Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x0CDUxmU008672 for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 14:31:05 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1giJJW-000457-ET for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 13:27:02 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1giJJW-00044y-5L for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 13:27:02 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1giJJT-0000sR-EQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 13:27:01 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DD512400FB for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 14:26:55 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1547299617; bh=tCSodtdHKAqZnBQmTpoCMogRYFZu+MgjrZ8tkFvQ/3Q=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=djY+9TmiJxeIC1MISQbOhp0pywuveQJi9LiFrD/8eM47YYpRJcWW862Jcf/DfSne3 tlOYfNEPqZgxYfh6ta9SA9Z/lN+H0ulvMVqqHiIotkh3PG09qmxMHxRVURKKIjqeeS diUi/Ahxv1DvmJlyjqYAyPkqY27sx2oRuA14f3KvV19ref3TTCME9MBjLCDIegjHOk flll+RMombSpvwGcjT6vMhw9gU5n0Hsa+GMWycyH/gthJwtkPPNwRBeZaEJLEoJkmk ZAChFknTJjyuSBqUQyDU2+QXx3SHNe+THSNVdFtRZufqQ8Na1YCg0C7OqV71yRrv7+ PMXi5wqu43xKA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 43cL9p5656z9rxP for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 14:26:54 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5C39EB1D.5080104@posteo.de> Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 14:26:53 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Dimitris, Interesting. BTW, it's a long time ago that we read from you. You have been VK1SV some years ago, right? I remember your websites and experiments with some long wires laying on the ground. I wish to h [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.66 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: fc152e7304849b9a177649b85aea9f41 Subject: Re: LF: a lot of ferrite Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Dimitris, Interesting. BTW, it's a long time ago that we read from you. You have been VK1SV some years ago, right? I remember your websites and experiments with some long wires laying on the ground. I wish to have such a wide area for experimenting like you have :-) Recently i searched for one of your websies where you described an experiment using 2x 100m of wire, if i remember correctly. But the page was not found. Can you tell me the link, if it is still existing? Well, i see no advantage in a RX antenna when using such rods. Maybe you can build a RX loop antenna a bit more compact but then it will be very heavy and the air gap (changing with temperature and mechanical forces) may affect the phasy stability. For a TX antenna i see no advantage either. An AL value of 1 uH can be reached with most high mu ferrite toroids... However, maybe you could build a H field RX antenna for frequencies below 1 kHz, something like http://www.vlf.it/romero3/ics101.html or http://www.vlf.it/matteobruna/ULF_Induction-Coil.htm 73, Stefan Am 12.01.2019 04:48, schrieb Dimitrios Tsifakis: > Hi LF group, > > I have managed to acquire a few very large ferrite rods (36 cm x 10 cm > x 2 cm). The material is unknown but I managed to form a square > 'toroid' with four of them (they are heavy so gravity was enough to > keep everything in place for a measurement) and I measured about 15 uH > for 4 turns at 0.1 MHz, which if I have done the calculations > correctly implies a relative permeability of about 1000. > > The R of the impedance of the square loop was low (<0.2 ohm) at 0.1 > MHz and it increased fast with frequency (170 ohm at 5 MHz!). > > The question is, what LF/VLF experiment would you do if you had half a > dozen of these rods? > > 73, Dimitris VK2COW > >