Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x0OHHAXL024952 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 18:17:18 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gmiWD-0002Rj-S9 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:10:21 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gmiWD-0002Ra-61 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:10:21 +0000 Received: from proofpoint-cluster.metrocast.net ([65.175.128.136]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gmiWA-0007Kf-V0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:10:20 +0000 Received: from [192.168.2.9] (d-69-161-84-15.cpe.metrocast.net [69.161.84.15]) (authenticated bits=0) by huckleberry.metrocast.net (8.14.7/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x0OHAFhe036620 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:10:15 GMT From: Rob Renoud Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 12:10:15 -0500 Message-Id: <5D357392-08EC-4FC6-B14C-3669F05DCB2D@md.metrocast.net> References: <1UTCSIDCaF.1ZaNrHmL5ZJ@optiplex980-pc> In-Reply-To: <1UTCSIDCaF.1ZaNrHmL5ZJ@optiplex980-pc> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Mailer: iPad Mail (16C50) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.22.28,1.0.8,0.0.0000 definitions=2019-01-24_10:2019-01-23,2019-01-24,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1810110000 definitions=main-1901240120 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Riccardo, As with Jay, no decodes last night likely due to extremely night noise levels here too (+10 to +20 dB over S9). Believe I did capture your carrier on the SL Spectrum Display from 2230 - 2300 UTC just [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [65.175.128.136 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 2e2f7cbbe9f38dd7bf3fac4fc012e6fc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: LF: EbNaut tonite X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id x0OHHAXL024952 Riccardo, As with Jay, no decodes last night likely due to extremely night noise levels here too (+10 to +20 dB over S9). Believe I did capture your carrier on the SL Spectrum Display from 2230 - 2300 UTC just prior to the high noise levels taking over the band. The displayed carrier, that could be your signal, was observed at 137544.975 Hz on the two RX systems I ran last night. Does that correspond to your primary frequency source? 73, Rob - K3RWR > On Jan 24, 2019, at 06:10, "jrusgrove@comcast.net" wrote: > > Riccardo > > Unfortunately there were no decodes last night. QRN levels were quite high due to a large storm in the Gulf of Mexico. > > Jay W1VD