Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x1QCHgID006297 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 13:17:43 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gybaz-0001Rn-TU for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:12:25 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gybau-0001Re-OQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:12:20 +0000 Received: from 576e.8172.0000.0000.0210.4001.0d0f.7062.ip6.static.sl-reverse.com ([2607:f0d0:1004:120::2718:e675] helo=mx1.lylix.net) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gybat-0000Kt-4c for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:12:19 +0000 Received: from no3m.local (dynamic-acs-24-144-206-160.zoominternet.net [24.144.206.160]) (Authenticated sender: eric@lylix.net) by mx1.lylix.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78CFE1A408C5 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:12:09 -0500 (EST) From: Eric NO3M To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <942860C848184BA2A0A9103E0EE56DF7@DELL4> <1UTEEgOcyQ.DAejAuRZtn9@optiplex980-pc> <92784b07-a799-fb4e-9080-e1e8bb167b75@n1bug.com> <1UTEEhG1Ft.EdI1dlVbFOZ@optiplex980-pc> <3062ef19-bb69-3187-e8db-6a6bf5050739@n1bug.com> <234098919.20190226111836@gmail.com> Message-ID: <0a79de5c-3274-caae-c000-d5f49bb44540@no3m.net> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:12:08 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Or in the case of a U3S with a square wave output at CLK0 (I assume it's square)... a complete positive half cycle without any further "noise", etc. On 2/26/19 7:04 AM, Eric NO3M wrote: > Just a thought, perhaps the RF is ending exactly at a zero crossing, > whereas a typical PC/soundcard + exciter may not be and that is > causing this issue. Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 KHOP_DYNAMIC Relay looks like a dynamic address X-Scan-Signature: ddae800c6581715278ab3184b42d46db Subject: Re: LF: Class D current spikes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Or in the case of a U3S with a square wave output at CLK0 (I assume it's square)... a complete positive half cycle without any further "noise", etc. On 2/26/19 7:04 AM, Eric NO3M wrote: > Just a thought, perhaps the RF is ending exactly at a zero crossing, > whereas a typical PC/soundcard + exciter may not be and that is > causing this issue.