Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x13E3c0F026825 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2019 15:03:44 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gqIHo-0002S3-Pf for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2019 13:58:16 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gqIHi-0002Ru-Qp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2019 13:58:10 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gqIHh-00057B-3Q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2019 13:58:09 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 103D12400E5 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2019 14:58:06 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1549202287; bh=4eY+vZXPOxE5nDKCe9ChLfKfxZu/HwlAAj7HI+NtDTI=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=Gz3JDi9XDWZJW9bqOISBXPDhDZshSizEkXNeYpPEIPZkO8UEZyd19YPndsa3lmpm2 WMgsF5f+4VZ1IdtztuinDRQCSNLBEF2nCQ9IrrCCMR+ITF/80y272wPJINzorcUT4w j1SBwD1xdTFgbesHlHvu7yVGEPmWW3tvPWlVBOnPBuDNp50dygt7Da8s/W8dwoYgR1 Ni8yhQH1Jg5xeAAEouaLIy97b/XikTD8AAsD0tdWKsHFSN79WJBNwtUBWb/Y5D1im9 qwN+jb5pOo5kZxgmmo3E8FEh5vvevaLpoqCd1C0nYUEVPcXqNImX+VcXpf5cwCJK+R v4sJmSERPmdlA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 43ssqd3MK3z9rxW for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2019 14:58:04 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5C56F36C.2070906@posteo.de> Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2019 14:58:04 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1UTCTNxG9H.5T3bfQF3xD0@optiplex980-pc><9C9C8088-AD45-4DDF-BD7E-66D13F0D835C@md.metrocast.net> <5C4B1BD5.6010404@posteo.de> <5C51DD4B.1070205@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: ...indeed! Since more than 72 hours i'm running the WSPR transmission in 25% duty cycle (each 8 minutes). First i tuned to 20 A antenna current and the temperature / antenna current changes were much [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.66 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 52d17ee6003fa6763aae891a69410baf Subject: Re: LF: TXing WSPR/MF on an indoor loop, part 2 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020103010708050004010203" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020103010708050004010203 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ...indeed! Since more than 72 hours i'm running the WSPR transmission in 25% duty cycle (each 8 minutes). First i tuned to 20 A antenna current and the temperature / antenna current changes were much smaller. But there was a certain click, or krrrrkkrt audible from the Cs. It was likely that there were indeed internal voltage breakthroughs, which were self-healing. Now after 3 days the current dropped again to 14 A, meaning that the capacity dropped, so the loop became detuned and so the RF current and voltages dropped to a level which is accepted by the capacitors. So my conclusion is, the derating curves actually should be considered. I wonder if the effect is still happening if one keeps the temperatures down at 25 C or even lower. When placing the capacitors in de-ionised iced water, it should be possible to keep the temperatures down, also in the internal of the capacitor. But all in all this is not a good solution. Fortunately i have another antenna which is more efficient :-) 73, Stefan Am 31.01.2019 11:54, schrieb dhchurch: > Hello Dimitrios > Polypropylene capacitors can actually self-heal to such an extent that > there's little left of them. The melting point of polypropylene is not > very high and they can end up as just a liitle blob of plastic. > Don't worry though, I still use them suitably rated for the frequency > in use and most of them are 600Vac or more. > 73, Hugh, M0DSZ > > ----- Receiving the following content ----- > *From:* Dimitrios Tsifakis > *Receiver:* rsgb_lf_group > *Time:* 2019-01-31, 00:25:55 > *Subject:* Re: LF: TXing WSPR/MF on an indoor loop, part 2 > > Hi Stefan, > > In my experience these polypropylene capacitors when they fail, they > just lose some capacitance. I think they call it 'self healing', maybe > they imply that when they fail there is no short circuit? > > I have some really nice silver mica capacitors (ex MW broadcast stuff) > that would be perfect for this task... > > Anyway, I am slowly gearing up for some VLF action over here. The > other day I did some tests at 16.72 kHz into an ugly loop (very > roughly 120 metres by 3 metres, single turn) and I was able to receive > my signals using an unoptimise ferrite antenna at a bit over 2 km from > the TX. I don't think I am in the near field at that distance, am I? > :-) > > 73, Dimitris VK2COW > > > > --------------020103010708050004010203 Content-Type: text/html; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ...indeed! Since more than 72 hours i'm running the WSPR transmission in 25% duty cycle (each 8 minutes). First i tuned to 20 A antenna current and the temperature / antenna current changes were much smaller. But there was a certain click, or krrrrkkrt audible from the Cs. It was likely that there were indeed internal voltage breakthroughs, which were self-healing. Now after 3 days the current dropped again to 14 A, meaning that the capacity dropped, so the loop became detuned and so the RF current and voltages dropped to a level which is accepted by the capacitors.

So my conclusion is, the derating curves actually should be considered.

I wonder if the effect is still happening if one keeps the temperatures down at 25 C or even lower. When placing the capacitors in de-ionised iced water, it should be possible to keep the temperatures down, also in the internal of the capacitor.

But all in all this is not a good solution. Fortunately i have another antenna which is more efficient :-)

73, Stefan


Am 31.01.2019 11:54, schrieb dhchurch:
Hello Dimitrios
 
Polypropylene capacitors can actually self-heal to such an extent that there's little left of them. The melting point of polypropylene is not very high and they can end up as just a liitle blob of plastic. 
 
Don't worry though, I still use them suitably rated for the frequency in use and most of them are 600Vac or more.
 
73, Hugh, M0DSZ
----- Receiving the following content -----
Receiver: rsgb_lf_group
Time: 2019-01-31, 00:25:55
Subject: Re: LF: TXing WSPR/MF on an indoor loop, part 2

Hi Stefan,

In my experience these polypropylene capacitors when they fail, they
just lose some capacitance. I think they call it 'self healing', maybe
they imply that when they fail there is no short circuit?

I have some really nice silver mica capacitors (ex MW broadcast stuff)
that would be perfect for this task...

Anyway, I am slowly gearing up for some VLF action over here. The
other day I did some tests at 16.72 kHz into an ugly loop (very
roughly 120 metres by 3 metres, single turn) and I was able to receive
my signals using an unoptimise ferrite antenna at a bit over 2 km from
the TX. I don't think I am in the near field at that distance, am I?
:-)

73, Dimitris VK2COW

>

--------------020103010708050004010203--