Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x0PItkp3031359 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 19:55:47 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gn6ZZ-0007X2-9Y for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 18:51:25 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gn6Z9-0007Wt-CU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 18:50:59 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gn6Z6-0001of-C4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 18:50:57 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 799A8240105 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 19:50:55 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1548442255; bh=vpNbophxQBec8W3ct5ARbLEJiihGO5GI0nJacrZV4qQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=fckNGOyQiMjo9OI12IiSkbIQqXxnpTyVHpL2wFA1PNT2uT2Rhbk9iRk8CFZHNOhtd y424BUBd0NTderL0bDkzxPloZm0Pi1bnlDsKnOYX1Q5rbPxlSwE/+msAOCJczQ3k8Z Wxzm/w56BDii/k1I18CeXURxZUy/ZsnNPFHU3j9Ur6KNySZNylV6X0ly/a6mB1ZnBJ 7jRMA6z4LeVJ7psRpyOwhdefRAZXmnGDa5uQHEp5vDZBrZVsahtc/anSv+Nf6xUg1g jV1NaBCTvv2hQSIKMqU3olhBEFlH8ELwfU5L61o3/vSeG91VyOYnyy+bW6Q3bmxLGP oeXzTixQSUZsg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 43mSlf6RRXz9rxN for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 19:50:54 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5C4B5A8E.2000804@posteo.de> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 19:50:54 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1UTCTNxG9H.5T3bfQF3xD0@optiplex980-pc> <9C9C8088-AD45-4DDF-BD7E-66D13F0D835C@md.metrocast.net> ,<5C4B1BD5.6010404@posteo.de> <1548429783635.69862@kuleuven.be>,<5C4B4F2A.6000201@posteo.de> <1548440122358.46919@kuleuven.be> In-Reply-To: <1548440122358.46919@kuleuven.be> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Rik, I am using a single turn loop. Just the primary winding of the matching transformer has 9 turns. So the impedance is 81 times higher than the loss resistance of the loop. 73, Stefan Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.66 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 21e2055b299bd63ed331c37c8a3e15ca Subject: Re: LF: Re: TXing WSPR/MF on an indoor loop Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Rik, I am using a single turn loop. Just the primary winding of the matching transformer has 9 turns. So the impedance is 81 times higher than the loss resistance of the loop. 73, Stefan Am 25.01.2019 19:15, schrieb Rik Strobbe: > Hello Stefan, > > my calculations assume that you are using a single turn loop. > > 73, Rik ON7YD > > > ________________________________________ > Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org namens DK7FC > Verzonden: vrijdag 25 januari 2019 19:02 > Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Onderwerp: Re: LF: Re: TXing WSPR/MF on an indoor loop > > Hello Rik, > > Thanks for your calculations. Looks like the 1000 km distance is already > done. > Of course i also matched the loop. It uses a small blue ferrite core > with just 20mm diameter. The big RF litz (DECCA litz with 729 strands > (3*3*3*3*3*3) passes just one time through the core, and then 9 turns on > the primary side, so this is much closer to 50 Ohm ;-) > I can measure the antenna current on the primary side, 1.6 A. So it must > be 9 times higher in the loop... > > 73, Stefan > > Am 25.01.2019 16:23, schrieb Rik Strobbe: > >> Hi Stefan, >> >> the radiation resistance of a small loop: Ra = (320*Pi^4*A^2)/lambda^4 where A is the loop area in m^2 >> So for lambda = 630 m and A = 4 m^2 the radiation restistance Ra = 3.17 ľOhm (micro Ohm). >> At least in theory, an indoor antenna will probably have some extra losses. >> The gain of a small loop is -0.39dBd = 0.9 >> >> So the theoretical ERP = 0.9*14^2*3.17e-6 = 0.56 mW = -32.5dBW >> >> Will I be able to copy you? >> Your regular 1W ERP signal is often up to +15dB here in WSPR, so the 0.56 mW should peak 15-32= -17dB. That's a solid copy in WSPR! >> Even with 10dB additional loss I should be able to copy you. >> >> Did you just resonate the loop or also matched it? >> Based on 40W RF power (50W DC at 80% efficiency) and 14A antenna current the antenna impedance is only 0.2 Ohm. That would result in a VSWR of 250 (!) for 50 Ohm TX output impedance. >> >> 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T >> >> PS= I hope you have a wooden bed (and bedsprings) >> >> ________________________________________ >> Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org namens DK7FC >> Verzonden: vrijdag 25 januari 2019 15:23 >> Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Onderwerp: LF: TXing WSPR/MF on an indoor loop >> >> Hi MF, >> >> A few days ago i took some RF litz wire and built a loop that is now >> hanging on the wall inside my home, just 1m besides the bed :-) (no XYL >> here spoiling the fun). The loop is beaming to about 150/330 deg. >> >> After playing some days on 160m (an unusual high frequency, witch feels >> very strange. And the band is full of unknown callsigns!!) i did now >> move down to more or less low frequencies, the 630m band! >> >> About 10 nF is needed to series resonate the loop. It has about 2m x 2m >> of size. The antenna current is not stable because the WIMA FKP-1 >> capacitor becomes warm during the 2 minute WSPR sequence. But the >> maximum current in the loop is 14 A. That explains why the cap becomes >> warm. A small parallel variable capacitor tunes to resonance. It is >> tuned so that the upheating capacitor runs into the resonance point in >> the middle of the WSPR sequence, then it runs out of the resonance by >> upheating further. It can cool down during the following quiet periods.. >> >> 14A into a 4 square meter loop at 475.7 kHz, how much ERP is that? The >> PA consumes about 3.5 A at 13.8V, i.e. about 50 W. >> >> The system will run over the weekend, even during daylight. The signal >> generator is a Raspi which will have no internet connectivity from now >> on, so let's hope the time offset stays inside the accepted range for >> this experiment. >> >> What will the best distance be? So far the band is closed but i'm >> optimistic to crack the 1000 km distance with this QRP setup. >> >> 73, Stefan >> >> >> >> > >