Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x0OLClaK025778 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 22:12:53 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gmmEW-0003y9-4r for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 21:08:20 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gmmEU-0003y0-Jq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 21:08:18 +0000 Received: from mail-ed1-x532.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::532]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gmmES-0007jb-A6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 21:08:17 +0000 Received: by mail-ed1-x532.google.com with SMTP id a20so5726126edc.8 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:08:15 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Xr9sNp+OZzUdc3sHS/HzYjIrQufctaMUJsFZ0avH7W4=; b=S0Sig1BzSBoQYSZLYFgp5Rshrt6tPg4BX9NuNdR0IR9woW9b082TzdikXiEMfS16bI 3MsEC01zwyiLlKnAZko5UPwyU7+ui3krNnE9h3/bs+8EkxtXD5rPV3p23E/hwP18X/wd RiNjubkF0PkrqXAh9iACYNLI1CevSwNGxipv2VwggiIW63OIA1TEYkirDx/rLsWNbp9G Uk04EgC1iruioqde68oHM+QTZO5MWFFZ0NtSu1XVoRVbidOUg7XJEbe9AtzcYajLxW5U e+nYk5vrAFp33m8If33hYELTCEAdVry9Kv34yDU+KGloI2fJElzMmFFzD7CP2c8xi/uU Qtrw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Xr9sNp+OZzUdc3sHS/HzYjIrQufctaMUJsFZ0avH7W4=; b=oETEV1JYW6WTECpKdILPkrZyLJdeJ9YdrzIgSPWyIqUzSmFDoG7F3USXNwyQRx3rmY EzNiDc/7+aNR+9gI0gfybZ1t+oVbLLxwlNeOre+wWkaIpBo95AYqh32qVhEz5aJXcBeT ECJI64EBE3pW1aNDWkFBl07bB6z6k0HWWEg+WHPfz/GsJjJ/XEQIw+qvCCv+/y0T2yWm K9t3xLvhtbFX5RqNPfVz9lTD1UIqS1RUCabIRdGYC1GiolpcrM99bWDEYZ9dfzv//BZm GWJLLXgpG9PdIGpocfzfOzUoHm131wARgtYV+lQpocaoO2t0C7C4Mav4CRchZqiUdMA7 Uy5w== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUuketYtA6ipo3Q7XKXLVqqxb9NygoRi8EyfQ84zg9y9bPLfqWmwBN J+e5Kz0MUvFQ08X5jtJIDvON+S3yvpIi8cEiEllxbg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4YzoHln+5ruDI29FWYt11OgE3tl9G7ZETIctl8kisV9ThYzrbboSaHrDZYDhh5irEEmOqaBPNsQ7EcQvZ31zI= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1f09:: with SMTP id w9-v6mr7285923ejj.22.1548364093492; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:08:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1UTCSIDCaF.1ZaNrHmL5ZJ@optiplex980-pc> <5D357392-08EC-4FC6-B14C-3669F05DCB2D@md.metrocast.net> In-Reply-To: <5D357392-08EC-4FC6-B14C-3669F05DCB2D@md.metrocast.net> From: Riccardo Zoli Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 22:08:01 +0100 Message-ID: To: LF Group X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Jay, Rob, LF Ok, many thanks! I understand the high noise last night. Rob: my QRG may be almost exactly 137545 Hz, with probably minor variations (at least a few hundred of uHz) due to propagation's doppler effect [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:532 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (riccardozoli80[at]gmail.com) 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (riccardozoli80[at]gmail.com) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails X-Scan-Signature: 318d3d373f5ffaa82e0969bd1985b258 Subject: Re: LF: EbNaut tonite Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c6915c05803a9bcd" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTML_30_40, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --000000000000c6915c05803a9bcd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Jay, Rob, LF Ok, many thanks! I understand the high noise last night. Rob: my QRG may be almost exactly 137545 Hz, with probably minor variations (at least a few hundred of uHz) due to propagation's doppler effect near the terminator. Now I'm on air with an unmodulated carrier on the same QRG, then: *QRG: 137545 Hz* *Coding 8K19A* *CRC 12* *5 sec./sym.* *3 characters* *no time delay* *duration: 32 min.* *Message repeated hourly, 1st on 2200z, last on 0700z.* *Unmodulated carrier from xx:32 to xx:00 minute.* Reports are welcome (noise permitting). All the best 73 de Riccardo IW4DXW Il giorno Gio 24 Gen 2019, 18:14 Rob Renoud ha scritto: > Riccardo, > > As with Jay, no decodes last night likely due to extremely night noise > levels here too (+10 to +20 dB over S9). Believe I did capture your > carrier on the SL Spectrum Display from 2230 - 2300 UTC just prior to the > high noise levels taking over the band. > > The displayed carrier, that could be your signal, was observed at > 137544.975 Hz on the two RX systems I ran last night. Does that correspond > to your primary frequency source? > > 73, > Rob - K3RWR > > > > > On Jan 24, 2019, at 06:10, "jrusgrove@comcast.net" < > jrusgrove@comcast.net> wrote: > > > > Riccardo > > > > Unfortunately there were no decodes last night. QRN levels were quite > high due to a large storm in the Gulf of Mexico. > > > > Jay W1VD > > > --000000000000c6915c05803a9bcd Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Jay, Rob, L= F


Ok, many thanks! I understand the high noise last night.
Rob: my QRG may be almost exactly 137545 Hz, with probably minor= variations (at least a few hundred of uHz) due to propagation's dopple= r effect near the terminator.
Now I'm on air wit= h an unmodulated carrier on the same QRG, then:

=
QRG: 137545 Hz
Coding 8K19A
CRC 12
5 sec./sym.
3 characters=
no time delay
duration: 32 min.
<= b>
Message repeated hourly, 1s= t on 2200z, last on 0700z.

Unmodulated carrier from xx:32 to xx= :00 minute.

Reports are welcome (noise= permitting).


=
All the best

73 de Riccardo IW4DXW


Il giorno Gio 24 Gen 2019, 18:14 Rob Renoud <k3rwr@md.metrocast.net> ha scritto:
Riccardo,

As with Jay, no decodes last night likely due to extremely night noise leve= ls here too (+10 to +20 dB over S9).=C2=A0 Believe I did capture your carri= er on the SL Spectrum Display from 2230 - 2300 UTC just prior to the high n= oise levels taking over the band.

The displayed carrier, that could be your signal, was observed at 137544.97= 5 Hz on the two RX systems I ran last night.=C2=A0 Does that correspond to = your primary frequency source?

73,
Rob - K3RWR



> On Jan 24, 2019, at 06:10, "jrusgrove@co= mcast.net" <jrusgrove@comcast.net&= gt; wrote:
>
> Riccardo
>=C2=A0
> Unfortunately there were no decodes last night. QRN levels were quite = high due to a large storm in the Gulf of Mexico.
>=C2=A0
> Jay W1VD


--000000000000c6915c05803a9bcd--