Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x1QHCxCV007673 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 18:13:01 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gygD5-0002Qb-D4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 17:08:03 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gygD4-0002QS-N2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 17:08:02 +0000 Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::430]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gygD3-0000xf-5Z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 17:08:01 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id n2so14792153wrw.8 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 09:08:01 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Xodq9nBVTZcJSiGgyIhFVe4Zvg1sRfqmsi6nqyHrZAQ=; b=DGHNq7fMx/dX4spROKoPW2nrdApL2t6WETkdATfzYB/vAg8cYOIgYfYsPzH8fpzAK3 tnb/nrAn15JPlPHUH+rv6GZO+xn+PyCV9AtcIrilVbm2D55krnb6wDx2Du/7/SDYHxNq bZoNfm/BAxQV9wyBF7ZT371O45gqxO67U6REs8r1TSvzeMa+XamaTrLlzWoQlMkmu+Dc Nts61jvn06OIH25j3ZKedSuSkD1Trj4BzVkSJt1NHQ44VH8pp863U5HjrSY1EAxiXCJO SVk2I+XhmoHfNZI5xzwiljIOxEgq5jmXN1D1xs58LAWN/CeT8k2+QKN8bzg7r4hso5P+ IM6Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Xodq9nBVTZcJSiGgyIhFVe4Zvg1sRfqmsi6nqyHrZAQ=; b=Wro/yQt+ytVLOi0FNd7VfeVfkIkCKHTQpZNcuBn/3Y0jcZsJSjra5uesFvt1DjG98L mONnFH1sMdTD0X+rl0b/7bazWt+tRTClNlT9w4XNtv+G6r9eiYk6DhpctJ5BIpMwJkNk aZAzr/XHF2ZOfisOuevnlrc/lhLmR1wO5EmJv3lFhuIWiFFBKz8XhRSvQxESiazgF3kW WrUa7j8tvJOnfXManafhnIQ5vts99wNxS1+vpqLaCT5MZHSFZ9EFjd5fy7ZvLMNcvBzS vLFosW32TDUFitoQqFI7fLqKaS5gnqUyPSwaiPSdL75qBpDv9TzWJplAX03aqt+t7ncB b9Ww== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAubh7pWWOoUXUNc2S9AU1Ig1XV9gkS/OOOYQ5fMjz59yaOpM2jsP HP/Gp1kpbY4qNJ7HGfZXgkusozzq X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IYlxb1ebu1bmTs8alDJS8eNcWmuhCnVLicHCv7Iz13KWQZ0+hWwqD+F8WwOj7Yt5IX4NjOoKg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1287:: with SMTP id f7mr18137693wrx.203.1551200880140; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 09:08:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a24sm98995wmm.1.2019.02.26.09.07.58 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Feb 2019 09:07:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 17:07:57 +0000 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1701178244.20190226170757@gmail.com> To: Andy Talbot In-Reply-To: References: <942860C848184BA2A0A9103E0EE56DF7@DELL4> <1UTEEgOcyQ.DAejAuRZtn9@optiplex980-pc> <92784b07-a799-fb4e-9080-e1e8bb167b75@n1bug.com> <1UTEEhG1Ft.EdI1dlVbFOZ@optiplex980-pc> <3062ef19-bb69-3187-e8db-6a6bf5050739@n1bug.com> <234098919.20190226111836@gmail.com> <0a79de5c-3274-caae-c000-d5f49bb44540@no3m.net> <21240445.20190226160950@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Andy, Thanks for that! Bearing in mind i am not the sharpest knife in this drawer, would that perhaps explain why the U3S Si5351a output drives more reliably at 3.3V than say the output of a doubler / pre a [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:430 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) X-Scan-Signature: 195b836cb7437e99aa05107459888659 Subject: Re: LF: Class D current spikes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id x1QHCxCV007673 Hello Andy, Thanks for that! Bearing in mind i am not the sharpest knife in this drawer, would that perhaps explain why the U3S Si5351a output drives more reliably at 3.3V than say the output of a doubler / pre amp (and I was never happy about the pre amp output level being correct...), and perhaps the output from the squarer also being more "reliable"? Would you be able to sketch an interface design to try please? Thanks again, are we getting somewhere? ;) Tuesday, February 26, 2019, 4:38:15 PM, you wrote: > AH - HA !!!!!!!!!!!! > Therein may lie your problem.   If you take your input direct to > the 74F74 clock and don't hit that with anything other than a square > wave you are bound to have problems.   TTL devices (and F series > really IS real TTL) get very unhappy with slow edges and can > oscillate or show instability at the edges > Even if you precede that with the classic inverter and linearising > resistor, at low frequencies you will often see instability.   That > fed-back gate design usually works fine at tens of MHz and up, even > MHz, but expect instability at kHz frequencies.   Look at the output > on a scope, and don't be surprised to see ringing on the edges , > especially at low drive levels, and low drive levels are just what > you get when the input waveform is keyed on / off > At these frequencies, linear to logic conversion really MUST be > done with a Schmitt trigger.   74xCT14 or similar.   Use the ACT or > HCT families as opposed to the HC or AC ones as they have a smaller > hysteresis between Vin(HI) and Vin(lo), allowing for lower amplitude > drive.  They also need different centre biassing for AC coupled > signals.  Assuming a 5V rail, Use 2.5V  for HC and AC families,  1.8V for ACT and  HCT devices. > Or an RS422 / RS485  line receiver works well; that has even lower > hysteresis and hence lower permitted drive level. > Andy > www.g4jnt.com -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com