Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x0BIZeEO003486 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 19:35:51 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gi1Yd-0000YA-G1 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 18:29:27 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gi1YV-0000Y1-OO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 18:29:19 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gi1YT-0003sr-TN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 18:29:18 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B6032400E5 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 19:29:14 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1547231356; bh=K1d9r+nSEPH86h4QX6cuLstYHoykV+HE+ZXj1pQhX7M=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=Hp5/x1+yc0GYUiTCYwu92zQEsPj/i2CQWOq+gcAYgijOfm1I1AYyJcSmtWQLnemWl b+cWVNs5jNz2vfkpe5eAu0MYwHvVvvkwpy088fVjTbLfhbi+cacFHu9rp/2sH5o0ce FCeo0BfJo1jH96wt0GrHzd0dqjOCGBTg9h33JgpBqXir6kEKBJWDVgKe/bG4Ka34WG ksETxlP8i5EpJIrMaMNV3y6HEaI7baXafqIkV2vm+hAVk4/qPlUpKe8wbhAY8Q+GMB geKORiRc0Zdfvfwik6T3FoK85bJIYmVi2b29x78zVIQBmv3Os6yRoK+XCmwc89LkLb eQ85hsmmbY5vw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 43brx554x6z9rxH for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 19:29:12 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5C38E078.1090805@posteo.de> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 19:29:12 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1541712573053.31739@kuleuven.be> <1542362144885.30626@kuleuven.be> <1542721669174.9290@kuleuven.be> <1542902405876.64977@kuleuven.be> <1544631368092.16214@kuleuven.be> <1544826336986.15705@kuleuven.be> <1545855021519.36262@kuleuven.be> , <1546865627715.6950@kuleuven.be> In-Reply-To: <1546865627715.6950@kuleuven.be> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Rik, LF, Your latest version seems to work well, even here, with VAC included. No crashes so far. The software is running in TX mode at JT9-10 since a few hours, but no PA connected. Also the slower scrolling [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.66 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: a6b6ffaf48fdddf1ed5c25dc4bf03ee1 Subject: Re: LF: SlowJT9 update (v0.9.14.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Rik, LF, Your latest version seems to work well, even here, with VAC included. No crashes so far. The software is running in TX mode at JT9-10 since a few hours, but no PA connected. Also the slower scrolling spectrogram works well. The only remaining problem may be the missing internal upconverter, which, so far, forces all RX stations to leave their standard 'dial' frequency (136.0 kHz or 474.2 kHz) or forces TX stations to transmit on a frequency far below the frequencies used for WSPR and JT9-1. Will someone transmit on LF over the weekend? 73, Stefan Am 07.01.2019 13:53, schrieb Rik Strobbe: > Dear all, > > Beta-release v0.9.14.0 of SlowJT9 has been uploaded, see http://www.472khz.org/SlowJT9/. > > Changes: > -JT9-10 mode added. > - Waterfall speed will adapt to selected JT9 submode. > - Any (reasonable) value can be entered for tone spacing (allowing flexible frequency dividing of the modulated signal). > - Lower frequency limit dropped to 200 Hz (was 400 Hz). > - Option to discard the audio frequency limits added (Settings -> Mode). > In that case the TX boundaries will be 100 - 4980 Hz regardless of the JT9 submode. > The RX boundaries however will still be limited by the resampling process: > JT9-1: 100 - 4980 Hz > JT9-2: 100 - 2240 Hz > JT9-5: 100 - 840 Hz > JT9-10: 100 - 415 Hz > - Non fatal bug fixed that skipped PTT handling in the first TX cycle after 'Halt TX' was pressed. > > Bug reports, remarks and suggestions are welcome. > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T >