Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x0PLEOTW032057 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 22:14:30 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gn8kn-0007m5-PQ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 21:11:09 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gn8kl-0007lo-E8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 21:11:07 +0000 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gn8ki-00023a-QJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 21:11:06 +0000 Received: from Clemens0811 ([79.223.10.168]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MFu0Y-1h0q811hZO-00Et5K for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 22:11:03 +0100 From: "Clemens Paul" To: References: <1UTCTNxG9H.5T3bfQF3xD0@optiplex980-pc> <9C9C8088-AD45-4DDF-BD7E-66D13F0D835C@md.metrocast.net> ,<5C4B1BD5.6010404@posteo.de> <1548429783635.69862@kuleuven.be> <5C4B4F2A.6000201@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: <5C4B4F2A.6000201@posteo.de> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 22:11:02 +0100 Message-ID: <8C68A19AD4BE4965A9A370DBAFC944A8@Clemens0811> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AdS02IPuoQ1HTU9fRUeilB38ZXcTFQAF3hSw X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:ZhinTMYfaqeJxDgRAW0iQtAvaL10AyBsh0J9k4aWseIZCgyr7sr 1YGzdHdRfO+mNz43nOEoXQa/9f4KFJecnfH/OotecMTUDRapceX+DRYrou+Nqy86x0YBg79 qPzl+z7vx2PRb2MHt1qcLLdX/eC6M0M0ulAfY0ev9QzPesfZkqtHqFgWSIERxwMZ1eiFtcu 7IkPLp0z8D0y/XWjS8Fqg== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:vQk4Mo9b3HA=:T/HfIX5qoMPfcmTOMPNTaC uwBDQtKpihqxTMLqVMrxPoANJ4wVJ4836eNaZEcbaKT6Gd8IChXAvkgwWwMyD+Hia8b43ZkPm 8iRivyzQyjVYPBXC7qQF/eYH/DSQ93DI9BpFJt4Fs/0Yx8CB13buBEp6GggCPvjevKHqkv28u Sz+L0R6qSfkxqTRjMpgipX2HGObJRVwuiEAngXztjm40Q1MMiUN9vkZApSarJAhw1E5H57j/k 8zUvwFJ5lwguAvAnVn2vt4nSGpJcavWwSRPlh8/XpyxDhr/u5mY68us/1ZujSr/bemvPKIor0 Edd4NH+aw/zIHYK3qfIQLjwrWN+S6PvU4fHsvB1Bzpip5P9Iu40h8s52++x/c65Fujl+Rs0Wl B6uS+uEcSAi9Y3l/wo3k0rc47UQPZhbr2EC83l3NK9fvBFZorV+VvvhOgkLEYNN1Mhhvkr02n q5jwaBf8NSInuaNvROLsPP0OF8SxDvTdGFSmbw6UD1NyXHJ7F+rmAo+ivWlCRW2wQ4EP7/E2c 7dPeOT1D39I/zrxHgtaQ1jRhao7AnMwmwkSVGb5B6rK1T4lhjBo7VR5C9WcO5+NUxkWd7p2SO WczyP6IMdyhEiOWfTpfIRlH/rLr20t1W1/2Gs/+CmJr3eIyGF0HAWmzdBaENIaj8GBPFwh8Dn +3CVEskzrVw0hPnlbU7tde/GExjdmNfGCpcR1L9UxsSdJ1phZ+FgM3+MHEHSYRoNtVluRolLs pu4LiRo2H+RSLInMnfXlSIgMbrT6fnjfsu5HhEERQOSw3Gmz40S+1PwuzSg7Gy6w0qOAGly9m Ugf+/mdxoJGfcxBvXC1t948d90V21VpqrhguN3o7ENu21MIoLVgE4Iw23cnrFrEixdKBYhS7D G7UBHVCMkDZqRdD94A6lADKtv6Y3NNP/c1xg8OdPWHBKqa5GEC2W9F84q+nVL2 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, it would be interesting if you could measure the upper and lower frequency where the antenna current drops by 3dB, Then the efficiency of the loop including the influence of its environment could be c [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.17.22 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.17.22 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (cpaul[at]gmx.net) X-Scan-Signature: b4085bc26841e34d79a2f3beb8f287b1 Subject: RE: LF: Re: TXing WSPR/MF on an indoor loop Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id x0PLEOTW032057 Hi Stefan, it would be interesting if you could measure the upper and lower frequency where the antenna current drops by 3dB, Then the efficiency of the loop including the influence of its environment could be calculated. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of DK7FC >Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 7:02 PM >To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >Subject: Re: LF: Re: TXing WSPR/MF on an indoor loop > >Hello Rik, > >Thanks for your calculations. Looks like the 1000 km distance >is already >done. >Of course i also matched the loop. It uses a small blue ferrite core >with just 20mm diameter. The big RF litz (DECCA litz with 729 strands >(3*3*3*3*3*3) passes just one time through the core, and then >9 turns on >the primary side, so this is much closer to 50 Ohm ;-) >I can measure the antenna current on the primary side, 1.6 A. >So it must >be 9 times higher in the loop... > >73, Stefan > >Am 25.01.2019 16:23, schrieb Rik Strobbe: >> Hi Stefan, >> >> the radiation resistance of a small loop: Ra = >(320*Pi^4*A^2)/lambda^4 where A is the loop area in m^2 >> So for lambda = 630 m and A = 4 m^2 the radiation >restistance Ra = 3.17 µOhm (micro Ohm). >> At least in theory, an indoor antenna will probably have >some extra losses. >> The gain of a small loop is -0.39dBd = 0.9 >> >> So the theoretical ERP = 0.9*14^2*3.17e-6 = 0.56 mW = -32.5dBW >> >> Will I be able to copy you? >> Your regular 1W ERP signal is often up to +15dB here in >WSPR, so the 0.56 mW should peak 15-32= -17dB. That's a solid >copy in WSPR! >> Even with 10dB additional loss I should be able to copy you. >> >> Did you just resonate the loop or also matched it? >> Based on 40W RF power (50W DC at 80% efficiency) and 14A >antenna current the antenna impedance is only 0.2 Ohm. That >would result in a VSWR of 250 (!) for 50 Ohm TX output impedance. >> >> 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T >> >> PS= I hope you have a wooden bed (and bedsprings) >> >> ________________________________________ >> Van: >owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org namens DK7FC >> Verzonden: vrijdag 25 januari 2019 15:23 >> Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Onderwerp: LF: TXing WSPR/MF on an indoor loop >> >> Hi MF, >> >> A few days ago i took some RF litz wire and built a loop that is now >> hanging on the wall inside my home, just 1m besides the bed >:-) (no XYL >> here spoiling the fun). The loop is beaming to about 150/330 deg. >> >> After playing some days on 160m (an unusual high frequency, >witch feels >> very strange. And the band is full of unknown callsigns!!) i did now >> move down to more or less low frequencies, the 630m band! >> >> About 10 nF is needed to series resonate the loop. It has >about 2m x 2m >> of size. The antenna current is not stable because the WIMA FKP-1 >> capacitor becomes warm during the 2 minute WSPR sequence. But the >> maximum current in the loop is 14 A. That explains why the >cap becomes >> warm. A small parallel variable capacitor tunes to resonance. It is >> tuned so that the upheating capacitor runs into the >resonance point in >> the middle of the WSPR sequence, then it runs out of the resonance by >> upheating further. It can cool down during the following >quiet periods.. >> >> 14A into a 4 square meter loop at 475.7 kHz, how much ERP is >that? The >> PA consumes about 3.5 A at 13.8V, i.e. about 50 W. >> >> The system will run over the weekend, even during daylight. >The signal >> generator is a Raspi which will have no internet >connectivity from now >> on, so let's hope the time offset stays inside the accepted range for >> this experiment. >> >> What will the best distance be? So far the band is closed but i'm >> optimistic to crack the 1000 km distance with this QRP setup. >> >> 73, Stefan >> >> >> > > >--- >Diese E-Mail wurde von AVG auf Viren geprüft. >http://www.avg.com >