Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x09GGoEQ021296 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 17:17:01 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ghGLk-0004I0-3k for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 16:05:00 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ghGLe-0004Hr-Rg for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 16:04:54 +0000 Received: from smtp2web.tin.it ([212.216.176.236]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1ghGLb-0007XP-NV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 16:04:53 +0000 Received: from feu21 (10.192.64.31) by smtp2web.tin.it (8.6.060.43) id 5B27C17304ECABCE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 17:04:47 +0100 Received: from (93.146.209.118) by webmailtin.pc.tim.it; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 17:04:47 +0100 Message-ID: <168335be8c8.marcocadeddu@tin.it> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 17:04:47 +0100 (CET) From: "marcocadeddu@tin.it" To: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: 93.146.209.118:51900 X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Chris, my 2 cents opinion: don't worry be happy :-)most part of commercial rigs have a frequency readout with 10Hz resolution and the listed frequencies are within ±1 digit73, Marco IK1HSS ----Messaggio originale---- Da: 9-gen-2019 13.49 A: "RSGG_LF" Ogg: LF: Another frequency stability question Content analysis details: (1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.216.176.236 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (marcocadeddu[at]tin.it) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO Reply-To/From or Reply-To/body contain different freemails X-Scan-Signature: b42857a5fad6e32377447282c21f62b1 Subject: R: LF: Another frequency stability question Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_614_20141996.1547049887948" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false ------=_Part_614_20141996.1547049887948 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Chris, my 2 cents opinion: don't worry be happy :-)most part of commercial rigs ha= ve a frequency readout with 10Hz resolution and the listed frequencies are = within =C2=B11 digit73, Marco IK1HSS ----Messaggio originale---- Da: dead.fets@gmail.com Data: 9-gen-2019 13.49 A: "RSGG_LF" Ogg: LF: Another frequency stability question Hello RSGG_LF, I have been active on 160m for a spell and am seeing lots of excellent spots of my signals using WSPR2 but with very disparate frequencies cited. is it me, or are some people not giving accurate frequency reports? How can I tell? same TS-590S shows very stable reports on LF. I am TX'ing ostensibly with 1550 audio. As the GPS locked LO in the 590 has failed it's on its stock none TCXO, but on LF reports are fine. Small example: Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter = RGrid km az 2019-01-09 12:38 2E0ILY 1.838152 -19 0 IO= 82qv 1 TF3GZ HP75rm 1858 327=20 2019-01-09 12:38 2E0ILY 1.838152 -1 0 IO= 82qv 1 GM4OAS IO76cx 497 337=20 2019-01-09 12:38 2E0ILY 1.838152 -16 0 IO= 82qv 1 SWUKSDR/3 IO70jb 362 211=20 2019-01-09 12:38 2E0ILY 1.838163 -10 0 IO= 82qv 1 G3JKV IO91uf 244 138=20 2019-01-09 12:38 2E0ILY 1.838152 -25 0 IO= 82qv 1 M0TAZ JO01cn 243 126=20 2019-01-09 12:38 2E0ILY 1.838155 -11 0 IO= 82qv 1 G4MSA IO90au 232 168=20 2019-01-09 12:38 2E0ILY 1.838148 -18 0 IO= 82qv 1 G8AOE IO94im 201 25=20 2019-01-09 12:38 2E0ILY 1.838157 -3 0 IO= 82qv 1 G4BOO IO91ij 190 151=20 2019-01-09 12:38 2E0ILY 1.838143 -7 0 IO= 82qv 1 M0ORH IO93ts 178 56=20 2019-01-09 12:38 2E0ILY 1.838152 -10 0 IO= 82qv 1 G0LUJ IO83ls 101 344=20 2019-01-09 12:38 2E0ILY 1.838152 -6 0 IO= 82qv 1 M0VSE IO92jp 99 106 Thanks. --=20 Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com ------=_Part_614_20141996.1547049887948 Content-Type: text/html;charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Chris,

my 2 cents opinion: don't worry be = happy :-)
most part of commercial rigs have a frequency readout w= ith 10Hz resolution and the listed frequencies are within =C2=B11 digit
73, Marco IK1HSS

----Messaggio originale----
Da: dead.fets@gmail.com
Data: 9-gen-2019 = 13.49
A: "RSGG_LF"<rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Ogg: LF: Anoth= er frequency stability question



Hello  RSGG_LF,

=   I  have  been  active  on  160m  for&n= bsp; a  spell  and am seeing lots of
  excellent  sp= ots  of  my signals using WSPR2 but with very disparate
 = frequencies  cited. is it me, or are some people not giving accurate<= br>  frequency  reports?  How  can I tell? same TS-590S= shows very stable
  reports  on  LF.  I am TX'ing o= stensibly with 1550 audio. As the GPS
  locked LO in the 590 has fa= iled it's on its stock none TCXO, but on
  LF reports are fine. Sma= ll example:


  Timestamp      = Call    MHz     SNR   &n= bsp; Drift   Grid    Pwr     R= eporter        RGrid   km = ;     az
2019-01-09 12:38    &n= bsp;   2E0ILY        &nbs= p; 1.838152        -19   =   0       IO82qv    =       1       TF3GZ&= nbsp;  HP75rm          18= 58    327
2019-01-09 12:38     = ;   2E0ILY          = 1.838152        -1   &nbs= p;  0       IO82qv   &nbs= p;      1       GM4O= AS          IO76cx  =         497     337 =
2019-01-09 12:38        2E0ILY = ;         1.838152   = ;     -16     0   &n= bsp;   IO82qv        &nbs= p; 1       SWUKSDR/3    &= nbsp;  IO70jb          36= 2     211
2019-01-09 12:38    =     2E0ILY        &n= bsp; 1.838163        -10  &nbs= p;  0       IO82qv   &nbs= p;      1       G3JK= V   IO91uf          = 244     138
2019-01-09 12:38   &nbs= p;    2E0ILY        =   1.838152        -25  &n= bsp;  0       IO82qv   &n= bsp;      1       M0= TAZ   JO01cn         = ; 243     126
2019-01-09 12:38   &n= bsp;    2E0ILY       &nbs= p;  1.838155        -11  =    0       IO82qv   =        1       = G4MSA   IO90au        &nb= sp; 232     168
2019-01-09 12:38   =      2E0ILY       &n= bsp;  1.838148        -18 &nbs= p;   0       IO82qv  &nbs= p;       1      = ; G8AOE   IO94im        &= nbsp; 201     25
2019-01-09 12:38   = ;     2E0ILY       &= nbsp;  1.838157        -3 &nbs= p;    0       IO82qv &nbs= p;        1     = ;  G4BOO   IO91ij       &= nbsp;  190     151
2019-01-09 12:38 &nbs= p;      2E0ILY      =     1.838143        -7&nb= sp;     0       IO82qv&nb= sp;         1   &nbs= p;   M0ORH   IO93ts      =     178     56
2019-01-09 12:38&nbs= p;       2E0ILY     =      1.838152       = -10     0       IO82qv&n= bsp;         1   &nb= sp;   G0LUJ   IO83ls      = ;    101     344
2019-01-09 12:38&n= bsp;       2E0ILY    &nbs= p;     1.838152      &nbs= p; -6      0       I= O82qv          1  &n= bsp;    M0VSE   IO92jp    &nbs= p;     99      106

&nbs= p; Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Chris     &= nbsp;           &nbs= p;        mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com
=



------=_Part_614_20141996.1547049887948--