Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x1QGH6TB007362 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 17:17:12 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gyfIs-000291-0u for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 16:09:58 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gyfIr-00028s-AS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 16:09:57 +0000 Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gyfIp-0000oK-JS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 16:09:56 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id f14so14602056wrg.1 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 08:09:55 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZouAo+xls+Fv473XuLuiycqv+EN5KMG7BdyF3BkyUzE=; b=SP+potY8WBQF/8PCMNtcbhZ+y5T0Xw46q8voGfJpOZK4J/gUXpT8k9x6wdv7bzqRFl QOj4gBD6IyumFdPXR5twO9KTQoePMDLjXKEPIIGAymivzGfwmD3a3jcIgS3eb0U5mcUY mI9/XCeM2u4ficxLm01fKz5Va2HQ4p4CPgRyXVIDlTaAd0z2C2jwvA8tAuL50p5fcJHa U696t84PZcji36RJ+KwoLlo0C4HE85DTdOeaxYSlPTYVrJeAAZRO52W6NG6O5EfdnFOz Gv8bUdg//DsHZ4AfD+bRTb63+hzjpVxZxwQ1xiJI4rz3IOutzBTfIOv+TDotJ8rPnBXe pN7w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZouAo+xls+Fv473XuLuiycqv+EN5KMG7BdyF3BkyUzE=; b=f/DnQ0ACtiJIoZFjNKO+VK6s+D8XOfppJ3KyD3Ec6CWXtH1z4hXsLr5unbWp2R8HvH WM1twOTSIABb7vh4hNScIM09xtOgKlI59JXX7+azOWh0EBqhRBzep8kBxBfWvVkU3XNX ypmNFMjG+ZsO9jyq/ifpUinlqQoVV01aUCCvpbzEhI4AaU83ciRSEQI01eM3EuK2h+52 LkAvHSrotwDTozKK9uTZCCV5ayH4OYmmISN1hbLoGaZSUX5zuChjMTcgiFehPsf1cQLy zXTQ42h17+Sk+o+4gxnPbzCFFhOU44Qy7nQlb6xR12nkrNK78HGW/WbPuoxCQKBOeeMX yx0g== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuYTfYf5hkWlMffoPTfrVG5HBy3QI28f40ZmdfRWZC+VWPhx9c/X O9WJK2d0fpnCsiI5mC3WfMu+9eZ1 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IY0GZqF34wjzDE0/ULmuP01P4NofsDXJ78ieL4nl9nKLrkGEMCWHNn0JsXezo/OePJxpQrN9g== X-Received: by 2002:adf:c54d:: with SMTP id s13mr16400212wrf.169.1551197393537; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 08:09:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u4sm11220172wmb.25.2019.02.26.08.09.51 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Feb 2019 08:09:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 16:09:50 +0000 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <21240445.20190226160950@gmail.com> To: Eric NO3M In-Reply-To: <0a79de5c-3274-caae-c000-d5f49bb44540@no3m.net> References: <942860C848184BA2A0A9103E0EE56DF7@DELL4> <1UTEEgOcyQ.DAejAuRZtn9@optiplex980-pc> <92784b07-a799-fb4e-9080-e1e8bb167b75@n1bug.com> <1UTEEhG1Ft.EdI1dlVbFOZ@optiplex980-pc> <3062ef19-bb69-3187-e8db-6a6bf5050739@n1bug.com> <234098919.20190226111836@gmail.com> <0a79de5c-3274-caae-c000-d5f49bb44540@no3m.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Eric, Yes, the output is a square wave when I use the U3S I take the output direct from CLK0 at 2X frequency (set in the U3S menu) via a co-ax to the input of the W1VD amp to Pin 3 of 74F74 with no 50 Ohm l [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:436 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) X-Scan-Signature: 49f0f587e44d6711c57b8a4e950ba850 Subject: Re: LF: Class D current spikes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello Eric, Yes, the output is a square wave when I use the U3S I take the output direct from CLK0 at 2X frequency (set in the U3S menu) via a co-ax to the input of the W1VD amp to Pin 3 of 74F74 with no 50 Ohm load resistor. It works perfectly. It makes me think other exciters are doing something different at the end of the TX cycle. I know not what though... The amp is powered all the time, the output solely depends on the presence or not of an input signal. Same with the TS-590S, output from the DRV socket at under 0dBm sine wave at 2X frequency from the 590 into a squarer. Squarer drives the W1VD amp the same, (no 50 ohm resistor) direct to Pin 3 of the 74F74. no issues. Run the 590 at 136kHz into a W1VD doubler and a pre amp and the FETS's life is always short. Death always seemingly occurs at the end of a WSPR or OPERA cycle. Again the amp stays powered all the time from either a huge linear supply or an HP SMPS 50V supply from a server. I have noted that running the over current limiter on the linear on the cusp of triggering helps. The SMPS is ruthless in the doubler scenario and FET life is *always* on the edge. The gate waveforms seem OK, it's the drain waveform that shows the spikes as the oscillations decay away. I would love to get to the bottom of this as I have too many different set ups to remember :) I assumed it was some sort of feedback from the antenna perhaps, but I am a novice and once I found what saved me from spending loads at Farnell I gave up chasing the cause. Tuesday, February 26, 2019, 12:12:08 PM, you wrote: > Or in the case of a U3S with a square wave output at CLK0 (I assume it's > square)... a complete positive half cycle without any further "noise", etc. > On 2/26/19 7:04 AM, Eric NO3M wrote: >> Just a thought, perhaps the RF is ending exactly at a zero crossing, >> whereas a typical PC/soundcard + exciter may not be and that is >> causing this issue. -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com