Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wBUKvDc0001359 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 21:57:14 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gdi4C-0004TA-Qy for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 20:52:12 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gdi45-0004Sz-KJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 20:52:05 +0000 Received: from lethe.lipkowski.org ([151.80.54.59] helo=lipkowski.org) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gdi43-0001jA-7L for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 20:52:04 +0000 Received: from mailn.lipkowski.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wBUKjiAp032434 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 21:45:45 +0100 Received: from localhost (sq5bpf@localhost) by mailn.lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id wBUKjiF9032431 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 21:45:44 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: mailn.lipkowski.org: sq5bpf owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 21:45:43 +0100 (CET) From: Jacek Lipkowski To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <5C28AE1C.1020707@posteo.de> Message-ID: References: <976652757.10789891.1546166793929.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <976652757.10789891.1546166793929@mail.yahoo.com> <5C28AE1C.1020707@posteo.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score-sq5bpf: -2.9 () ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 on 10.1.3.10 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Ufortunately i didn't receive anything here. Not very exciting but i believe that negative results should also be reported. The spectrograms: https://klubnl.pl/grabber/grabber_sq5bpf_2970.png https://klubnl.pl/grabber/grabber_sq5bpf_2970_avg.png Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: a6b6ffaf48fdddf1ed5c25dc4bf03ee1 Subject: Re: ULF: Carrier on 2970.01 Hz Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Ufortunately i didn't receive anything here. Not very exciting but i believe that negative results should also be reported. The spectrograms: https://klubnl.pl/grabber/grabber_sq5bpf_2970.png https://klubnl.pl/grabber/grabber_sq5bpf_2970_avg.png Right now i use the same settings as on my 5170Hz grabber: a 3kHz wide filter centered on 2970Hz, followed by vtblank -a1.4 -d0 -t100 (vtblank from old vlfrx-tools). I would be grateful for any suggestions how to improve this, maybe the filter is too wide (and lets too many 50Hz harmonics through. which upset the blanker). The antenna isn't optimised for ULF. VY 73 Jacek / SQ5BPF On Sun, 30 Dec 2018, DK7FC wrote: > Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 12:38:04 +0100 > From: DK7FC > Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: ULF: Carrier on 2970.01 Hz > > Hi ULF, > > The accu is fully recharged and i am on the hill again, transmitting on the > ground loop antenna. This time, the accu has even more power. The TX power is > 520 W (!), the DC measurement tells i need just 64 V for 1 A, and now, at > 2970.01 Hz i am getting a record antenna current of 2.75 A!! > The carrier ison the air since 11:17 UTC and i intend to run it for 2 hours > again, like yesterday. > > Reports are welcome :-) > > 73, Stefan >