Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x0D8rWSD014370 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 09:53:43 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gibLi-0005RV-V3 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 08:42:30 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gibLb-0005RM-5u for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 08:42:23 +0000 Received: from rhcavuit04.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([2a02:2c40:0:c0::25:137]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gibLY-00039z-Ae for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 08:42:22 +0000 X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@kuleuven.be X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-ID: E4BB4120009.A4CC5 X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Received: from icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (icts-p-smtps-1e.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.33]) by rhcavuit04.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4BB4120009 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 09:42:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX19.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-exmbx19.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.11.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA5C140B4; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 09:42:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.62) by ICTS-S-EXMBX19.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 09:42:11 +0100 Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::291a:cc4f:6953:698a]) by ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::291a:cc4f:6953:698a%25]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 09:42:11 +0100 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" , "rsgb-lf-group@groups.io" , "Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer bands" , "600MRG@mailman.qth.net" <600MRG@mailman.qth.net>, "paul@n1bug.com" Thread-Topic: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test Thread-Index: AQHUqoEjoc/dOnqlzUKYLoNbI+jA8KWsHfGbgADD6gg= Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2019 08:42:11 +0000 Message-ID: <1547368931365.44144@kuleuven.be> References: <7c1d6628-d950-9548-995c-9ebc6039bfed@n1bug.com>,<1547326807839.95696@kuleuven.be> In-Reply-To: <1547326807839.95696@kuleuven.be> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-GB, en-US Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.112.50.1] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello Paul, Alex, below my overnight JT9-10 copies . Not a single copy in JT9-5. The last copy of Paul (so far) was at 08.00 UTC, in broad daylight. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [2a02:2c40:0:c0:0:0:25:137 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: 69d86b33142413363dd56bd312139bf4 Subject: LF: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=LINES_OF_YELLING autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id x0D8rWSD014370 Hello Paul, Alex, below my overnight JT9-10 copies . Not a single copy in JT9-5. The last copy of Paul (so far) was at 08.00 UTC, in broad daylight. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T 2240 -36 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 2250 -36 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 2300 -36 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0010 -37 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0020 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0040 -35 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0100 -37 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0100 -37 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0110 -34 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0120 -37 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0130 -35 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0140 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0140 -34 -0.5 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0150 -34 -0.4 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0200 -33 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0200 -33 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0210 -33 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0220 -29 -1.0 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0220 -34 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0230 -33 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0240 -30 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0240 -37 -0.7 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0300 -31 -0.6 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0300 -35 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0310 -33 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0320 -34 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0320 -34 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0330 -35 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0340 -34 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0340 -36 -0.5 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0350 -35 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0400 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0620 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0640 -31 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0700 -32 -1.0 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0720 -30 -1.0 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0740 -30 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0800 -34 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X ________________________________________ Van: Rik Strobbe Verzonden: zaterdag 12 januari 2019 22:00 Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; rsgb-lf-group@groups.io; Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer bands; 600MRG@mailman.qth.net; paul@n1bug.com Onderwerp: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test Hello Paul, I will monitor both modes overnight on 136kHz dial and report in the morning. In JT9-10 I had 5 copies of R7NT so far (QRB 2505km). 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T ________________________________________ Van: 600mrg-bounces@mailman.qth.net <600mrg-bounces@mailman.qth.net> namens N1BUG Verzonden: zaterdag 12 januari 2019 15:14 Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; rsgb-lf-group@groups.io; Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer bands; 600MRG@mailman.qth.net Onderwerp: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test Local weather and snow/ice conditions have improved enough to transmit on 2200m. I am running a JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test on 136.395 kHz (136.000 'dial' plus 395 Hz audio). All reception reports will be useful and appreciated. Reports from distant stations who can monitor both modes during the test will provide the best comparison between the modes. If there are no problems with equipment I plan to let this test run for at least two nights, maybe three. 73, Paul N1BUG ______________________________________________________________ 600MRG mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/600mrg Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:600MRG@mailman.qth.net Message delivered to rik.strobbe@kuleuven.be This list hosted by: https://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html