Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x0QD2bXl003874 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 14:02:45 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gnNWr-0000XR-7Z for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 12:57:45 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gnNWj-0000XI-Jg for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 12:57:37 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gnNWh-0003k4-IN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 12:57:36 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 189C816005E for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 13:57:31 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1548507452; bh=EoUMWmzHrybci1CpehFFCro5BEaOt6WG4CV0UCyrpjQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=YLmHjfgg3mBLq0QTdMlfd/eU0lG33Gj14EzPIShNkCMbDKOq2/httFHP5Ls2BOzTo 8wVFMJmUJdRJKENrIWb47Hdj0RSn113hxFXfr669Olq9BavmGS8zramg/ArpzQjdnc x7LUqEbZMXNKvBmWGGjZm0yo5Z45NcXmRSKR+xfnTRCML4oZzVl2lNEBEBzbYCHjRu 8RtZtEICAnhw9IQRglCH6WNKGkIDyqwpSN7NNq5CMtPc1gOlW1RLopkzd8x1IYZmwL q2piLdINWs6vjlyFpVQBNbAwsVnMfCnGRgK8B9XT6RqBHO0z3P/rCTQKy8tQmhgwEL Je3q3FVwXLJ1g== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 43mwsR44nQz6tmB for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 13:57:31 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5C4C593B.8090406@posteo.de> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 13:57:31 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <168892287d0.marcocadeddu@tin.it> <5C4C4469.1050006@posteo.de> <1da1d3ae-06a2-04ba-fc91-f2c09cd9645a@n1bug.com> In-Reply-To: <1da1d3ae-06a2-04ba-fc91-f2c09cd9645a@n1bug.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Paul, Oh yes, you are right, i forgot that. In the same way they could limit the maximum current at a given frequency and capacity... But this is probably to keep a certain life time and guarantee a certain [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 33d261536bb1467bb13d5764461d5ec4 Subject: Re: R: LF: TXing WSPR/MF on an indoor loop Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Paul, Oh yes, you are right, i forgot that. In the same way they could limit the maximum current at a given frequency and capacity... But this is probably to keep a certain life time and guarantee a certain deviation of the nominal capacity, for commercial applications... I'm just thinking about a multi-turn TX loop that uses no capacitor at all. Imagine a loop with say 15 turns of the same wire i am using now. It will have 45 Ohm then? Now one turn results in 0.2 Ohm. When touching the capaciors during the transmission, i notice they heat up by 15 °C maybe, not to much. So i estimate the losses are about 2 W, i.e. most of the losses are in the wire. A loop of 15 turns will have an internal capacity and a self resonance frequency. Maybe it can be tuned to 475 kHz, then you can close the loop without a serial C! and inject a RF current with a ferrite core just like i do now. The residual impedance will have no reactive component. And then, the limiting factor will be the maximum temperature of the wire and its mechanical expansion when it becomes warm, which will detune the loop like the upheating capacitor does. But that time constant will be higher, so you tune it out for a given average power when TXing WSPR. 73, Stefan Am 26.01.2019 13:02, schrieb N1BUG: > Hi Stefan, > > Congrats on your results with the small indoor loop! > > >> The limiting factor in that system is the capacitor! I use 2.2 nF +6.8 >> nF + 1090 pF variable C. Maybe it can be optimised by using 10 x 1 nF >> WIMA-FKP-1-2000. The voltage is about 450 V, which is well below the 700 >> V limit. >> > You may want to take a close look into the WIMA data sheet. There > are charts showing maximum permitted Vrms vs. frequency. I think you > may find the 1 nF 2000VDC / 700VAC FKP is derated to around 300 Vrms > at 475 kHz. I had some experience destroying these things... :-) > > 73, > Paul > >