Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x0EDPEdW022456 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 14:25:20 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gj2B7-0002uS-92 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 13:21:21 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gj2B6-0002uJ-LC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 13:21:20 +0000 Received: from rhcavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([2a02:2c40:0:c0::25:130]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gj2B4-0006MR-Vx for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 13:21:19 +0000 X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@kuleuven.be X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-ID: 47F7712035A.A2CD9 X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Received: from icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (icts-p-smtps-1e.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.33]) by rhcavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F7712035A for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 14:21:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX24.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-exmbx24.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.11.59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CE9840B6; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 14:21:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.62) by ICTS-S-EXMBX24.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.59) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 14:21:04 +0100 Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::291a:cc4f:6953:698a]) by ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::291a:cc4f:6953:698a%25]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 14:21:04 +0100 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: Michel F5WK , "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" , "rsgb-lf-group@groups.io" Thread-Topic: [rsgb-lf-group] LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test Thread-Index: AQHUq+/veYFmhr6ankqffxbGHEJVHKWuqA6AgAAX4rI= Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 13:21:03 +0000 Message-ID: <1547472063517.68590@kuleuven.be> References: <7c1d6628-d950-9548-995c-9ebc6039bfed@n1bug.com> <16910352864.20190114105943@mterrier.net>, In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-GB, en-US Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.112.50.1] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: And be sure to use version 0.9.14, older versions will not decode below 400Hz. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Van: rsgb-lf-group@groups.io namens N1BUG Verzonden: maandag 14 januari 2019 13:54 Aan: Michel F5WK; rsgb_lf_group@b [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [2a02:2c40:0:c0:0:0:25:130 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: 77d68ebd44814a6def4d7158b7296e78 Subject: Re: [rsgb-lf-group] LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.0 required=5.0 tests=SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id x0EDPEdW022456 And be sure to use version 0.9.14, older versions will not decode below 400Hz. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T ________________________________________ Van: rsgb-lf-group@groups.io namens N1BUG Verzonden: maandag 14 januari 2019 13:54 Aan: Michel F5WK; rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; rsgb-lf-group@groups.io Onderwerp: Re: [rsgb-lf-group] LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test Hi Michel, Are you sure about settings for JT9-5? There is the period 0620 - 0720z which looks as if JT9-5 should have been OK. Thanks for the report! 73, Paul N1BUG On 1/14/19 4:59 AM, Michel Brunel wrote: > Hi Paul, > > No JT9-5 spots received yet, > > 19-01-13 23:20 2220 -37 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 19-01-14 00:00 2300 -35 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 19-01-14 02:00 0100 -37 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 19-01-14 02:20 0120 -33 -0.9 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 19-01-14 02:40 0140 -37 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 19-01-14 03:00 0200 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 19-01-14 03:20 0220 -36 -0.7 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 19-01-14 03:40 0240 -35 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 19-01-14 04:00 0300 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 19-01-14 04:20 0320 -32 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 19-01-14 04:40 0340 -34 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 19-01-14 05:00 0400 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 19-01-14 05:20 0420 -35 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 19-01-14 05:40 0440 -37 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 19-01-14 06:00 0500 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 19-01-14 06:20 0520 -34 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 19-01-14 07:00 0600 -37 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 19-01-14 07:20 0620 -32 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 19-01-14 07:40 0640 -29 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 19-01-14 08:00 0700 -29 -0.7 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 19-01-14 08:20 0720 -28 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 19-01-14 08:40 0740 -35 -0.9 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 19-01-14 09:00 0800 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > > > Michel - f5wk JN18HP > > > > Le samedi 12 janvier 2019 à 15:14:12, N1BUG écrivait : > >> Local weather and snow/ice conditions have improved enough to >> transmit on 2200m. > >> I am running a JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test on 136.395 kHz (136.000 'dial' >> plus 395 Hz audio). > >> All reception reports will be useful and appreciated. Reports from >> distant stations who can monitor both modes during the test will >> provide the best comparison between the modes. > >> If there are no problems with equipment I plan to let this test run >> for at least two nights, maybe three. > >> 73, >> Paul N1BUG -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#8499): https://groups.io/g/rsgb-lf-group/message/8499 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/29077750/1555778 Group Owner: rsgb-lf-group+owner@groups.io Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/rsgb-lf-group/leave/3440736/168031436/xyzzy [rik.strobbe@kuleuven.be] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-