Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x0GDj3eb002917 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:45:14 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gjlPD-0001HY-Nl for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:38:55 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gjlNW-0001HN-53 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:37:10 +0000 Received: from smtp1web.tin.it ([212.216.176.195]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gjlNR-0002sj-Pd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:37:07 +0000 Received: from feu5 (10.192.64.15) by smtp1web.tin.it (8.6.060.43) id 5AB0B63D076BE0AD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:37:03 +0100 Received: from (87.12.12.26) by webmailtin.pc.tim.it; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:37:03 +0100 Message-ID: <16856e12994.marcocadeddu@tin.it> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:37:03 +0100 (CET) From: "marcocadeddu@tin.it" To: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: 87.12.12.26:1387 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: ;-) I agree and will support you with the new meaning for LF!! Paul, the new pic is more impressive and shows a big burn... I could send you some pic from my collection ;-) Just an idea for the new version you are planning. As far as I understood the mobile coil [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.216.176.195 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (marcocadeddu[at]tin.it) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: ab7de7439a3fce0b74220375dc6f18e8 Subject: R: RE: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_33095_20357385.1547645823384" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false ------=_Part_33095_20357385.1547645823384 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ;-) I agree and will support you with the new meaning for LF!! Paul, the new pic is more impressive and shows a big burn... I could send you some pic from my collection ;-) Just an idea for the new version you are planning. As far as I understood the mobile coil is part of the loading coil (If I assume wrong discard..) where is it placed? would suggest to place in the bottom part of the coil just to be in the lower voltage environment. Of course when RF want to burn .. it burns! Marco, IK1HSS ----Messaggio originale---- Da: luis@vigilant.es Data: 16-gen-2019 10.25 A: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Ogg: RE: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :) Sorry to see the damages Paul. As Chris said very certainly "LF without smoke is QRP" ;-) I would add that LF stands for "Let's Fire" and a "!" should be added at the end 73 de Luis EA5DOM -----Mensaje original----- De: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] En nombre de N1BUG Enviado el: martes, 15 de enero de 2019 22:56 Para: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Asunto: Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :) Eventually I will rebuild it perfect... although I would prefer to start over with a new coil as this one requires too much maintenance. Right now I don't have the luxury of time for any of that. It's solar minimum and I need this thing working. :) I don't trust the inner coil form for HV now, too much carbon: http://www.n1bug.com/vario-fail-2-1200.jpg So that'll have to get replaced. I will make the connections differently this time! 73, Paul On 1/15/19 10:42 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > Hello N1BUG, > > I too have had issues with bolted connections to the variometer. Not > an expensive fix so long as you don't mind a few battle scars, but > knowing you, you probably want it cosmetically perfect again ;) LF > without smoke is QRP... > > Tuesday, January 15, 2019, 2:50:18 PM, you wrote: > >> Thanks to all who monitored and provided reports on this latest test >> of slow JT9 modes. > >> The test ended suddenly around dawn this morning. Here is the reason: > >> http://www.n1bug.com/vario-fail-1-1200.jpg > >> It's the inner coil from the 2200m loading coil / variometer: > >> http://www.n1bug.com/vario-fail-0-1200.jpg > >> I had hoped to be on looking for QSOs tonight, but obviously that is >> not going to be possible. I do not know when I will be QRV again. > >> I have a very busy day today, so the final report on the JT9 test >> might not be ready until tomorrow. > >> 73, >> Paul N1BUG ------=_Part_33095_20357385.1547645823384 Content-Type: text/html;charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ;-) I agree and will support you with the new meaning for LF!!

Paul,= the new pic is more impressive and shows a big burn... I could send you so= me pic from my collection ;-)
Just an idea for the new version you are p= lanning.
As far as I understood the mobile coil is part of the loading c= oil (If I assume wrong discard..) where is it placed? would suggest to plac= e in the bottom part of the coil just to be in the lower voltage environmen= t.

Of course when RF want to burn .. it burns!

Marco, IK1HSS<= br>
----Messaggio originale----
Da: luis@vigilant.es
Data: 16-gen-2019 10= .25
A: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org"<rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>= ;
Ogg: RE: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :)

Sorry to s= ee the damages Paul. As Chris said very certainly "LF without smoke is QRP"= ;-)

I would add that LF stands for "Let's Fire" and a "!" should be= added at the end

73 de Luis
EA5DOM

-----Mensaje original-= ----
De: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@= blacksheep.org] En nombre de N1BUG
Enviado el: martes, 15 de enero de 20= 19 22:56
Para: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Asunto: Re: LF: JT9-10 vs= JT9-5 test ends with smoke :)

Eventually I will rebuild it perfect.= .. although I would prefer to start over with a new coil as this one requir= es too much maintenance. Right now I don't have the luxury of time for any = of that. It's solar minimum and I need this thing working. :)

I don'= t trust the inner coil form for HV now, too much carbon:

http://www.= n1bug.com/vario-fail-2-1200.jpg

So that'll have to get replaced. I w= ill make the connections differently this time!

73,
Paul

<= br>
On 1/15/19 10:42 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
>
>
> H= ello N1BUG,
>
> I  too  have had issues with bolted = connections to the variometer. Not
> an  expensive  fix&nb= sp; so  long as you don't mind a few battle scars, but
> knowin= g  you,  you  probably  want it cosmetically perfect ag= ain ;) LF
> without smoke is QRP...
>
> Tuesday, Januar= y 15, 2019, 2:50:18 PM, you wrote:
>
>> Thanks to all who m= onitored and provided reports on this latest test
>> of slow JT9 = modes.
>
>> The test ended suddenly around dawn this mornin= g. Here is the reason:
>
>> http://www.n1bug.com/vario-fail= -1-1200.jpg
>
>> It's the inner coil from the 2200m loading= coil / variometer:
>
>> http://www.n1bug.com/vario-fail-0-= 1200.jpg
>
>> I had hoped to be on looking for QSOs tonight= , but obviously that is
>> not going to be possible. I do not kno= w when I will be QRV again.
>
>> I have a very busy day tod= ay, so the final report on the JT9 test
>> might not be ready unt= il tomorrow.
>
>> 73,
>> Paul N1BUG


------=_Part_33095_20357385.1547645823384--