Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x02BwsJJ018941 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 12:58:55 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gef27-0003gD-Ks for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 11:49:59 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1geeyj-0003fe-09 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 11:46:29 +0000 Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1geeyf-0007ty-A1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 11:46:27 +0000 Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id h50so25948560ede.5 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 03:46:24 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=IWxEijHNJ2aSSYYPcSiEFr3aiM4FxlO/+HCVPVzZmVM=; b=rVeRS9Z1w+5rZYd9dZaCZa6SwpyLPlnfPGuUN7liiV8scgEQWANs/uAZ25m+TqBLe/ FB1+ttf+LBxSyGid40Rqwkj5iVHeSWxZoTKkVNwXFY8hP6yLrKuiZ5kJkMRrB+nKENU/ GNa6sp1UQgFFaD0VL8l8hVJHRsiivtjaqTbzJisUW7K3bKXGBcWJTFB+mjGscDdT+XPE tINtHHiXCmZx5WjMosbyoB5a52odZs3VtBULmTsxJVsLke9F//DMN5hNMFXwVNkYq+Tw WfPVCYc7ceGIvmcTbwJYmmeIkowj0u2BBGC+6qGWW5NsWLseqXSQNUBLETcyFjtKMnPc 2tyg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=IWxEijHNJ2aSSYYPcSiEFr3aiM4FxlO/+HCVPVzZmVM=; b=gekevvgN5e4tXSUcSZSHv+8gg50mA3rFiINP4twBtDy1ubYw7WGCMBCe7drj8y6lDF TycGnW26UbhQnut6rPWFwJWWzDyfHm0gG/MxG0Na3NHfetWJpUStIVGmkvcCO+3iDxuJ R875fWCNAJm8jK74547jem3880YvJTOSrJMwQjwmOskftgEElRsGIDZesjUa2dHGPJD4 A+iHa7HbuWQbueZS/CjEZ69sTpQgdMiJ5mN4S9crNBUyJ0s9gpTs8/c8gatpc0Ydat/e rMTMUT68dtf5PDNkbZ+muWfLmoYZvuYiVNLm4tix1AaYYNhNefhaptY/C39VbDMpOIhX KbuA== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWaOTw0LwiEWFKn04aylWM6/vCoaAKO5WXpWQQEWNqDRpUs2Tq8S Ihzm19gSYfFfB55nh19aA6zgduCESoZTNn/aSn/2yq/62II= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/U96GbqivZfZj8SRLagMPJe0YmGDcxqdWlXJKScdnWeKn/4qUgPDJzwpO1B3Z/OV2uoX4oAkGdWRA7SbeenZ4Y= X-Received: by 2002:a50:f5f4:: with SMTP id x49mr39876965edm.26.1546429584079; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 03:46:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Andy Talbot Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 11:45:59 +0000 Message-ID: To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" , rsgb-lf-group@groups.io X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: I've lost track of the emails, and BS has no archive so: What frequencies have people been using for the JT9-Slow tests. And are these now sort of de-facto fixed? I'll be coding up a PIC / GPS / DDS combination for a JT9-Slow modes beacon test source soon. Freq shift / baud settings based on an early WSJT-X Ver 1 document found on Joe's site. http://physics.pri [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:52a listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (andy.g4jnt[at]gmail.com) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 896f9ee4f10c5db37812c155e804756d Subject: LF: Frequencies for JT9-Slow Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000078136057e783283" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --000000000000078136057e783283 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I've lost track of the emails, and BS has no archive so: What frequencies have people been using for the JT9-Slow tests. And are these now sort of de-facto fixed? I'll be coding up a PIC / GPS / DDS combination for a JT9-Slow modes beacon test source soon. Freq shift / baud settings based on an early WSJT-X Ver 1 document found on Joe's site. http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/WSJT-X_Users_Guide.pdf page 21 viz. shift / baud rates of : -1 12k / 6912 -2 12k / 15360 -5 12k / 40960 -10 12k / 82944 a -30 version is also shown there as 12k / 252000 Andy www.g4jnt.com --000000000000078136057e783283 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I've lost track of the emai= ls, and BS has no archive so:

What frequ= encies have people been using for the JT9-Slow tests.=C2=A0 And are these n= ow sort of de-facto fixed?

I'll be c= oding up a PIC / GPS / DDS combination for a JT9-Slow modes beacon test sou= rce soon.=C2=A0 =C2=A0Freq shift / baud settings based on an early WSJT-X V= er 1 document found on Joe's site.=C2=A0
http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/= K1JT/WSJT-X_Users_Guide.pdf=C2=A0 =C2=A0 page 21
=C2=A0viz. shift / baud rates of :

= -1=C2=A0 =C2=A012k / 6912=C2=A0=C2=A0
-2=C2=A0 =C2=A012k / 1= 5360
-5=C2=A0 =C2=A012k / 40960
-10 12k / 829= 44
=C2=A0
a -30 version is also shown there= =C2=A0 as 12k / 252000


--000000000000078136057e783283--