Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x0GJmBsm004654 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:48:12 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gjqz2-0002Go-1N for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 19:36:16 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gjqyu-0002Gf-Ki for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 19:36:08 +0000 Received: from mout1.freenet.de ([2001:748:100:40::2:3]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gjqys-0004Fo-EP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 19:36:07 +0000 Received: from [195.4.92.163] (helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mout1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.90_1 #2) id 1gjqyn-0000L2-Tg for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:36:01 +0100 Received: from [::1] (port=55844 helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.90_1 #2) id 1gjqyn-000366-Sx for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:36:01 +0100 Received: from sub4.freenet.de ([195.4.92.123]:50998) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.90_1 #2) id 1gjqwj-0001Im-BV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:33:53 +0100 Received: from dslb-088-071-255-169.088.071.pools.vodafone-ip.de ([88.71.255.169]:53374 helo=[192.168.178.26]) by sub4.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256) (port 587) (Exim 4.90_1 #2) id 1gjqwj-0003Qu-6v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:33:53 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1762043626.20190104174530@gmail.com> <9554861547246900@iva5-750e13568e4d.qloud-c.yandex.net> <1075632463.27315210.1547312330961@mail.yahoo.com> <33640135.9OHUBihQns@x220> <74d0df18-0c23-3651-1c19-16a45495e0c2@freenet.de> <02e001d4ac4e$303c6d00$90b54700$@comcast.net> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Wolfgang_B=c3=bcscher?= Message-ID: <843a3208-0feb-8f00-7f9c-224ac18eba33@freenet.de> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:33:50 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <02e001d4ac4e$303c6d00$90b54700$@comcast.net> Content-Language: en-US X-Originated-At: 88.71.255.169!53374 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello Jim, Of course the "20 meter long tube" wasn't a serious suggestion. I wouldn't "seriously" transmit there anyway, and you are right, it will not "radiate" more than a few femto-femtowatts (not sure what t [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [2001:748:100:40:0:0:2:3 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dl4yhf[at]freenet.de) X-Scan-Signature: 138e3b341e0543401afa7e97ee054540 Subject: Re: ***SPAM***Re: VLF: GOTA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello Jim, Of course the "20 meter long tube" wasn't a serious suggestion. I wouldn't "seriously" transmit there anyway, and you are right, it will not "radiate" more than a few femto-femtowatts (not sure what the proper tech prefix would be). The larger / longer the structure, the better (I think) and if you manage to place such a beast between two skyscrapers with massive steel construction (so the mag field has something to couple into), the signal may even be detectable a bit further way. Similar like yourself, I have tied a couple of bar magnets to an electric motor (from a cassette tape deck, with mechanic RPM stabilisation built inside) and was pleased to detect it over 50 meters away. But not good enough for a ground-penetrating 'beacon system' for caving, which was one of my hobbies in days long gone by. If we'd compare this with a ferrite bar antenna, length (of the magnet or bar) would be more important than thickness. 73,   Wolf DL4YHF . On 14.01.2019 22:14, hvanesce@comcast.net wrote: > Hello Wolf, > > If I am treading on anyone's intellectual property please advise. > Years ago I built a version of what you mentioned, and I don't operate it > often because of fear of kinetic effects :-) > The stack of 3" diameter 1.5" thick magnets is epoxy encapsulated and > rotates at 20 Hz inside of an enclosure with three 1/2" thick cabinet-grade > plywood walls on all six sides of the enclosure. It is designed for several > orders of magnitude safety margin against kinetic effects. > It's lots of fun but I wouldn’t recommend it to anyone without access to > lots of sandbags. > > I have a question: > I did not strive for a high aspect ratio (I did not strive for a tube that > is long compared to diameter) on the basis that at 1 Hz to 20 Hz the far > field is irrelevant to most of us, and in the near field, only the volume of > a good neodymium magnet matters: > > B = (B_of_magnet x volume_of_magnet)/(2 x pi x r^3) > > Does this seem right? Size matters but length doesn't? > > On a related topic, I don't want to contradict your thought below, but I > don't think that a 1.6 Hz transmitter that has the range of an ELF > guard-rail transmitter would be made with magnets; because: > To have such a range, a 1.6 Hz experimenter would technically need to file > for human-subjects authorization unless the magnetic device was operated in > the wilderness, but we read in this thread that the 1.6 Hz device is safe > and convenient to use. > > 73, > > Jim AA5BW > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Büscher > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2019 5:58 AM > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: ***SPAM***Re: VLF: GOTA > > Claudio - just wait until that b.s.-meter pulsates 1.6 times per second :o) > > 20 meter long tube filled with neodym power magnets, rotating at 96 RPM... > but now we'll never get to know this top-secret technology. Harr harr. > > On 13.01.2019 10:59, Claudio Pozzi wrote: > ... > > >