could have a higher QRM level... What about your VLF experiments, what is the next step? What was the locator of your 120m antenna? Could you build a longer antenna? Maybe you like to try a ground loop? Did you follow the recent experiments from my 900m long antenna on 8270 Hz? It is the best experimentation field that VLF amateur radio offers these days :-) My recommendation :-) 73, Stefan Am 04.02.2019 06:54, schrieb Dimitrios Tsifakis: > Hi all, > > I have a few mica capacitors that came from a MW broadcaster, similar > to this one (in fact I have one that it bigger than this one). > > Stefan, I think this is probably your best bet and pity you are not > closer otherwise I would be happy to lend you a couple to do your > experiments :-) > > https://rustys.net.au/products/large-ducon-transmitter-honey-pot-capacitor > > (this is smaller than the ones I have, most are about 1 nF capacitance) > > 73, Dimitris VK2COW > > Στις Πέμ, 31 Ιαν 2019 στις 10:01 μ.μ., ο/η dhchurch > έγραψε: > >> Hello Dimitrios >> >> Polypropylene capacitors can actually self-heal to such an extent that there's little left of them. The melting point of polypropylene is not very high and they can end up as just a liitle blob of plastic. >> >> Don't worry though, I still use them suitably rated for the frequency in use and most of them are 600Vac or more. >> >> 73, Hugh, M0DSZ >> >> ----- Receiving the following content ----- >> From: Dimitrios Tsifakis >> Receiver: rsgb_lf_group >> Time: 2019-01-31, 00:25:55 >> Subject: Re: LF: TXing WSPR/MF on an indoor loop, part 2 >> >> Hi Stefan, >> >> In my experience these polypropylene capacitors when they fail, they >> just lose some capacitance. I think they call it 'self healing', maybe >> they imply that when they fail there is no short circuit? >> >> I have some really nice silver mica capacitors (ex MW broadcast stuff) >> that would be perfect for this task... >> >> Anyway, I am slowly gearing up for some VLF action over here. The >> other day I did some tests at 16.72 kHz into an ugly loop (very >> roughly 120 metres by 3 metres, single turn) and I was able to receive >> my signals using an unoptimise ferrite antenna at a bit over 2 km from >> the TX. I don't think I am in the near field at that distance, am I? >> :-) >> >> 73, Dimitris VK2COW >> >> >>> >> >